|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:44 am
Ah, if only I weren't so rusty. My best friend and I could go through a Zener deck with 100% accuracy, but I'm sure it would drop the second time around. It's rather draining (and somewhat boring) to accomplish.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 1:57 am
I think if you check out one of Psipogs updates or something, you'll find a big a** thing on how it's all a scam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 6:31 pm
a**l Jesus I think if you check out one of Psipogs updates or something, you'll find a big a** thing on how it's all a scam. Link? I'll look for it myself, but a link would be very helpful. EDIT: Nevermind, I found it. http://www.psipog.net/show.php?cmd=wp&id=14I'll assume that's the article you were talking about. That does raise a lot of questions about the form of the reward. I don't think that qualifies it as a "scam", but it certainly does seem pretty shady.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:19 pm
my idea cameras from above below and all side......three watches(have them buy it or examine it) of the exact type set to the same time and then use chronokinisis or whatever method you feel like and then collect your reward....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:55 pm
Obscurus a**l Jesus I think if you check out one of Psipogs updates or something, you'll find a big a** thing on how it's all a scam. Link? I'll look for it myself, but a link would be very helpful. EDIT: Nevermind, I found it. http://www.psipog.net/show.php?cmd=wp&id=14I'll assume that's the article you were talking about. That does raise a lot of questions about the form of the reward. I don't think that qualifies it as a "scam", but it certainly does seem pretty shady.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:10 am
Whether or not it's a scam, I've been reading some of the forum posts, and they're complete and total assholes. I mean, I know skeptics that can be very polite and structured about their arguments, but these guys are just plain hostile!
Even if I got my skills to a lab-tested level, I wouldn't go for the money just on the principal that these guys, even if they're proven wrong, are STILL going to be self-pretentious assholes.
Just my two cents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:41 pm
Joshua_Ritter Obscurus a**l Jesus I think if you check out one of Psipogs updates or something, you'll find a big a** thing on how it's all a scam. Link? I'll look for it myself, but a link would be very helpful. EDIT: Nevermind, I found it. http://www.psipog.net/show.php?cmd=wp&id=14I'll assume that's the article you were talking about. That does raise a lot of questions about the form of the reward. I don't think that qualifies it as a "scam", but it certainly does seem pretty shady. It's not so much saying that bonds are a scam as much as it's doubting whether the bonds actually exist. I mean, you can talk all you want about bonds, but it's pretty suspicious to not give any details about your supposed bonds. The way that they talk they want to test everyone they can right? So why not give the bond details to someone that asks so that that person will feel more comfortable with applying? They just seem like a pretentious ball of contradictions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:49 pm
Has anyone seen what Peebrain did with some other peers on Psipog?
I suggest you go to that site and read his blog. Along with other things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 9:23 pm
gamemaniac Has anyone seen what Peebrain did with some other peers on Psipog? I suggest you go to that site and read his blog. Along with other things. Are you talking about the geiger counter experiment or something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 9:25 pm
Obscurus gamemaniac Has anyone seen what Peebrain did with some other peers on Psipog? I suggest you go to that site and read his blog. Along with other things. Are you talking about the geiger counter experiment or something else? Yes, I found that interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 8:46 pm
gamemaniac Obscurus gamemaniac Has anyone seen what Peebrain did with some other peers on Psipog? I suggest you go to that site and read his blog. Along with other things. Are you talking about the geiger counter experiment or something else? Yes, I found that interesting. ...Geiger counters measure radiation levels... ...Damnit, now I have to go read it to satisfy my curiosity. Damn you, Game!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:33 pm
Obscurus Joshua_Ritter Obscurus a**l Jesus I think if you check out one of Psipogs updates or something, you'll find a big a** thing on how it's all a scam. Link? I'll look for it myself, but a link would be very helpful. EDIT: Nevermind, I found it. http://www.psipog.net/show.php?cmd=wp&id=14I'll assume that's the article you were talking about. That does raise a lot of questions about the form of the reward. I don't think that qualifies it as a "scam", but it certainly does seem pretty shady. It's not so much saying that bonds are a scam as much as it's doubting whether the bonds actually exist. I mean, you can talk all you want about bonds, but it's pretty suspicious to not give any details about your supposed bonds. The way that they talk they want to test everyone they can right? So why not give the bond details to someone that asks so that that person will feel more comfortable with applying? They just seem like a pretentious ball of contradictions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:20 pm
My wife and I agree. There's no point to proving it, since you'd most likely end up a bloody guinea pig if you proved it anyway. Anyone else know who River Tam is? I rest my case if you do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:52 pm
Laren My wife and I agree. There's no point to proving it, since you'd most likely end up a bloody guinea pig if you proved it anyway. Anyone else know who River Tam is? I rest my case if you do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:07 pm
Joshua_Ritter Obscurus Joshua_Ritter Obscurus a**l Jesus I think if you check out one of Psipogs updates or something, you'll find a big a** thing on how it's all a scam. Link? I'll look for it myself, but a link would be very helpful. EDIT: Nevermind, I found it. http://www.psipog.net/show.php?cmd=wp&id=14I'll assume that's the article you were talking about. That does raise a lot of questions about the form of the reward. I don't think that qualifies it as a "scam", but it certainly does seem pretty shady. It's not so much saying that bonds are a scam as much as it's doubting whether the bonds actually exist. I mean, you can talk all you want about bonds, but it's pretty suspicious to not give any details about your supposed bonds. The way that they talk they want to test everyone they can right? So why not give the bond details to someone that asks so that that person will feel more comfortable with applying? They just seem like a pretentious ball of contradictions. Yeah, but assume you get your bonds and they don't mature for fifty years? That's why it's shady of the JREF to not give details about their bonds. They say a lot trying to convince you that their bonds actually exist but when someone asks for the details they're not willing to comply but are rude as well. I just think it makes them rather shady looking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
