|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 8:52 pm
SheWolfDanielle Honestly, my real gut reaction? "Oh for crying out loud... he's just a guy." Really, he's just a person. I don't think a whole lot will come of it. Maybe a little political posturing, but really. Especially metaphysically? Nah, he's just another human. I don't believe that anything metaphysical could happen. Maybe rumors of his ghost haunting the place where he was killed, but even I strongly doubt that. Anything that I figure might happen, would be just political things. Nothing on an overly large scale either. I certainly am not expecting to see a new 9/11. Oh, and Obscurus: I'm amused by the South Park reference. I want to watch that movie again..
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 11:33 pm
Starlock The death of Saddam is irrelevant. The death of this man does not solve s**t. Iraq is still a nation shattered whose pieces will take at least a generation to restore. Nothing has been solved by this death. Unless of course they're eating him after they're killing him, but somehow I doubt they're doing that. At least if they ate him someone's hunger would be solved. But this? Meaningless. My brother breaks my things, no reaction. My sister makes me baby sit her kid, I don't care. Can't move from back problems and have a lot of work to do, whatever. A million stressors go through my mind, and I don't give them second thought... why do comments like these make my blood boil?... Do you know what he did? do you know how many people he's killed? How many battles he's led? or even.. WHY he did those things? From my understanding, (not to defend him) but, he has killed hundreds of people in villages, and.. BEFORE he did that, he went through the town in celibration, waving, and kissing people's hands, and then a failed assasination attempt pissed him off, so he individually questioned everyone about it, and anyone with no information was killed, because he was pissed. From what I know, He HATED america and wanted all americans to die, or atleast change, and he attacked us and captured our territory. But, in the first gulf war, Iraq was fighting Iran, and America was an ally to Iraq, and when Iraq won, Hussein found out that america had been buying weapons for Iran... He doesn't have excuses for being an insane b*****d who killed thousands, but... if he wasn't killed, he would have kept on killing thousands. if anything, his death has very much shortened the life of aggression between America and Iraq. However that doesn't count the Shiites who still hate america..... stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 11:35 pm
KilledbyKarma And atleast it means he won't command the deaths of anyMORE people... ^ Huzzah ^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:02 am
[BlkCat] Blind Guardian the 2nd Killing him doesn't legitimise the American invasion, nor does it bring back the people he killed, or even give them peace. I think it's a waste of ******** time. Off topic, but good to have you back ^.^. I would like to say (on-topic) that keeping him alive does nothing more than either let a guilty man free or make him rot in a prison taking up space. I say we should have made him die a painful death then let him rot in a shallow grave somewhere. Live or die, it doesn't make this world a better place. What's more, I think people shouldn't take such a happy interest in the death of a man they only know through the eyes of the media. Yes, he's dead. Maybe he did deserve it for being such a b*****d to people. And maybe, you people out there should stop paying attention to it. No-one's death is a reason to be happy, even the death of an evil man. Because things aren't even now he is dead. He might have "got his", but does that mean a ******** thing in a world of six billion people?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:46 am
The death of one who has brought death to many is worth nothing more then a nuclear bomb being destroid.
One weapon down another million to go.
Its a battle unfortunatly that humans fight and cause.
Its a battle where the line is not visible for both sides and causes more and more damage while neither side wins.
Its been called many things, Good vs. bad, Rightous against unrightous, and Light vs Dark. But in the end both sides lose and the point of this war is lost when you send more people to die then save.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 8:18 am
oh well, I sort of liked him...
It was the absolute power that did it to him
power corrupts, absolute power corrups absolutely -Eric Arthur Blair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 10:30 am
Blind Guardian the 2nd [BlkCat] Blind Guardian the 2nd Killing him doesn't legitimise the American invasion, nor does it bring back the people he killed, or even give them peace. I think it's a waste of ******** time. Off topic, but good to have you back ^.^. I would like to say (on-topic) that keeping him alive does nothing more than either let a guilty man free or make him rot in a prison taking up space. I say we should have made him die a painful death then let him rot in a shallow grave somewhere. Live or die, it doesn't make this world a better place. What's more, I think people shouldn't take such a happy interest in the death of a man they only know through the eyes of the media. Yes, he's dead. Maybe he did deserve it for being such a b*****d to people. And maybe, you people out there should stop paying attention to it. No-one's death is a reason to be happy, even the death of an evil man. Because things aren't even now he is dead. He might have "got his", but does that mean a ******** thing in a world of six billion people? I understand where you're coming from, it makes sense. However I also wouldn't say I delight in somebody's death, more though that I delight in justice and balance. Eye for an eye, soul for a soul, it's only a shame in my mind that saddam couldn't have died each time for every person he had killed unjustly. At least we can find balance in the sense that he wont be killing anybody else. Justice was carried out, if through that justice a guilty man must perish, let it be so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:55 pm
[BlkCat] Blind Guardian the 2nd [BlkCat] Blind Guardian the 2nd Killing him doesn't legitimise the American invasion, nor does it bring back the people he killed, or even give them peace. I think it's a waste of ******** time. Off topic, but good to have you back ^.^. I would like to say (on-topic) that keeping him alive does nothing more than either let a guilty man free or make him rot in a prison taking up space. I say we should have made him die a painful death then let him rot in a shallow grave somewhere. Live or die, it doesn't make this world a better place. What's more, I think people shouldn't take such a happy interest in the death of a man they only know through the eyes of the media. Yes, he's dead. Maybe he did deserve it for being such a b*****d to people. And maybe, you people out there should stop paying attention to it. No-one's death is a reason to be happy, even the death of an evil man. Because things aren't even now he is dead. He might have "got his", but does that mean a ******** thing in a world of six billion people? I understand where you're coming from, it makes sense. However I also wouldn't say I delight in somebody's death, more though that I delight in justice and balance. Eye for an eye, soul for a soul, it's only a shame in my mind that saddam couldn't have died each time for every person he had killed unjustly. At least we can find balance in the sense that he wont be killing anybody else. Justice was carried out, if through that justice a guilty man must perish, let it be so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 3:11 pm
Joshua_Ritter [BlkCat] Blind Guardian the 2nd [BlkCat] Blind Guardian the 2nd Killing him doesn't legitimise the American invasion, nor does it bring back the people he killed, or even give them peace. I think it's a waste of ******** time. Off topic, but good to have you back ^.^. I would like to say (on-topic) that keeping him alive does nothing more than either let a guilty man free or make him rot in a prison taking up space. I say we should have made him die a painful death then let him rot in a shallow grave somewhere. Live or die, it doesn't make this world a better place. What's more, I think people shouldn't take such a happy interest in the death of a man they only know through the eyes of the media. Yes, he's dead. Maybe he did deserve it for being such a b*****d to people. And maybe, you people out there should stop paying attention to it. No-one's death is a reason to be happy, even the death of an evil man. Because things aren't even now he is dead. He might have "got his", but does that mean a ******** thing in a world of six billion people? I understand where you're coming from, it makes sense. However I also wouldn't say I delight in somebody's death, more though that I delight in justice and balance. Eye for an eye, soul for a soul, it's only a shame in my mind that saddam couldn't have died each time for every person he had killed unjustly. At least we can find balance in the sense that he wont be killing anybody else. Justice was carried out, if through that justice a guilty man must perish, let it be so. That's why I didn't say tooth =).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 3:13 pm
[BlkCat] Joshua_Ritter [BlkCat] Blind Guardian the 2nd [BlkCat] Blind Guardian the 2nd Killing him doesn't legitimise the American invasion, nor does it bring back the people he killed, or even give them peace. I think it's a waste of ******** time. Off topic, but good to have you back ^.^. I would like to say (on-topic) that keeping him alive does nothing more than either let a guilty man free or make him rot in a prison taking up space. I say we should have made him die a painful death then let him rot in a shallow grave somewhere. Live or die, it doesn't make this world a better place. What's more, I think people shouldn't take such a happy interest in the death of a man they only know through the eyes of the media. Yes, he's dead. Maybe he did deserve it for being such a b*****d to people. And maybe, you people out there should stop paying attention to it. No-one's death is a reason to be happy, even the death of an evil man. Because things aren't even now he is dead. He might have "got his", but does that mean a ******** thing in a world of six billion people? I understand where you're coming from, it makes sense. However I also wouldn't say I delight in somebody's death, more though that I delight in justice and balance. Eye for an eye, soul for a soul, it's only a shame in my mind that saddam couldn't have died each time for every person he had killed unjustly. At least we can find balance in the sense that he wont be killing anybody else. Justice was carried out, if through that justice a guilty man must perish, let it be so. That's why I didn't say tooth =).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:26 am
Joshua_Ritter [BlkCat] Joshua_Ritter [BlkCat] Blind Guardian the 2nd Live or die, it doesn't make this world a better place. What's more, I think people shouldn't take such a happy interest in the death of a man they only know through the eyes of the media. Yes, he's dead. Maybe he did deserve it for being such a b*****d to people. And maybe, you people out there should stop paying attention to it. No-one's death is a reason to be happy, even the death of an evil man. Because things aren't even now he is dead. He might have "got his", but does that mean a ******** thing in a world of six billion people? I understand where you're coming from, it makes sense. However I also wouldn't say I delight in somebody's death, more though that I delight in justice and balance. Eye for an eye, soul for a soul, it's only a shame in my mind that saddam couldn't have died each time for every person he had killed unjustly. At least we can find balance in the sense that he wont be killing anybody else. Justice was carried out, if through that justice a guilty man must perish, let it be so. That's why I didn't say tooth =). Indeed =P, thus that solves the problem of humanity. We'd only lose our soul when we take another, thus if we don't kill, we don't die(unnaturally). To say that we'd all be blind and soulless is to say that every single person is a eye thief or a killer o.0 which is entirely untrue and illogical XD thus It's a perfect scale for judgment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:18 am
he was executed on a day of forgiveness and mercy....ironic....it bodes not well for nothing goes without notice or waves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 11:41 am
[BlkCat] I understand where you're coming from, it makes sense. However I also wouldn't say I delight in somebody's death, more though that I delight in justice and balance. Eye for an eye, soul for a soul, it's only a shame in my mind that saddam couldn't have died each time for every person he had killed unjustly. At least we can find balance in the sense that he wont be killing anybody else. Justice was carried out, if through that justice a guilty man must perish, let it be so. It may well be justice. I would not consider it balance. Balance would be hanging everyone who helped Saddam kill all those people. But hey, they're probably dead too, along with all those American and British soldiers, and thousands of Iraqi civilians. Who to we kill for justice and balance on their behalf, huh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:21 pm
[BlkCat] Joshua_Ritter [BlkCat] Joshua_Ritter [BlkCat] Blind Guardian the 2nd Live or die, it doesn't make this world a better place. What's more, I think people shouldn't take such a happy interest in the death of a man they only know through the eyes of the media. Yes, he's dead. Maybe he did deserve it for being such a b*****d to people. And maybe, you people out there should stop paying attention to it. No-one's death is a reason to be happy, even the death of an evil man. Because things aren't even now he is dead. He might have "got his", but does that mean a ******** thing in a world of six billion people? I understand where you're coming from, it makes sense. However I also wouldn't say I delight in somebody's death, more though that I delight in justice and balance. Eye for an eye, soul for a soul, it's only a shame in my mind that saddam couldn't have died each time for every person he had killed unjustly. At least we can find balance in the sense that he wont be killing anybody else. Justice was carried out, if through that justice a guilty man must perish, let it be so. That's why I didn't say tooth =). Indeed =P, thus that solves the problem of humanity. We'd only lose our soul when we take another, thus if we don't kill, we don't die(unnaturally). To say that we'd all be blind and soulless is to say that every single person is a eye thief or a killer o.0 which is entirely untrue and illogical XD thus It's a perfect scale for judgment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 4:32 pm
Joshua_Ritter [BlkCat] Joshua_Ritter [BlkCat] Joshua_Ritter An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth leaves the whole world blind and toothless. That's why I didn't say tooth =). Indeed =P, thus that solves the problem of humanity. We'd only lose our soul when we take another, thus if we don't kill, we don't die(unnaturally). To say that we'd all be blind and soulless is to say that every single person is a eye thief or a killer o.0 which is entirely untrue and illogical XD thus It's a perfect scale for judgment. It's really the whole 'Well that saves the lives of people he would have killed in the future' kind of thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![[BlkCat]'s avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/e9/b0/68ff25f32b0e9_flip.png?t=1249230010_6.00_01)
