Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Philosophers Anonymous
Philosophers Cafe Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

What'll you have?
coffee
14%
 14%  [ 2 ]
Juice
28%
 28%  [ 4 ]
pastry
14%
 14%  [ 2 ]
intellectual thought
35%
 35%  [ 5 ]
gold
7%
 7%  [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 14


Cirendia
Crew

Dapper Exhibitionist

16,515 Points
  • Mark Twain 100
  • Tycoon 200
  • Ultimate Player 200
PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:16 pm


Socrates in Disguise
Who IS pro war anyway? If they are that probably means they have some weird bend on destruction cause that's all war breeds. War happens. no one can stop it once it starts it will play it's course changing the world once again...Not for better not for worse...just...different. No if you'd be so kind as to pass the creamer. thanks.


*passes him the creamer* I would wonder about someone who is pro-war. They would probably have some kind of disallusionment, where they think that if they go to war or kill so many people it will be 'payback' for what someone else from that country or whatever did to them. It really doesn't make sense to me...and about Iraq anyways....are we really helping them set up their own government? It seems to me that we put another ditactor, american-educated, in place, so that we could have control over certain oil places...we have done that many times--and it hasn't always worked out. I would feel better if they had someone from the country itself, who lives there and knows the people, knows what they need, and how to get it to them.

About war in general...

Some would say it's another way of population control. For example, if our scientists really did come up with a way to make people live forever, how else would we die? Accidents and diseases can't take enough away, and so many people would keep reproducing and keep living that the world's natural supplies would be overrun, and eventually, destroyed. The wars would start/continue/worsen over resources, land, etc... we would start killing each other for food, shelter, mates, those kinds of things.

And why? We already kill each other for those kinds of things...why do we need more people to do it with? That's essentially what it would be...more people with infinite life-spans to do battle...

I believe we create our own problems. Look back to the Indians--they lived such simple lives, and American Indians were healthy, happy, had plenty of land and resources... They still warred with each other, to be sure, but really, they lived with the land, not just on it. They respected it and understood it, in ways that we don't today.

Other kinds of people didn't know that way of living, so they destroyed it. We believed that by making things, improving our technology, we would move up in life. And so many believe we have. But we are destroying the land.

I would think that to move up in the world, I would get rid of all of this stuff that I have, go back to the earth, and live the way the Indians used to. But I can't. I'm not cut out for that--I don't have the resources or the skills. I really don't even know what my point is. Maybe I'm just sad because I can't do that. That we all can't possibly heal what we have done unless everyone starts doing it.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 3:48 pm




Well, I am pausing on my road trip and thought I might say hello to you all and hope you are all well.

War... Well, war has many uses, it often sparks more technological advance, controls population, prevents stagnation of systems, boosts economies, gains resources and offers many political advantages both domestic and foreign. It is a tool in modern diplomacy and often an end in itself. Sometimes a leader needs a war for something irrelevent at home - consider the after effects of September 11th. The wars created have done nothing to help the situation, only make it worse - yet people felt that something was being done and were happy about it.... and it garenteed another term for Bush. Some time try watching 'Wag the Dog' for an amusing view.

The war in Iraq had support because of the propaganda used to start it. The populace of the US believed that somehow the war would be beneficial to them - remove a real threat of terrorism, prevent WMD manufacture, bring freedom to the Iraqi people... Whatever the lie of the moment was. In reality it is best serving the terrorists and the US government. The government is heavily build on the military industrial complex which now has much more spending and production. Arsenals have been updated, old weapons used before they expired and the military now has a wonderful excuse to ask for more funding and more people. The government has an external threat to rally the population behind, they have the opportunity to put a puppet dictator/government into Iraq to ensure oil access as well as to give money to US industry to 'rebuild' Iraq. Then there is the threat they can use as political currency on the world stage - 'look what we did to Iraq on a pretext, we can do that to you if you don't cooperate'. There are a myriad of reasons that the war has helped the government and the US industry base. These are why the war is supported... The population supports it because the media tells them to. The media is also just a puppet now... The US media at least is just abusing the population - I have oticed it myself since entering the US, the 'news' is propaganda and so biased it is useless as a source of 'information'.

So someone who supports the war could be perfectly rational and reasonable - just a victim of other factors. After all, you can only make a decision on what you know and what you have to work with. If you only know that Iraq had WMD capable of hitting anywhere in the world and the Iraqi people were begging the US to come rescue them would you think the war was such a bad idea?

Then of course there are people who for some reason or another want war. They want to fight, to kill, to dominate and to use military power actively. I won't say they are insane or anything - only that their worldview is very different to what seems to be common here... And perhaps it too has it's points, but a middle ground is usually the most productive, after all - if there is no War, no history of it, no memory of it and nothing to remind people what it is - it could occur and escalate beyond what is reasonable... In a sense it is better to have some small wars constantly than allow war to be some heoric myth which people long for without knowing the reality of it.

... Ok, enough on that. I have to continue my holidaying. I shall be back.... sometime.

SanguineV
Crew


ochimaru

PostPosted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:43 pm


I was in the National Guard at one time, which I'm ashamed to say. It seemed like a good idea at the time, until I went to Basic Training and they tried to brainwash me with "kill! kill! kill!" Not only that, but that everyone must be EXACTLY the same. It's like joining a society ruled by dictators or socialists. To uphold the Christian values of the country by killing for no cause... or no cause that you are told.

I recently started playing Battlefield 2 - which is an online war simulation game. I don't normally like that type of game... but a few friends play it and the demo was horribly addicting. One realization I had, is that the game was VERY similar to real war because I had no idea why I was fighting, who I was killing and no remorse for accidentally firing on unfamiliar allies. And I'm sure it is just as easy to die in a real war, too.

I digress... war sucks. I think we should just have the world leaders box it out on pay-per-view... or they can hire stand ins to box. Hell, use the money to help with the deficit or feed poor children. Something! It's really stupid to involve thousands or millions of people in a dispute of ideals between a handful of people. OR, maybe we could just have our wars determined by Battlefield 2 or something. We will battle it out virtually in front of the world. A virtual war of ideals, if you will.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:48 pm


Nuclear giants, Ethical infants: Mankind is more effecient at war than peace, Better at Killing than living. Truly, we are a naturally vicious People.

Count Aristocrat
Crew


Socrates in Disguise
Captain

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:51 pm


Count Aristocrat
Nuclear giants, Ethical infants: Mankind is more effecient at war than peace, Better at Killing than living. Truly, we are a naturally vicious People.
Why is that exactly? because it has been accepted as the unavoidable. Darwin hardened this fact with natural selection...Survival of the fittest which has been interpretted by these ignorant protectors as kill first or be killed. We are the fittest so we will survive...whoever else dies in the process is merely a casuality of evolution.

And Christian Hypocrisy isn't any better with the "divine Crusades" to save the promised land.
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 7:58 pm


Socrates in Disguise
Count Aristocrat
Nuclear giants, Ethical infants: Mankind is more effecient at war than peace, Better at Killing than living. Truly, we are a naturally vicious People.
Why is that exactly? because it has been accepted as the unavoidable. Darwin hardened this fact with natural selection...Survival of the fittest which has been interpretted by these ignorant protectors as kill first or be killed. We are the fittest so we will survive...whoever else dies in the process is merely a casuality of evolution.

And Christian Hypocrisy isn't any better with the "divine Crusades" to save the promised land.



Ah, yes... the promised land, the Middle East. That place hasn't been at peace since humans inhabited it, What with the Crusades, the ongoing battles between palistinians(sp?) and Isrealis, The current "Operation Bomb the Brown People" in Iraq. Yes, it would seem patriotism is just as bad as Christian Hypocrisy. Doesn't it seem like the populous protested Vietnam alot more? Or has the Government led the population that doesn't like this "War" to believe they can't do anything about it?

Jesus! I came here to relax, and I'm ranting! I suppose thats the spirit of the guild...dumpty treats please...

Count Aristocrat
Crew


Maze

PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2005 1:57 pm


Socrates in Disguise
Who IS pro war anyway? If they are that probably means they have some weird bend on destruction cause that's all war breeds. War happens. no one can stop it once it starts it will play it's course changing the world once again...Not for better not for worse...just...different. No if you'd be so kind as to pass the creamer. thanks.


I am not pro that war. And I'm not technically pro any war. But I'm not entirely anti-war either.

I'm all in favour of fighting for your freedom. If that means that I won't take someone else proclaiming my country annexed to theirs and here's a few nice new laws for you people living over there lying down, so be it.

I'm in favour of freedom. But can we really know freedom if there is nothing that challenges it?

Which reminds me *smiles* I need to pick up Clausewitz again.
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:55 am


There is a saying... somewhere... that Woman's power is to create and nurture and man's power is to destroy and fight. Eh, something along those lines. ^_^

But, that certainly doesn't mean our country wouldn't be the war-mongering nation it is if Hillary Clinton or Condolissa Rice was in power. We DO have our destructive women, after all. I know that I, personally, seem to have found some of the most destructive women I could find. Not purposefully, mind you.

I think a lot of the violence in the world boils down to our raw animalistic instincts left over from cavemen - as we have the same motives as many animals, we just like to think that we're more civilized, so fail to recognize our idiotic inane behaviors.

ochimaru


Cougar Draven

PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 11:59 am


ochimaru
I know that I, personally, seem to have found some of the most destructive women I could find. Not purposefully, mind you.


Oh yeah. I feel that.

Personally, I'm neither pro-war or anti-war. I just say let people fight their own battles. Strap Dubya with a shottie and drop him in Iraq to keep the peace. Hell, call Vince McMahon at the WWE offices in Connecticut, arrange a real World title match, between George Bush, Tony Blair, Saddam Hussein, and Osama bin Laden. Hell, I'd support that, because it'd either be Blair or Bush who would win. I mean, come on, we're afraid of a sixty-plus-year-old man in prison, and a middle-aged-to-elderly man on dialysis. We need some new standards of fear.

I still haven't decided whether coffee or intellectual thought is more important to me...do you guys make espresso? xd
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 4:22 pm


Oh, I'm not in favour of war because, yay violence, mind. I'm just allowing that some progress is made possible due to friction. And, well.. war is a LOT of friction.

And friction, in itself, isn't all that bad a thing.

But there is such a thing as too much, I suppose.

But then, who's ever heard of war in moderation?

Maze


Cougar Draven

PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:08 pm


Maze
But then, who's ever heard of war in moderation?


Moderation is one of those weird words. People say it, but they don't mean it. I like to say I drink caffeine in moderation, when in reality every time I get within twenty feet of a caffeine source, I drink it dry. I have the capacity to drink two pots of coffee an hour, if I allow myself any at all.

And then there was the original thought that to cure alcoholism, we allow confirmed alcoholics liquor in moderation. Oh yeah. That worked real well.

What does "in moderation" mean? Where does the line between "enough" and "too much" get drawn?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:28 am


One thing that's been driving me insane lately, is the annoying people on Gaia (hence why I hang out in here a lot). For some reason, people want a debate, and yet if you have a opposing opinion from theirs then you must be an idiot. And with my signature, a lot of these people like to think that everything I say MUST be a philosophical point of view. Which is outright ridiculous... unless you consider philosophy to just be someone's opinion.

It also seems that a lot of people on Gaia want to talk... but they don't want to read or write anything intellectual. They start a thread about a specific subject and then fill it with idle chatter about their daily lives.

But part of me desires to push people's buttons. I'm not content to sit back and twiddle my thumbs on gaia. I'm here to give my opnion and to hear others opinions.... and to dress up my avi of course. ha ha..

But I'm thankful for people like all of you who show me that there ARE people out there with brains and opinions... which I'm very thankful for. If I hadn't found this forum I'd probably quit gaia. I mean, if I wanted to hear dull and pointless 1 sentence comments I would watch MTV.

I think too many people are afraid to HAVE an opinion, discuss it, defend it and/or change their opinion when necessary. If I realize that I'm wrong, I will admit it up front. I have never claimed to be an expert on anything, and have stated many times that I know nothing.

ochimaru


presentiment

PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:30 am


*walks in and looks around*
wow you guys talk of war being bad and yet all youve done is fight??

oh well its fun even when we deny it
this is thepointof teh guild and Ill join the fights in a sec
Ill take a Red Bull
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:33 am


Cougar Draven
What does "in moderation" mean? Where does the line between "enough" and "too much" get drawn?


Exactly. And what is still 'fine' for one, is 'completely unacceptable' to another.

Maze


Cougar Draven

PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:16 am


Maze
Cougar Draven
What does "in moderation" mean? Where does the line between "enough" and "too much" get drawn?


Exactly. And what is still 'fine' for one, is 'completely unacceptable' to another.


Yep. Like how some people find treating their elders like crap as 'fine', while I look at that as 'completely unacceptable'. I had a particular kid I know in mind, by the way. That's where the lines of moderation and tolerance are drawn, between two words. And they're flexible, too, aren't they?

And ochimaru, I know I have a brain. I just fried it as a kid smoking pot and drinking. I'm one of those rare brains/brawn combinations that can still think while lifting heavy things. Plus I can sing! mrgreen

I just have this way about me. I'm sarcastic. I'm a smart a**. And assorted other words that mean roughly the same thing. I'm a smartass and a dumbass, and I use my brain. Kinda weird, eh?

I'm glad to be here, where I can fry my brain the right way.
Reply
Philosophers Anonymous

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum