|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 8:04 pm
famusamu lordstar Krishna is cool i could worship him right? Krishna is a false g-d. congratz for being the one person to fall for my silly trap Krishna is Hindu for Christ same guy different times different stories but same guy
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:37 am
lordstar famusamu lordstar Krishna is cool i could worship him right? Krishna is a false g-d. congratz for being the one person to fall for my silly trap Krishna is Hindu for Christ same guy different times different stories but same guy I didn't fall into ANY TRAP!!!!! krisna is a false g-d, and NOT associated with Christianity. I'm sorry but Krisna is NOT Jesus Christ! The term Krishna( कृष्ण) in Sanskrit has the literal meaning of "black" or "dark one", not Christ. Jesus is in no way associated with the pagan deity krisna, and you won't find Jesus name ANYWHERE in the Hindu pantheon of g-ds. Nor will you find krisna in the Bible! Lists of the names of krisnaAnyways Christ comes from the Greek Cristos( Χριστός) which means Annointed One, in Hebrew it is Mashiach( משיח) which means Messiah.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:42 pm
I think there are other gods and I worship other gods and goddesses, but thats because I am not Christian. But I think that there are other gods, and I did when I was Christian, but youcouldn't worship them before God Himself meaning God has to come first and oll the other gods must come second. That has awlays been my take on it anyway. But I htink that there are other gods, just that they cannot be placed ont he same pedastal of the Christian God and that they cannot be worshippe din the same way as him because only he is worthy of that way of worship.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:46 pm
famusamu lordstar famusamu lordstar Krishna is cool i could worship him right? Krishna is a false g-d. congratz for being the one person to fall for my silly trap Krishna is Hindu for Christ same guy different times different stories but same guy I didn't fall into ANY TRAP!!!!! krisna is a false g-d, and NOT associated with Christianity. I'm sorry but Krisna is NOT Jesus Christ! The term Krishna( कृष्ण) in Sanskrit has the literal meaning of "black" or "dark one", not Christ. Jesus is in no way associated with the pagan deity krisna, and you won't find Jesus name ANYWHERE in the Hindu pantheon of g-ds. Nor will you find krisna in the Bible! Lists of the names of krisnaAnyways Christ comes from the Greek Cristos( Χριστός) which means Annointed One, in Hebrew it is Mashiach( משיח) which means Messiah. why say g-d, and ot god?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:17 pm
famusamu I didn't fall into ANY TRAP!!!!! krisna is a false g-d, and NOT associated with Christianity. I'm sorry but Krisna is NOT Jesus Christ! The term Krishna( कृष्ण) in Sanskrit has the literal meaning of "black" or "dark one", not Christ. Jesus is in no way associated with the pagan deity krisna, and you won't find Jesus name ANYWHERE in the Hindu pantheon of g-ds. Nor will you find krisna in the Bible! Lists of the names of krisnaAnyways Christ comes from the Greek Cristos( Χριστός) which means Annointed One, in Hebrew it is Mashiach( משיח) which means Messiah. Seconded. Dude, calling Krishna Christ is about as offensive to hindus as it is the christians. They are totally different.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:19 pm
I only beleive in one GOD JESUS is the way the truth and the life and by him is the only way we can get saved. 3nodding So why worship other gods? No other gods can give u the gift of salvation, only God can. And theres only one way to get to heaven.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:29 pm
famusamu lordstar famusamu lordstar Krishna is cool i could worship him right? Krishna is a false g-d. congratz for being the one person to fall for my silly trap Krishna is Hindu for Christ same guy different times different stories but same guy I didn't fall into ANY TRAP!!!!! krisna is a false g-d, and NOT associated with Christianity. I'm sorry but Krisna is NOT Jesus Christ! The term Krishna( कृष्ण) in Sanskrit has the literal meaning of "black" or "dark one", not Christ. Jesus is in no way associated with the pagan deity krisna, and you won't find Jesus name ANYWHERE in the Hindu pantheon of g-ds. Nor will you find krisna in the Bible! Lists of the names of krisnaAnyways Christ comes from the Greek Cristos( Χριστός) which means Annointed One, in Hebrew it is Mashiach( משיח) which means Messiah. first off i would like to point out that you got your info from winki rolleyes second it even says at the top of the list that it is incomplete and ya your not going to find "Christ" in the Hindu pantheon of gods because its a freaken different language different cultures tend to call things by different names names change but the stories stay similar btw messiah is on the list i have but whatever i wonder how much you know about the worlds religions
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:38 pm
im not seeing much of a difference other than "historical" dates wich only points to a phisical difference and far from the point i was making
ya know of all the people ive talked to i have yet to find anyone who has taken offence to such a clame well perhaps untill now
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:38 am
I believe in the "trinity", father son and holy ghost, all three of which are exactly the same. three different forms of god seperated physically, but not to be confused for them to be considered three seperate gods that act on their OWN will.
when god was speaking about not putting other "gods" before Him, he meant that in a metaphorical since, and thus don't put anything before god in youre life.
and honestly you can make ANY "thing" a god....in your mind. you can worship anything....doesn't MAKE it a god, but whatever it is you worship whether its money or fame or computers for that matter.....if it comes before god its idolising.
But God wasnt "literally" speaking about other existing gods in the universe. it was metaphorical. be careful what you take for "literal" meanings in the bible.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:37 am
lordstar im not seeing much of a difference other than "historical" dates wich only points to a phisical difference and far from the point i was making ya know of all the people ive talked to i have yet to find anyone who has taken offence to such a clame well perhaps untill now Is your spelling that bad on purpose? Or do you have typing problems? I'm not trying to make this argumentum ad hominem, but it's hard to take anything you write seriously with your spelling errors. You said in an earlier post the stories stayed similar, I'm sorry but NO WHERE in the Bhagavad Gita does it mention Krishna dieing for the sins of mankind and coming back to judge the quick and the dead, you will ONLY find that in the Bible! Y'shua (Jesus) said 'I am the Way the Truth and the Life, no man comes to the Father( the G-dhead)[or to Heaven] but by Me." John 14:6
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:43 am
I am a Messianic Jew, I don't write the Name with an 'O' where it can be erased or profaned. Here is a post I on a few other websites I visit: Why I write G-d Many people ask why do I type 'G-d' ~ Well 1st of all it's because I am a Messianic Jew. Secondly, I write it like that as a sign of respect and to remember that His Name should always be something unique and special. Why do you write it that way you may ask? This is to avoid taking His Name lightly or in vain Why is G-d spelled the without an "o" throughout Jewish writings? Any Hebrew Name of G-d is forbidden to erase. From the Torah's exhortation to destroy idolatry, we learn out the prohibition not to destroy the Name of G-d. (see Deuteronomy 12:3-4) In Exodus 20:7 it says, "You shall not take the name of the LORD your G-d in vain, for the LORD will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain." It is forbidden to erase or deface the Name of G-d, and this prohibition applies to all languages. We, therefore, insert a dash in middle of G-d's Name, allowing us to erase or discard the paper it is written on if necessary. It also is a way of showing respect such as when on the Internet where it can be profaned and disrepected. In the Bible, in prayer books and Holy writings G-d's Name is written properly, for there is no fear that one will discard a Holy text. Although "G-d" is really just a title and not His name, it certainly is a word which is reserved for Him alone (as opposed to "Creator" or "the benevolent one" which can be used in other contexts as well). We show respect to G-d by not defacing or discarding a word which is designated for Him. Note that if you disagree with another poster's decision to omit or include the hyphen, you should not publicly criticize or ridicule said poster. Shaul (Paul) wrote: "To the Yehudim(Jews) I became as a Yehudi(Jew), that I might gain Yehudim(Jews); to those who are under the Law, as under the Law, that I might gain those who are under the Law;" 1 Corinthians 9:20 Hebrew Names Version Point in History: Between 890ce to 940ce, the Hebrew Scriptures added vowels to the Torah. Before this, the Torah had no Vowels. Thus the Name of G-d was written YHWH
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 3:50 pm
lordstar im not seeing much of a difference other than "historical" dates wich only points to a phisical difference and far from the point i was making You know, now that you mention it, I don't see much a difference between hitler and Jesus, aside from the 'historical' dates, which, was you have pointed out, only points ot a physical difference. I mean, other then that, they're completely the same, right?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:14 pm
SaintChaos I believe in the "trinity", father son and holy ghost, all three of which are exactly the same. three different forms of god seperated physically, but not to be confused for them to be considered three seperate gods that act on their OWN will. when god was speaking about not putting other "gods" before Him, he meant that in a metaphorical since, and thus don't put anything before god in youre life. and honestly you can make ANY "thing" a god....in your mind. you can worship anything....doesn't MAKE it a god, but whatever it is you worship whether its money or fame or computers for that matter.....if it comes before god its idolising. But God wasnt "literally" speaking about other existing gods in the universe. it was metaphorical. be careful what you take for "literal" meanings in the bible. i would just like to say that i agree and that acording to "Conversations With God" God is us who is God so don't put anything before God is don't put anything before you is don't put anything before you remembering yourself as God? odd isn't it
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:25 pm
famusamu lordstar im not seeing much of a difference other than "historical" dates wich only points to a phisical difference and far from the point i was making ya know of all the people ive talked to i have yet to find anyone who has taken offence to such a clame well perhaps untill now Is your spelling that bad on purpose? Or do you have typing problems? I'm not trying to make this argumentum ad hominem, but it's hard to take anything you write seriously with your spelling errors. You said in an earlier post the stories stayed similar, I'm sorry but NO WHERE in the Bhagavad Gita does it mention Krishna dieing for the sins of mankind and coming back to judge the quick and the dead, you will ONLY find that in the Bible! Y'shua (Jesus) said 'I am the Way the Truth and the Life, no man comes to the Father( the G-dhead)[or to Heaven] but by Me." John 14:6 ya sorry about not being clear when i was talking about stories and similarities it wasn't a refrence to the Bhagavad Gita or any of the many hindu text (i hear the Upanishads and the Rig-Veda are fun although i havent had a chance yet to read more than a few bits) what i was talking about there was more stuff like the difference between the christian version of the story of Adam and Eve and the Jewish story im a Jew by blood so when i found out i wanted to know more
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:38 pm
Cometh The Inquisitor lordstar im not seeing much of a difference other than "historical" dates wich only points to a phisical difference and far from the point i was making You know, now that you mention it, I don't see much a difference between hitler and Jesus, aside from the 'historical' dates, which, was you have pointed out, only points ot a physical difference. I mean, other then that, they're completely the same, right? idk hitler wasn't much about peace and love although it is rumered that jesus led a armed rebelion lots of people have lost their lives over both although i don't think that was what jesus had in mind perhaps i missed the boat or we missed it or someting because im not seeing what your looking at on a side note there have been men of God who have done far worse things then hitler and yes my spelling sucks i knew that no need to sucker punch me for it not that anyone has yet but just fyi
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|