|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:37 am
Gandolin I noticed quite a few people mentioned global warming, pollution, and water problems. These problems are too costlly, but what if they cost nothing? I don't know that I would ever be able to pull it off, but what if you had some sort of community service type organization that drafted people to work for so many years. It could be applied into the government somehow so that, instead of costing money, it cost time and gave people extra rights or something. Some people can't find a job anyhow and some people are just looking for a way to live. This could not only clean up the environment but provide a way for poorer people to have meals every day as well as shelter. This is of course supposing we get the people to work without pay serving the community, which I don't think people should be paid for anyway. Serving the community is serving yourself and is pay in its own way, but maybe I am being too optimistic of this world. How bout this small twist on that idea: An organizatuion that offers opeople a place to live and stuff for working on that stuff. If UI had a lot of money, I'd do that. Then, people who had no jobs or homes could have a place to wrok, and a place to stay and food to eat and stuff.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:32 pm
ampedVAMP Gandolin I noticed quite a few people mentioned global warming, pollution, and water problems. These problems are too costlly, but what if they cost nothing? I don't know that I would ever be able to pull it off, but what if you had some sort of community service type organization that drafted people to work for so many years. It could be applied into the government somehow so that, instead of costing money, it cost time and gave people extra rights or something. Some people can't find a job anyhow and some people are just looking for a way to live. This could not only clean up the environment but provide a way for poorer people to have meals every day as well as shelter. This is of course supposing we get the people to work without pay serving the community, which I don't think people should be paid for anyway. Serving the community is serving yourself and is pay in its own way, but maybe I am being too optimistic of this world. How bout this small twist on that idea: An organizatuion that offers opeople a place to live and stuff for working on that stuff. If UI had a lot of money, I'd do that. Then, people who had no jobs or homes could have a place to wrok, and a place to stay and food to eat and stuff. Like...Like...A MILLITARY THAT ACTUALLY HELPED PEOPLE!?
Grand this idea is...it cuts into war spending, and I'm fairly certain the USA will ALWAYS be in a war...
Ooooo
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:36 pm
Moonlite Symphony ampedVAMP Gandolin I noticed quite a few people mentioned global warming, pollution, and water problems. These problems are too costlly, but what if they cost nothing? I don't know that I would ever be able to pull it off, but what if you had some sort of community service type organization that drafted people to work for so many years. It could be applied into the government somehow so that, instead of costing money, it cost time and gave people extra rights or something. Some people can't find a job anyhow and some people are just looking for a way to live. This could not only clean up the environment but provide a way for poorer people to have meals every day as well as shelter. This is of course supposing we get the people to work without pay serving the community, which I don't think people should be paid for anyway. Serving the community is serving yourself and is pay in its own way, but maybe I am being too optimistic of this world. How bout this small twist on that idea: An organizatuion that offers opeople a place to live and stuff for working on that stuff. If UI had a lot of money, I'd do that. Then, people who had no jobs or homes could have a place to wrok, and a place to stay and food to eat and stuff. Like...Like...A MILLITARY THAT ACTUALLY HELPED PEOPLE!?
Grand this idea is...it cuts into war spending, and I'm fairly certain the USA will ALWAYS be in a war...
OooooPrecisely! Exactly like a military that helped people. We could even set the same age limits for being drafted. The point, however, would be to solve many of the complaints the government and companies have about spending so much money on cleaning up. Another nice thing about the idea is that it would be mostly self reliant and would not be limited to the number of people that were drafted.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 3:05 pm
Gandolin Moonlite Symphony ampedVAMP Gandolin I noticed quite a few people mentioned global warming, pollution, and water problems. These problems are too costlly, but what if they cost nothing? I don't know that I would ever be able to pull it off, but what if you had some sort of community service type organization that drafted people to work for so many years. It could be applied into the government somehow so that, instead of costing money, it cost time and gave people extra rights or something. Some people can't find a job anyhow and some people are just looking for a way to live. This could not only clean up the environment but provide a way for poorer people to have meals every day as well as shelter. This is of course supposing we get the people to work without pay serving the community, which I don't think people should be paid for anyway. Serving the community is serving yourself and is pay in its own way, but maybe I am being too optimistic of this world. How bout this small twist on that idea: An organizatuion that offers opeople a place to live and stuff for working on that stuff. If UI had a lot of money, I'd do that. Then, people who had no jobs or homes could have a place to wrok, and a place to stay and food to eat and stuff. Like...Like...A MILLITARY THAT ACTUALLY HELPED PEOPLE!?
Grand this idea is...it cuts into war spending, and I'm fairly certain the USA will ALWAYS be in a war...
OooooPrecisely! Exactly like a military that helped people. We could even set the same age limits for being drafted. The point, however, would be to solve many of the complaints the government and companies have about spending so much money on cleaning up. Another nice thing about the idea is that it would be mostly self reliant and would not be limited to the number of people that were drafted. One of the ways we got out of the depression was "Public works projects" these were massive construction or cleaning operations. The government would personaly hire people to go do something...probably something useless. But these people would get paid. So then they spend money and stimulate the economy! Now when they did things like ...make a national park, or fix a road; they allowed for more business in that area.
It was a way of actually using the people to help the people to help the government.
If we kept that concept of public works going with a Public Works Corps. we could essentialy keep the country operating smoothly, and aid the economy. countless thousands would be able to find jobs in any region.
It's simple, easy to impliment, and HELPS.
It simply involves a lot litigation and argument. I think if we gave people a choice between mandatory service in public works or in military you'd have tons of people do public works at least once i ntheir lives, and still get military service.
In times of drafting they'd simply allow people to leave public works for military service, or maybe turn it into a form of maintainence for military equipment and have them help production.
It's not as if it's complex. Nor is it a new idea...our government just doesn't want to become more socialist, wellfare is already pushing it dangerously close.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:30 am
I know there's a lot of different theories, especially about the destruction of the human race. I think, if left to our own devices, we would eventually get to the point of no return even if we then do everything we can to fix the problem, whether it's global warming, nuclear warfare, or whatever. I don't actually believe that we will destroy ourselves, though, because of the fact that I am a Christian. I believe in the Rapture, in which all the Christians are taken from Earth in the blink of an eye and everyone else has seven years to turn their lives around before the world is wiped clean and God builds His kingdom on Earth. I'm certain that this will all take place before we are able to destroy ourselves.
There are certain other characteristics of the world just before and after the rapture that affects my view of our future as well. For example, there will be a One-World Government, a One-World Religion, and a single world currency during the end times. I'm certain that the world will ever TRULY be completely at peace, though the world's many governments may make peace with each other. There will probably never be an end to crime until the end of time. *Heh, that rhymes!*
Now, will that said, if we end up actually being able to COLONIZE outer space before the Rapture, I think that will mostly serve to INCREASE racism, or segregation at the least. Instead of different races having their own side of the street, they can have their own side of the UNIVERSE! In order to ease that problem, we could do something like they do in Old Man's War and The Ghost Brigades by John Scalzi. If you haven't read the books, they have a "Colonial Union" that takes people, especially from impoverished countries, and send them off to colonize another planet. There is also a "Colonial Defense Forces" that is there to protect those colonists. The CDF is made up of people from Earth that have decided to spend years defending the human race instead of dying a few years from now; they take elderly people and give them younger bodies to fight in. I know we don't have that sort of technology, but we can use that as an idea. Also note, this would NOT solve the problem, but it would make it easier to deal with.
That's all I have for now... Maybe I'll pop back in later wink
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 3:00 am
Moonlite Symphony Gandolin Moonlite Symphony ampedVAMP Gandolin I noticed quite a few people mentioned global warming, pollution, and water problems. These problems are too costlly, but what if they cost nothing? I don't know that I would ever be able to pull it off, but what if you had some sort of community service type organization that drafted people to work for so many years. It could be applied into the government somehow so that, instead of costing money, it cost time and gave people extra rights or something. Some people can't find a job anyhow and some people are just looking for a way to live. This could not only clean up the environment but provide a way for poorer people to have meals every day as well as shelter. This is of course supposing we get the people to work without pay serving the community, which I don't think people should be paid for anyway. Serving the community is serving yourself and is pay in its own way, but maybe I am being too optimistic of this world. How bout this small twist on that idea: An organizatuion that offers opeople a place to live and stuff for working on that stuff. If UI had a lot of money, I'd do that. Then, people who had no jobs or homes could have a place to wrok, and a place to stay and food to eat and stuff. Like...Like...A MILLITARY THAT ACTUALLY HELPED PEOPLE!?
Grand this idea is...it cuts into war spending, and I'm fairly certain the USA will ALWAYS be in a war...
OooooPrecisely! Exactly like a military that helped people. We could even set the same age limits for being drafted. The point, however, would be to solve many of the complaints the government and companies have about spending so much money on cleaning up. Another nice thing about the idea is that it would be mostly self reliant and would not be limited to the number of people that were drafted. One of the ways we got out of the depression was "Public works projects" these were massive construction or cleaning operations. The government would personaly hire people to go do something...probably something useless. But these people would get paid. So then they spend money and stimulate the economy! Now when they did things like ...make a national park, or fix a road; they allowed for more business in that area.
It was a way of actually using the people to help the people to help the government.
If we kept that concept of public works going with a Public Works Corps. we could essentialy keep the country operating smoothly, and aid the economy. countless thousands would be able to find jobs in any region.
It's simple, easy to impliment, and HELPS.
It simply involves a lot litigation and argument. I think if we gave people a choice between mandatory service in public works or in military you'd have tons of people do public works at least once i ntheir lives, and still get military service.
In times of drafting they'd simply allow people to leave public works for military service, or maybe turn it into a form of maintainence for military equipment and have them help production.
It's not as if it's complex. Nor is it a new idea...our government just doesn't want to become more socialist, wellfare is already pushing it dangerously close.That, sounds like an idea! If it has already worked, we might be able to pull it off again. That would be a splendid idea! Maybe we could expand it further into the world so that we could get a greater grasp on more of the problems of whole world. It will take everyone if we are to put a stop to any problems like water, pollution, or global warming. What we need is a unification of the whole world.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:55 pm
There could be many reasons to keep the human race from progressing any further. The one i am most concerned about is the sun. At any time the sun could start its stages of collapse. That would surely end the human race. burning_eyes
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:11 am
Someone talked about regulating the population. I was thinking, what if the population was regulated world wide. So that two parents could have no more than two kids. That way the population would never grow, it would only shrink or stay the same. And in the event it started getting too small, the number could be increased to three. Keep in mind this is just musing, not an acctual idea.
Sam_Took
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 3:07 pm
Sam_Took Someone talked about regulating the population. I was thinking, what if the population was regulated world wide. So that two parents could have no more than two kids. That way the population would never grow, it would only shrink or stay the same. And in the event it started getting too small, the number could be increased to three. Keep in mind this is just musing, not an acctual idea. Sam_Took In the US you get tax breaks for having more kids. It's a dependant, so you get an "allowance." Or basically pay less taxes per person you take care of.
I think you should pay MORE tax for having more kids because that's more citizen using more resources. And so on, it would discourage excessive childbirth.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2006 2:08 pm
That's definately a solution, but why should more people be a problem? It gives more people to come up with better ideas.
Just a question.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:21 pm
Theoretically; would it not be a better idea to have politicians serve a mandatory 4 year enlistment in the Armed Forces? Thusly; we might be able to prevent more warfare. Additionally; the possibilities taxation for each additional child would actually damage the economy; due to the reduction in workforce as is the case with japan: http://www.stat.go.jp/English/data/handbook/c02cont.htmAdditionally; massive public works projects are ways of eliminating unemployment. This could be achieved easily with powered exoskeletons (commonly called Mechs) Some are currently under development at Mechanized Propulsion Systems inc. http://www.mechaps.com/main.htmlThanks; ARC Lambda 00 Mechanized Propulsion Systems inc. Off-site XHMI (Experimental Human Machine Interface) Designer
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:03 pm
Well as the weather conditions are getting worse i can say NO.Water level rising,extreme heat etc.These are sign of humans race dying out in the future.As far as other planets are concerned i really dont think that living on Mars will be posible.I just have that feeling.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:29 pm
Archelaus Well as the weather conditions are getting worse i can say NO.Water level rising,extreme heat etc.These are sign of humans race dying out in the future.As far as other planets are concerned i really dont think that living on Mars will be posible.I just have that feeling. What if we had presurized domes?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:09 am
Gandolin Archelaus Well as the weather conditions are getting worse i can say NO.Water level rising,extreme heat etc.These are sign of humans race dying out in the future.As far as other planets are concerned i really dont think that living on Mars will be posible.I just have that feeling. What if we had presurized domes? had what?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:09 pm
I think about it. I think we are all going to die because we will not be able to invent technology that will allow us to move to another planet and cut off from earth completely before global warming destroys earth. If people weren't saying global warming doesn't exist, being lied to that it doesn't exist, and accepting the lies that global warming isn't real on the other hand we MIGHT make it, but it is very doubtful.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|