|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 3:36 pm
Vincent Darkholme Mirko_Filipovic Wtf, who the hell came up with bruce lee kicking with 10000 psi. That my friend is utter s**t. Had he actually been able to kick that hard, he most likely would have broken said machine. Making your story another myth. The documentry made about Bruce Lee's life on Biography on A&E. Do watch it sometime. lol I've seen a video of Bruce lee kicking a 150lbs heavy bag hard enough to send it through the ceiling, and the kick it'self was enough to rip rigth rhough the bag's outsie covering. I wouldn't ******** with that s**t. Wow... A&E... I'll believe them. I've seen video of Kareem abdul jabarr kicking the s**t out of bruce lee, only to be blinded. That mean that kareem abudl jabarr would kill bruce lee? OH NO Kareem is alive?!?! and Bruce lee is dead?! obviously Kareem killed bruce lee. I mean really, give me a break. Video can be manipulated so easily it's amazing you can even believe that. If you're going to site a video, show it. And actually, if you're going to show a video showcasing someone fighting prowess, make sure it's actually him fighting. I could easily show Ronnie coleman working out and say OMG LOOK HOW MUCH HE LIFTS! He's obviously going to jsut grab someone's skull and crush it. I other words. I don't believe even 3/4ths of the s**t said about bruce lee. Far too many myths. He was great and all. But he wasn't some super-human being like everyone makes him out to be. On a related note, on one of the boards i visit. someone made a video about how Chuck norris went down to brazil and challenged a gracie... then got choked out. Think it was royler. (the video was a spoof, but it did happen however.) Oh and thunderfoot. Dan Inosanto looks alot like Egan Inoue... well when dan was younger.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 7:33 pm
Mirko, you knwo s**t abotu cinimatogrpahy.
The film they used in the 60's is VERY difficutl to manipulate, in fact ehn the Star Wars speical edoition caem out, they actiually had to lay the new effects OVER the old film, rather then alter it normally, due ot he type of film used.
So I seriosuly doubt they 'altered' it for a DOCUMENTRY, shut up your a ******** troll who hates to lose, I mean you've got NO sense of practical application of martial arts, all you knwo is baswe upon STRUCTURED fights you've seen on video.
s**t, I bet I coudl break your ******** neck with my CALF muscles, stop aruging such flimsy and shitty points, I mean DAMN you have thrity different excuxes for every time someoen proves you wrong.
If I were crew I'd have banned your a** already.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 8:02 pm
Vincent Darkholme If I were crew I'd have banned your a** already. But you're not. Guys, if you're going to argue, do it in a civil manner. No need to say stuff like that about other members. Anyone else is fair game, but in the guild, I think there's something to be said about respecting other members.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:43 pm
Vincent Darkholme Mirko, you knwo s**t abotu cinimatogrpahy. The film they used in the 60's is VERY difficutl to manipulate, in fact ehn the Star Wars speical edoition caem out, they actiually had to lay the new effects OVER the old film, rather then alter it normally, due ot he type of film used. So I seriosuly doubt they 'altered' it for a DOCUMENTRY, shut up your a ******** troll who hates to lose, I mean you've got NO sense of practical application of martial arts, all you knwo is baswe upon STRUCTURED fights you've seen on video. s**t, I bet I coudl break your ******** neck with my CALF muscles, stop aruging such flimsy and shitty points, I mean DAMN you have thrity different excuxes for every time someoen proves you wrong. If I were crew I'd have banned your a** already. Vale tudo is structured? Hardly. And you're telling me that i don't know practical applications? Yeah sure buddy. Also, if you're going to try to demean me, please better your knowledge of the english language. Also, i'm not the one talking s**t about another member, nor am I the one getting pissed off because someone thinks Bruce Lee was just a mere mortal who was a NORMAL MAN. Not some super human 10000psi kicking being. you realize 10000psi is string than a tiger sharks bite right? And let's see, they STILL altered the film. You can alter any film. Why would they alter it? Because of the ideal that Bruce lee was some sort of demi-god of martial arts. News has altered the facts many times. Why not say "We have documented proof of Bruce lee's fights" in order to draw attention? And MY points are weak? You in that last attack upon my character, have critisized/contradicted yourself by saying. 1) I only cite videos, you had previously cited A&E's biography. 2) Your whole arguement was an attack upon me. 3)Vale Tudo is not structured at all. Also, how do you break someone's neck using 1 muscle? It's a physically impossible. Also, name when I have had an excuse for a time i've been proven wrong? Also, when HAVE I been proven wrong? Don't be mad you're gay.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 4:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:01 pm
What's that an observation of? Please explain further.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:05 pm
You claim to cite videos as proof, yet you say that any videos/film media cited by another person is somehow altered to make it false.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:10 pm
Fenrir Fenix You claim to cite videos as proof, yet you say that any videos/film media cited by another person is somehow altered to make it false. No, I said he contradicted himself by condemning me for talking about videos. And generally what i site is a VERY public event, viewed by upwards of 20,000. And I NEVER meant to imply every video is altered. I merely stated that every video CAN be altered. Also, that biography was rather biased towards his mythical status. This pretty much leads me to believe it was altered. that and the fact that if said video was floating around.. i'd would have most likely seen it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:16 pm
It was biased against his 'mythical' status? So, you've seen it?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:21 pm
Fenrir Fenix It was biased against his 'mythical' status? So, you've seen it? I've seen it. It wasn't very objective. It's also rather old. And no, it wasn't against, it was for his mythical status. And i say mythical because he is indeed a mythical figure now. Their are far too many myths about him. Same thing with people like Rickson gracie. There's myths about them, hence they're a mythical character.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 6:14 pm
And in the end, Bruce Lee was pwned by the cerebral edema. I'm sure his cocaine usage didn't help in the matters....
And seriously, Vincent, what the ******** is up with the personal attacks? Even if you were a crew member, which you ******** AREN'T, you would ban someone because of mere opinion? There's been a bunch of people in this guild with whom I don't agree with a good number of the time(like Mirko and his worship of Saku....because yannoe, Silva pwnz!)...you don't see me getting ban happy. Same goes with the other crew members.
Man, this is starting to become like the last situation....where the bi guy just up and quit the guild.
j00 ******** betta chill da ******** down hokay mang? I'm fockin' Tony Montana!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 10:45 pm
Bruce-Ganked-Lee and Silva pwnz! My worship of Saku comes from his always exciting fights.. and the fact that he revolutionized the MMA World, using pro-wrestling. That's just ******** bad a**. Oh and Bruce. Saku will beat Silva in their 4th meeting... if it happens haha. You can quote me on it. Oh, and if Igor fights Silva... Silva will lose his King of the LHW title. I have noticed i attract alot of negative energy...lollocaust on lollerskates in a roflcopter!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 8:06 am
lol, omfg you guys.. delmar will get out the chair leg of truth if ya aint careful. Speaking of which I haven't seen that reprobate online recently, he still moving?
Mirko - Yeah I noticed you seem to attract negativity. Mayhap something to do with your somewhat robust attitude? What number account are ya on now?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 12:15 pm
And I'm back.
With a lack of place to post this "I'm back post..." It'll take me a while just to catch up. Things have been hectic lately, and due to some personal issues, I have taken a vacation of a sort until now.
Now I know as much as Del detests Aikido..heh here's a little bit of an ad for my dojo... www.isshinkan.com Just finished making the website from not long ago.
Will be catching up and posting something substantial soon. And I have stories to share. Oh yes...stories...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 7:02 pm
Vincent Darkholme Mirko_Filipovic Also, best knee and fist fighter? I highly doubt you can make said claim unless you go fight amatuer or professional in Muay Thai bouts. I think having broken a man's jaw in three differnt places with atlernating strikes of my rigth knee and elbow qualifiy me for one of the best I KNOW. Big, captial letters there, for empisis. Oh and Lee would take down whats his face with his first chance to do a side kick, which using a pressure scale was rated to his with 10,000 PSI of force. Lee's kciks were akin to getting hit by a midsized car doing EIGHTY. In my style of fighting it doesnt matter how hard or fast you can kick, force an speed is such an impartial part of martial arts, and alot of people dont get that an jus build on that, he may kick hard but if he misses that strength has to go somewhere, while my leg nicely goes to break his support leg, not saying that i could take on Burce Lee, but saying that anyone who relies on strength and speed alone isnt a very good fighter.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|