|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 3:35 pm
man.. induction = c section. well that was my case. the "induction" really did nothing of any consequence. i was having contractions and my water had broken... but there really was no reason for all of that. i mean i'd expected it to come down to a c section since my aunt's first baby was that way, because she lacked contractions and her blood pressure was way high... the drip didn't work for her either. its just another thing they stick in you at the hospital.
all in all... it wasn't bad. i had no reaction to that, my baby had no reaction to it. babies come when they want, whether doctors try to force it of not. good luck... if it will make you and the doctor feel better about it all... go ahead and get induced. it will certainly speed up the process.. you'll be stuck in the hospital until that baby comes out!
everyone reacts differently to pregnancy. mine was painless. entirely. until afterwards.. that sucked.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:57 pm
all 5 of my kids were induced, it is the only way I've gotten to experience labor and delivery. Some doctors prefer to start it in the evening, and some like to do it in the morning before they start their day at the office. I had two of them scheduled for 4-4:30 one scheduled for lunch time and the other two for the crack of dawn at 7 am. With my last child, after several days of labor and the pip drip and having contractions for over 3 weeks before I was admitted, they finally decided to do a C-Section because he was starting to go into distress. If I had a choice, I would definitely stay with induction versus C-Section. The recovery time differences are unbelievable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
