Welcome to Gaia! ::

Hm, at first I thought that putting the names in the magazine were against the womens' consent. I support this though, even if I'll never be able to sign it.

EDIT: I just noticed that I typed "supprot" instead of "support".

I doubt I'd sign it--abortion is a very personal and private issue, I think.


Oh, and if anyone's interested:CBN Thread on the Article

I say, hey, what's wrong with it? What's so wrong about declaring it?

Prolifers now can call people sluts, whores, and hell-bent hussies by NAME

Prochoicers can now applaud those with the gall to publically declare it.

Which reminds me,

GO OCTOBER CROSSSSSS!!!!

The CBN misinterpreted it or are being idiots - they're saying it's woman who believe abortion caused DAMAGE to their lives -.-

Someone even said "their consciences should stop them from publishing it." Bull, that's assumption of universal morality.

Eh, if I'd have an abortion I'd probably put my name on it. I live in California, in a fairly liberal place, and wouldn't really have to worry toooo much about rabid fundamentalists unless they're rabid fundamentalist hitmen from the South, come to get me in CA. If I didn't feel safe, I'd probably use an alias.

And I don't see why a supposedly feminist magazine would have to post from women who feel damaged from their abortion, especially if they're known to be pro-choice.

If they surveyed and asked for quotes, or a petition for women who've given birth, and love their children, would they be required to then compile another petition of women from hated their children and suffered from post partum depression? Hell no. But for abortion... Jeez.