|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:21 pm
Yahiko_Meoshine Cagalli Yura Attha but you can't really muffle the sound of a Heavy Bolter, can you? This is true but it wouldn't be cost effective if you look at it like a real life army. Why arm your scouts with huge expensive guns when they aren't going to use them all too much? I heard this somewhere, but i forget where "I'd rather have one and not need it, than need one and not have it"
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 9:50 am
how could you not anything about them there like the ingusitors (parden the spelling) priavte army there small in numbers bu the make up for it in weapons and armor they are the ones that are called in when even the famous ultra marines can't cut it.
i would know im crazy about them sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 9:55 pm
DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine Cagalli Yura Attha but you can't really muffle the sound of a Heavy Bolter, can you? This is true but it wouldn't be cost effective if you look at it like a real life army. Why arm your scouts with huge expensive guns when they aren't going to use them all too much? I heard this somewhere, but i forget where "I'd rather have one and not need it, than need one and not have it" Yes but it wouldn't be cost effective.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 9:57 pm
Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine Cagalli Yura Attha but you can't really muffle the sound of a Heavy Bolter, can you? This is true but it wouldn't be cost effective if you look at it like a real life army. Why arm your scouts with huge expensive guns when they aren't going to use them all too much? I heard this somewhere, but i forget where "I'd rather have one and not need it, than need one and not have it" Yes but it wouldn't be cost effective. Better than losing the whole squad to one lightly armored tank. That would cost a hell of alot more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 9:58 pm
DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine Cagalli Yura Attha but you can't really muffle the sound of a Heavy Bolter, can you? This is true but it wouldn't be cost effective if you look at it like a real life army. Why arm your scouts with huge expensive guns when they aren't going to use them all too much? I heard this somewhere, but i forget where "I'd rather have one and not need it, than need one and not have it" Yes but it wouldn't be cost effective. Better than losing the whole squad to one lightly armored tank. That would cost a hell of alot more. Yes but they are scounts. Say it with me, "scouts." That means they aren't supposed to get into battles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 10:01 pm
Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine Cagalli Yura Attha but you can't really muffle the sound of a Heavy Bolter, can you? This is true but it wouldn't be cost effective if you look at it like a real life army. Why arm your scouts with huge expensive guns when they aren't going to use them all too much? I heard this somewhere, but i forget where "I'd rather have one and not need it, than need one and not have it" Yes but it wouldn't be cost effective. Better than losing the whole squad to one lightly armored tank. That would cost a hell of alot more. Yes but they are scounts. Say it with me, "scouts." That means they aren't supposed to get into battles. DarkElf27 But thats not what scouts are for. the reason they're called "scout" is because theyre supposed to sneak into enemy territory, not leave smoldering tank wrecks exploding and attracting attention. That defeats the whole point of 'scout"ing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 10:01 pm
DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine Cagalli Yura Attha but you can't really muffle the sound of a Heavy Bolter, can you? This is true but it wouldn't be cost effective if you look at it like a real life army. Why arm your scouts with huge expensive guns when they aren't going to use them all too much? I heard this somewhere, but i forget where "I'd rather have one and not need it, than need one and not have it" Yes but it wouldn't be cost effective. Better than losing the whole squad to one lightly armored tank. That would cost a hell of alot more. Yes but they are scounts. Say it with me, "scouts." That means they aren't supposed to get into battles. DarkElf27 But thats not what scouts are for. the reason they're called "scout" is because theyre supposed to sneak into enemy territory, not leave smoldering tank wrecks exploding and attracting attention. That defeats the whole point of 'scout"ing. Exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 10:04 pm
Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine Cagalli Yura Attha but you can't really muffle the sound of a Heavy Bolter, can you? This is true but it wouldn't be cost effective if you look at it like a real life army. Why arm your scouts with huge expensive guns when they aren't going to use them all too much? I heard this somewhere, but i forget where "I'd rather have one and not need it, than need one and not have it" Yes but it wouldn't be cost effective. Better than losing the whole squad to one lightly armored tank. That would cost a hell of alot more. Yes but they are scounts. Say it with me, "scouts." That means they aren't supposed to get into battles. DarkElf27 But thats not what scouts are for. the reason they're called "scout" is because theyre supposed to sneak into enemy territory, not leave smoldering tank wrecks exploding and attracting attention. That defeats the whole point of 'scout"ing. Exactly. A heavy bolter is alot lighter than a RL. If they are forced to kill a tank if they are discovered, they need to have as light a load as possible for escaping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:35 am
DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine Cagalli Yura Attha but you can't really muffle the sound of a Heavy Bolter, can you? This is true but it wouldn't be cost effective if you look at it like a real life army. Why arm your scouts with huge expensive guns when they aren't going to use them all too much? I heard this somewhere, but i forget where "I'd rather have one and not need it, than need one and not have it" Yes but it wouldn't be cost effective. Better than losing the whole squad to one lightly armored tank. That would cost a hell of alot more. Yes but they are scounts. Say it with me, "scouts." That means they aren't supposed to get into battles. DarkElf27 But thats not what scouts are for. the reason they're called "scout" is because theyre supposed to sneak into enemy territory, not leave smoldering tank wrecks exploding and attracting attention. That defeats the whole point of 'scout"ing. Exactly. A heavy bolter is alot lighter than a RL. If they are forced to kill a tank if they are discovered, they need to have as light a load as possible for escaping. Being armed wiith Heavy Bolters is fine. Just the Rocket Launcher idea is a lil' much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 3:21 pm
Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine Cagalli Yura Attha but you can't really muffle the sound of a Heavy Bolter, can you? This is true but it wouldn't be cost effective if you look at it like a real life army. Why arm your scouts with huge expensive guns when they aren't going to use them all too much? I heard this somewhere, but i forget where "I'd rather have one and not need it, than need one and not have it" Yes but it wouldn't be cost effective. Better than losing the whole squad to one lightly armored tank. That would cost a hell of alot more. Yes but they are scounts. Say it with me, "scouts." That means they aren't supposed to get into battles. DarkElf27 But thats not what scouts are for. the reason they're called "scout" is because theyre supposed to sneak into enemy territory, not leave smoldering tank wrecks exploding and attracting attention. That defeats the whole point of 'scout"ing. Exactly. A heavy bolter is alot lighter than a RL. If they are forced to kill a tank if they are discovered, they need to have as light a load as possible for escaping. Being armed wiith Heavy Bolters is fine. Just the Rocket Launcher idea is a lil' much. H=Thasts waht i said at the beginning, remember? xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 3:44 pm
DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 Yahiko_Meoshine Cagalli Yura Attha but you can't really muffle the sound of a Heavy Bolter, can you? This is true but it wouldn't be cost effective if you look at it like a real life army. Why arm your scouts with huge expensive guns when they aren't going to use them all too much? I heard this somewhere, but i forget where "I'd rather have one and not need it, than need one and not have it" Yes but it wouldn't be cost effective. Better than losing the whole squad to one lightly armored tank. That would cost a hell of alot more. Yes but they are scounts. Say it with me, "scouts." That means they aren't supposed to get into battles. DarkElf27 But thats not what scouts are for. the reason they're called "scout" is because theyre supposed to sneak into enemy territory, not leave smoldering tank wrecks exploding and attracting attention. That defeats the whole point of 'scout"ing. Exactly. A heavy bolter is alot lighter than a RL. If they are forced to kill a tank if they are discovered, they need to have as light a load as possible for escaping. Being armed wiith Heavy Bolters is fine. Just the Rocket Launcher idea is a lil' much. H=Thasts waht i said at the beginning, remember? xd Uhhh......nope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 3:45 pm
YEs, i was against there being a rocket launcehr, remember?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 3:46 pm
DarkElf27 YEs, i was against there being a rocket launcehr, remember? Uhhh....nope....still nope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 3:47 pm
Yahiko_Meoshine DarkElf27 YEs, i was against there being a rocket launcehr, remember? Uhhh....nope....still nope. *sigh* DarkElf27 But thats not what scouts are for. the reason they're called "scout" is because theyre supposed to sneak into enemy territory, not leave smoldering tank wrecks exploding and attracting attention. That defeats the whole point of 'scout"ing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:26 pm
damonhunters are neat, and i love the grey knights...  mallius inquisitor lord (the two power weapons represent lightning claws, but i modeled them as swords as i think claws dont fit his angelic theme)  Grey knight grand master the grey knights though are so expensive...if you think about it, their land raiders are cheap in relation to the rest of the chapter. i do love the holocaust power, especially since you can use it in combat..blows apart lots of troops which is good, as gray knights are so few
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
