|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:42 pm
Shanna66 math an science go together. check out equations and theories for the universe but if it were't for math, there would be no science... so all science is really just mathamatics.... and not really a sepereate set of theroies and beliefs.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 4:05 pm
it_landry Shanna66 math an science go together. check out equations and theories for the universe but if it were't for math, there would be no science... so all science is really just mathamatics.... and not really a sepereate set of theroies and beliefs. not always. chemical reactions, how organisms react to their environment, even sociology are not math. but chemical reactions were once thought of as magic
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:25 am
it_landry Shanna66 math an science go together. check out equations and theories for the universe but if it were't for math, there would be no science... so all science is really just mathamatics.... and not really a sepereate set of theroies and beliefs. That's actually not true at all. Quantum Physics for example. What about Quantum Catholicism? Theoretical sciences, all of it. Science is not just math. There is more to science than math.... but science does use math as a mechanism to quantify its beliefs and theories. Science isn't THE ONLY PROVABLE thing in the universe, the only method of truth. That is a haughty claim. We cannot rely upon science because there are just some things that science cannot quantify... because even at the theoretical science (quantum physics and beyond) levels, it is all just theories and beliefs, with very little laws to reinforce them, therefore it is not really tried-and-true science. And science yet it is. And science it has gone beyond... And all three of those statements are true simultaneously. It is true that science and math go hand-in-hand, but that does not mean that science=math and math=science. They are coupled, but still individual entities entirely. At some level, mathematics uses science to prove itself and at the same time science uses math to reinforce itself. What do you have to say about what I talked about earlier, with shamanism and meditation (time honored metaphysical customs) being explainable through science? I would really like to hear your opinion on that sort of thing instead of making things up.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:27 am
Shanna66 it_landry Shanna66 math an science go together. check out equations and theories for the universe but if it were't for math, there would be no science... so all science is really just mathamatics.... and not really a sepereate set of theroies and beliefs. not always. chemical reactions, how organisms react to their environment, even sociology are not math. but chemical reactions were once thought of as magic Agreed. Sociology is a science that has very little to do with math, of all of the sciences. Most of the math involved with Sociology is statistics, which is not what is solely relied upon, nor even heavily relied upon in about half of the cases. Math is a language everyone can understand, but it is not everything, and it is not the sole truth.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 12:05 am
ahh, but if there are sciences seperate from maths... then why do we in using that scince, give the properties of it mathematical names and references... with out math, there would be no sciences... even the chemicals have a mathematical references to make it easier to catagorize them. with out math, there would be no science.... it has been proven time and time again. even Logic and Philosophy has bases in math...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 12:51 pm
it_landry ahh, but if there are sciences seperate from maths... then why do we in using that scince, give the properties of it mathematical names and references... with out math, there would be no sciences... even the chemicals have a mathematical references to make it easier to catagorize them. with out math, there would be no science.... it has been proven time and time again. even Logic and Philosophy has bases in math... and as we pointed out, not all science requiers math. and for a very few select things, we only use math terms with them to make it easier to understand
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:11 pm
Shanna66 it_landry ahh, but if there are sciences seperate from maths... then why do we in using that scince, give the properties of it mathematical names and references... with out math, there would be no sciences... even the chemicals have a mathematical references to make it easier to catagorize them. with out math, there would be no science.... it has been proven time and time again. even Logic and Philosophy has bases in math... and as we pointed out, not all science requiers math. and for a very few select things, we only use math terms with them to make it easier to understand yes, you told me with your chemical reactions... and yet if the chemicals mixed had been done differently, say a different amount of one of the chemicals... the reaction would be different, so the chemical reactions are deteremined by mathamatics... and sociology has math connections to... each example of a person creates a different combination to the socity you are studing... a mathamatically equation is commonly used as part of sociology, in fact, a few mathamatic equations were made by professors of sociology, just for their research.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:22 pm
Have you ever taken a sociology class? I took one last semester... a 110 class and I never ran into the stuff you're talking about. Logic and philosophy have nothing to do with math. There are mathematical philosophies, but philosophy itself does not rely upon it at all unless that is the topic at hand.
But anyway, what if magic or mystic practices could be quantified in a mathematical manner, just like the meditation techniques and shamanistic practices are? What about this?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:28 pm
And yes I'm sure there are mathematical equations for sociology, but these sociologists are a different branch of it and they use statistics. This particular branch relies heavily upon math because the data is quantitative, not qualitative (Quantity not quality for those who don't understand). But sociology is so much more than that. History, archaeology, mythology, world cultures, ancient cultures, politics, even music are topics studied heavily under sociology. They have their own names, and sure there are math problems in them, but math is not the bulk of these sciences. The bulk of these soft sciences (non-math heavy sciences like sociology and philosophy, psychology, etc) is made up of text not equations. The data is mostly, primarily qualitative. There is a theory that using magic is simply improving your odds that it will happen, that particles spin in one direction or the other, and when you are using these "mystic" rituals, etc, you are increasing your probability that they will spin a certain way, either in your favor or against it. Seems pretty scientific, doesn't it?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:04 pm
according to him, what it sounds like he is saying and im just putting it in a different senario or whatever some math is used in magic right? so that must mean that all magic relies on math. because even though we may only use math for statistics in some things then that means that those things are entirely based on math. im just trying to make sence of what he said. cause thats what it sounds like
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:13 pm
magic is nothing but science! well, i think it is unexplained science. i was reading through the whole thing. shanna and lilamalvae have good points sorry it_landry, you seem like your holding on to a dying argument. your points dont really make sence or even argue anything good. they just try and fail to turn around the other's words. statistics do not mean that it is based on math rolleyes
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:54 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:17 pm
np, i read it and it just got om my nerves. sorry. and thank you whee
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:56 am
You want an answer out of me? I'll take it straight from the poll. I honestly don't know. =/
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:26 pm
All that exists has an explaination, we just have yet to find it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|