|
|
| Am i right?! |
| Wow! I never thought of that! |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| Yes your right. |
|
31% |
[ 9 ] |
| Your wrong. |
|
31% |
[ 9 ] |
| Um...... |
|
34% |
[ 10 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 5:55 pm
OutkasTeen but thats why god with science works, god gave us the materials to be succesful, heads, enough arms, etc. and science explains what happened, and god explains how and why it happened But the reason [I think.] that that example doesn't work is 'cause you wouldn't know if that type of 'human' would or wouldn't work, because they'd live in a completely different environment and etc, so they might or might not adapt in different ways. And even if they did live in the same environment or world or whatever, we still wouldn't know because they don't exist. xD; Just seems like a coupla loopholes to meh. u_u;
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 5:07 pm
game_guy_4321 hi i have created four questions that will disprove science textbooks on evolution (we may look different from adam and eve but because of radiation) and the theory of the big bang. 1. If we evovled from apes, why are apes still around? 2. Where did the material for the Big Bang come from? 3. Where did the first cell come from? 4. Where did water, and air come from if space is airless? i apologize for my typing i am extremely excited about this! reply however you wish. Hi 5!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LearningtoBreath63 Vice Captain
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 5:47 pm
Crazy Knife Bap OutkasTeen but thats why god with science works, god gave us the materials to be succesful, heads, enough arms, etc. and science explains what happened, and god explains how and why it happened But the reason [I think.] that that example doesn't work is 'cause you wouldn't know if that type of 'human' would or wouldn't work, because they'd live in a completely different environment and etc, so they might or might not adapt in different ways. And even if they did live in the same environment or world or whatever, we still wouldn't know because they don't exist. xD; Just seems like a coupla loopholes to meh. u_u; well ya, but if the environment was different, than god would have made us differently, like i said, science only shows us what happened, how god did it, but god was the one who did it, thats what i believe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 5:49 pm
Ginger Snapple Scientists love to play with that type of stuff.
I read a wonderful book that my mom is using for Sunday school (let me see if I can get the title).
It doesnt say that science is wrong as much as it says that God and science go hand-in-hand. It explains that the creation of the universe was delicate, too big or too small it would collapse on itself. It also explains that the plants in our solar system serve a purpose for life on earth. The gas giants actually protect earth from space debrie (you'll have to excuse my spelling). It explains that without the gas giants we would be bombarded with metors and such much more often. It also explains that a single DNA being created is a very delicate and rare chance to just happen. Basically, it says science has the facts, they just think that they are facts and nothing else. God is the one who gave us all the sutible conditions for life, and he created us, and he created conditions sutible for us to live it. Some people may see science as disproving God, when it actually supports him. So many chances are very unlikely to occur without divine intervention.
The book is Off the Edge by Adam Fransisco thats so true, science isn't wrong, science and god do go hand in hand
|
|
|
|
|
|
LearningtoBreath63 Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 7:14 pm
OutkasTeen well ya, but if the environment was different, than god would have made us differently, like i said, science only shows us what happened, how god did it, but god was the one who did it, thats what i believe Okay, I think I see what you're saying. xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 7:17 pm
Crazy Knife Bap OutkasTeen well ya, but if the environment was different, than god would have made us differently, like i said, science only shows us what happened, how god did it, but god was the one who did it, thats what i believe Okay, I think I see what you're saying. xD ya, its not that science is wrong, its that god is science, in a way, we shouldn't worship science, but god gave us suitible living conditions and gave us the right adaptations for life
|
|
|
|
|
|
LearningtoBreath63 Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 7:21 pm
OutkasTeen Crazy Knife Bap OutkasTeen well ya, but if the environment was different, than god would have made us differently, like i said, science only shows us what happened, how god did it, but god was the one who did it, thats what i believe Okay, I think I see what you're saying. xD ya, its not that science is wrong, its that god is science, in a way, we shouldn't worship science, but god gave us suitible living conditions and gave us the right adaptations for life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 3:32 pm
I think you should not try to prove science false. You should test their radical theories and questions. In first Timothy 1:5 it tells to stay away from things which minister questions than faith. We should try to harmonize the two and show that God made everything. We should use science to prove it. When science starts contridicting God, that is when we need to prove science false. All science should not be the target.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LearningtoBreath63 Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 8:00 pm
Imotoku I think you should not try to prove science false. You should test their radical theories and questions. In first Timothy 1:5 it tells to stay away from things which minister questions than faith. We should try to harmonize the two and show that God made everything. We should use science to prove it. When science starts contridicting God, that is when we need to prove science false. All science should not be the target. exactly, science+god= a really good reality
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 10:28 pm
My science teacher got into this throughly... v.v
He says that Scientists only explain the scientifical events that lead up AFTER the big bang. It is purely Religion that takes hold from the Big bang and beyond.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:08 pm
Eh, why not? I'll give a crack at it... game_guy_4321 hi i have created four questions that will disprove science textbooks on evolution (we may look different from adam and eve but because of radiation) and the theory of the big bang. 1. If we evovled from apes, why are apes still around? 2. Where did the material for the Big Bang come from? 3. Where did the first cell come from? 4. Where did water, and air come from if space is airless? i apologize for my typing i am extremely excited about this! reply however you wish. 1. Chimpanzees, specifically. And the reason is that Evolution is an alteration where it is needed, primarily when an Organism or group moves location. Teh Chimpanzees stayed in the same place, Homo Sapiens moved. 2. everything. All Matter in the Universe has a Gravitational Pull, which would inevitable pull everything together into a tight cluster of matter. For an example of what I'm talking about, you may want to look up the Oscillating Universe Theory. 3. Origin of Species. Theory states that numerous Proteins gathered to form teh Nuclei of a cell which started to reproduce, forming Amoeba, which started evolving into different cellular structures and organisms(theoretically). 4. False. Space is a Vacuum, yes, as Vacuum is defined as carrying lower pressure than Atmospheric, but a "Perfect Vacuum" is merely philisophical, as quantum theory predicts that no space is perfectly empty. You will find plenty of matter in space, however even if not, it still does not disprove. I have a Cup. There is not any water in it. So how can there be Water? There still is, what's your point?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 4:37 pm
just keep in mind that god made everything and he made humans as humans, we didn't change over time! god made adam and eve out of dirt, not monkeys, and earth was made by god, not pieces of space...
god made everything with nothing...
science is very good, i love science, it saves peoples lives and helps us get further solutions to problems.
so be against those theories, not science...
AND NOBODY WILL EVER PROVE GOD WRONG
that is a verse in the bible (not sure which one) so no matter how hard they try, it won't work...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LearningtoBreath63 Vice Captain
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:39 pm
Christ_Owns My science teacher got into this throughly... v.v He says that Scientists only explain the scientifical events that lead up AFTER the big bang. It is purely Religion that takes hold from the Big bang and beyond.Ya, but that's only if you believe in the Big Bang which is only a theory. I'm not saying that the Big Bang couldn't be true, but what your teacher said would be wrong because God had a part in creating us and the earth and the heavens. I'm not saying the big bang couldn't be true, but God was around before creation and had a hand in creation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:34 pm
BandFreakJo just keep in mind that god made everything and he made humans as humans, we didn't change over time! god made adam and eve out of dirt, not monkeys, and earth was made by god, not pieces of space... god made everything with nothing... science is very good, i love science, it saves peoples lives and helps us get further solutions to problems. so be against those theories, not science... AND NOBODY WILL EVER PROVE GOD WRONG that is a verse in the bible (not sure which one) so no matter how hard they try, it won't work... So, be against the theories, even though every one of the theories could fit just as well with the Christian Theology? Yes, Man was made from teh Dust of teh Earth, but so were apes. It's a simple matter to alter the genome after construction to make your creation look a little more...you. And yes, Mankind haschanged over teh past few millenia, why do you think everyones different? If it started out with two people, and there was no change in genetics from those two people, then everyone would look exactly the same. But, seeing as that isn't the case...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 12:07 pm
Se Ga Takai BandFreakJo just keep in mind that god made everything and he made humans as humans, we didn't change over time! god made adam and eve out of dirt, not monkeys, and earth was made by god, not pieces of space... god made everything with nothing... science is very good, i love science, it saves peoples lives and helps us get further solutions to problems. so be against those theories, not science... AND NOBODY WILL EVER PROVE GOD WRONG that is a verse in the bible (not sure which one) so no matter how hard they try, it won't work... So, be against the theories, even though every one of the theories could fit just as well with the Christian Theology? Yes, Man was made from teh Dust of teh Earth, but so were apes. It's a simple matter to alter the genome after construction to make your creation look a little more...you. And yes, Mankind haschanged over teh past few millenia, why do you think everyones different? If it started out with two people, and there was no change in genetics from those two people, then everyone would look exactly the same. But, seeing as that isn't the case... Lota claims. Proof please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
