|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 6:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 7:23 pm
I don't know... someone in my GSA read it
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 7:33 pm
BakaTulip I don't know... someone in my GSA read it Ask for a copy of the article and see if you can post it here, I want to read it. This experiment sounds a little odd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:25 pm
BakaTulip Wolf Kazumaru I dislike making short posts, but anyway... Ahem.SCIENCE SEZ U CAN ONLEE BE 1 SO PIK SYDES LOLO!!11!!noodle~!!! [/sarcasm] ... You are now my God. Edit: Pain makes Wolfie slow. :/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:38 pm
I believe science is wrong about a number of things.
Guys can be bisexual.
I know a guy who gets aroused by the thought of having a**l intercourse with a man,
And the thought of having intercourse with a woman.
mad D
I love saying intercourse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:00 pm
Bob Master of ALL Spoons I believe science is wrong about a number of things. It's not science that's wrong: It's the people who do the tests aren't thurough OR they're skewing the results OR ******** the test up negating all results. The thing is, pure science itself can't be wrong, as it's how the universe works. The people who misinterpret it or get it wrong, however, can be, and THAT is where the problem lies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 3:36 am
Perhaps it hasn't to do purely with psysical arousal. Perhaps the personality of the person would matter more than their pysical gender or appearance.
I find the 'bisexuality is impossible, pick one!' argument to be biased and ignorant in most cases. This, obviously, not being one of those cases, but none the less, I feel that it is a legitimate sexuality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 6:28 am
Wolf Kazumaru BakaTulip Wolf Kazumaru I dislike making short posts, but anyway... Ahem.SCIENCE SEZ U CAN ONLEE BE 1 SO PIK SYDES LOLO!!11!!noodle~!!! [/sarcasm] ... You are now my God. Edit: Pain makes Wolfie slow. :/ *feels almighty and powerful* XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:05 pm
Wishbone Redemption Perhaps it hasn't to do purely with psysical arousal. Perhaps the personality of the person would matter more than their pysical gender or appearance. I find the 'bisexuality is impossible, pick one!' argument to be biased and ignorant in most cases. This, obviously, not being one of those cases, but none the less, I feel that it is a legitimate sexuality. I will agree with you on this, and I will also agree with Kohki that Science is never wrong, but it's interpretation can be misconstrewed (is that a real word?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 3:03 am
Tenaku Wishbone Redemption Perhaps it hasn't to do purely with psysical arousal. Perhaps the personality of the person would matter more than their pysical gender or appearance. I find the 'bisexuality is impossible, pick one!' argument to be biased and ignorant in most cases. This, obviously, not being one of those cases, but none the less, I feel that it is a legitimate sexuality. I will agree with you on this, and I will also agree with Kohki that Science is never wrong, but it's interpretation can be misconstrewed (is that a real word?) Misconstrued I think is how it's spelled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 3:38 am
I've heard about that study before. From what I know about it, it has been considered rather invalid because of the small amount of particapents in the test and other factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:58 pm
I just did a search and found that J. Michael Bailey did a study like that. There's a bit about it on Wikipedia, but I'll see if I can find an actual article. From the sound of it the study doesn't seem accurate at all. The subjects he used were self-selected and there were only 100 of them participating, so it was overall pretty biased. Edit: Fixed the link.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:19 am
Results mean nothing unless oserved several times.
Unless, and until, the experiment is repeated multiple times, the reslts gained mean nothing. Only then, once you have numerous sets of data, can you compare them and reach an acceptable conclusion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 11:59 am
Kohki Tenaku Wishbone Redemption Perhaps it hasn't to do purely with psysical arousal. Perhaps the personality of the person would matter more than their pysical gender or appearance. I find the 'bisexuality is impossible, pick one!' argument to be biased and ignorant in most cases. This, obviously, not being one of those cases, but none the less, I feel that it is a legitimate sexuality. I will agree with you on this, and I will also agree with Kohki that Science is never wrong, but it's interpretation can be misconstrewed (is that a real word?) Misconstrued I think is how it's spelled. Thank you kohki *bows to the almighty-ish-ness-icity that is Kohki*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:35 pm
Bob Master of ALL Spoons I believe science is wrong about a number of things.
Guys can be bisexual.
I know a guy who gets aroused by the thought of having a**l intercourse with a man,
And the thought of having intercourse with a woman.
mad D
I love saying intercourse. hehe mee too.... only you're not saying it... you're typing it... whatever. i know a few bisexual guys who get aroused by both... how many men did they test?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
