Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply The Pro-life Guild
J'ai FINI Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Ava R.

3,500 Points
  • Gaian 50
  • Treasure Hunter 100
  • Hygienic 200
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 1:55 pm


Hear, hear!
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:29 pm


Right on!

Pro-Lifers can't be feminists (or gay)? And they call us closed minded.

I.Am
Captain

Quotable Tycoon

7,825 Points
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
  • Signature Look 250
  • Forum Regular 100

Tiger of the Fire

PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 3:17 pm


We're not gunna take it!
LO! We aint gunna take it!
We're not gunna take it ANY MORE!


Sorry, that was the first thing to come to my mind when I read that.

Oh, Miranda, I'm not sure if you're kidding or not. I'm not sure how much you knwo about the NRA, but comments liek that, especialy after postign somthign as beautiful as you did, and then to smake a group you don't agree with like that, mkes you look like a hypocrit.

http://www.nra.org/Default.aspx You can check out there media archives and current media. They do indeed give reports of when crime rates involving guns are on the rise or ebb. Although...most of the reports stress a need for fire arms for the people who were affected negativly by the crime. Alot of the stuff is on britian. SInce baning guns the country saw a sharp rise in crimes involving fire arms.

Washington DC has soem of the strictest gun laws in the US, its illigle to own one there form what I understand, but they also have soem of the highest gun crime rates in the US. This is quite debatable, but belongs in another thread, perhaps in the ED sexion of the guild.
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 3:25 pm


Beware the Jabberwock
Talon-chan
In the pro-choice guild I've made no promises to be kind with my opinion. Here I have. So if I've offended you there, know that I am mostly venting to people with similar views as myself... just as you here when you vent may say things that to pro-choicers make just as little sense and seem just as snarky.

Oh please, it's not the venting, it's the bashing with no purpose. Bashing not being "Oh they suck" but things like "Oh they can't be feminist". Please, oh please tell me why I need an abortion doctor to be equal to a man, I'd really like to know.

But of course you don't really post that in the pro-choice guild, just that we can't be feminist. You don't mind degrading us, but you won't give us a reason for doing it.
I've given my opinion on it before in the past... in this guild no less. So I think it's misleading to say I "won't" give you a reason when I have.

The argument went as follows (If I remember correctly):

1) Feminists support women's rights.
2)Pro-choicers consider "the right to an abortion" to be one of many rights a woman is owed.
Conclusion: To a pro-choicer... Pro-life feminists support women's rights except where they don't, which is hypocritical (you can't say you're for women's rights when you explicity say you aren't for some of them).

1) Feminists support women's rights.
2) Pro-lifers don't believe that the right to an abortion falls under the catagory of "women's rights."
Conclusion: To you being pro-life feminist makes perfect sense because you are in support of all rights you believe a woman ought to have.

It has nothing to do with being equal to a man and everything to do with supporting women's rights. The crux of the argument is whether or not abortion falls under "women's rights" and not whether or not "abortion makes you equal to a man."

I imagine as a feminist you feel all women ought to have a right to be given proper prenatal care, yes? Or how about it is a woman's right to have proper femine care available to her (such as breast/ovarian/uterine cancer treatment, properly trained gynochologists, etc). How is having prenatal care, breast/ovarian/uterine cancer treatment being available to you work towards making you equal to a man? It doesn't. You don't need prenatal care, breast/ovarian/uterine cancer treatment available to be equal to a man because a man does not need prenatal care, breast/ovarian/uterine cancer treatement ever in his life (since he can't get pregnant, have uterine cancer, or have ovarian cancer... though it is possible to get breast cancer, breast cancer treatment provided to women is vastly different than for men from my understanding).

You don't need certain things to be equal to a man. But you are owed certain things as rights because you are a woman. Well trained gynochologists, prenatal care, breast cancer treatment, ovarian and uterine cancer research and treatment, all of these things existing and being available to you are your right. You can't be a feminist and be against research that cures woman's diseases just because research in those diseases isn't needed to make you equal to a man. In the same way, to a pro-choicer, if you are against abortions you are against something they believe is an integral part of a woman's rights regardless of whether or not it makes her equal to a man.

Talon-chan


Penguin Spoon

PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 3:42 pm


Talon-chan
In the pro-choice guild I've made no promises to be kind with my opinion. Here I have. So if I've offended you there, know that I am mostly venting to people with similar views as myself... just as you here when you vent may say things that to pro-choicers make just as little sense and seem just as snarky.


Please Talon. You are an intelligent person as youve shown to a large degree in the few comments with content Ive read from you. You KNOW that the pro-choice side, at least on these boards, are extremely rude in their guild as well in the abortion thread in ED. Ive been told things like "your argument is stupid" and "oh come on, just leave this argument" and "LOL PENGUIN SPOON IS BATTING 0.000! LOL" and have been treated to the false kindness which to me is even ruder when you say "well clearly you are wrong, dear." and "oh honey you have alot to learn!" This condescening additude is even worse than the extreme amounts of baseless sarcasm attacking me and my wife. Ive been put on an ignore list for questioning the crediblity of a source. That is beyond childish. Ive been held to a double standard by your side here and abroad. Look at our guild, the few here that are incesently rude are not supported by the vast majority of us, yet, if you look at the open pro-choice guild and the abortion thread, you will see it FILLED with childish sarcasm. Not only do they attack specific members here and look down on our movement as inferior intelectually and morally in the most condescening ways, they also mock the very subject with their "LOL I CAN EAT 40 FETUSES LOL" and "OMG D00D LOOK A FETUS COOKIE LMAO." Whether or not you are pro-choice or pro-life you should at least respect the issue, as it IS a question of human rights, and at least respect the others side by not mocking what we hold as another human being. It is rude. And this doesnt just happen in their guild, but it happens frequently in the abortion debate thread you started. I suggest you visit it in once in a while to moderate what is going on there.

In another forum the pro-choice side found my wifes livejournal through some serious interenet detective-ness and posted her rants to try and discredit her. They not only harped on the idea for 30-40 posts, but they spammed every topic she posted in with "SEE WHAT SHE SAID ABOUT HER MOTHER WHAT A BAD PERSON!" They also made a ridiculous "photoshop" attacking Lymelady by putting "lyme b***h" onto a strange looking sculpture thing. They also posted Pryos personal...endevours when it had nothing to do with abortion. You dont see these tactics very often coming from a pro-lifer. Its begining to make me think that the pro-choice movement has less to do with reproductive rights and more to do with a certain mindset that allows for these uncalled for additudes. We give your side respect by not calling you baby killers and self-centered, it is only fair you give us the same respect.

I personally agree with most liberal stances, excluding abortion of course, and would consider myself liberal if it wasnt for the consistant method of "debate" that I see liberals use. From internet forums to movie makers to internet posters...liberal across the board put themselves across in such a childish manner. "LOL GEROGE BUSH IS A MONKEY LMAO" being one of my favorites. I have nothing against liberal viewpoints, conversely I agree with many, but I will never never call myself a liberal because of the way the majority of "liberal-minded" people act. (I remember two "liberal" students who threw pies at Ann Coulter when she gave a speech. The liberal side secretly championed this, and often even openly championed it. I guess the liberal movement still takes their ideas from Nickelodeon.) Pro-choicers being the very worst. And yes, I am fully aware that many conservatives and so forth are pro-choice, but it is concept of taking a liberal stance and arguing like a liberal that creates this additude of no regard.

I am pro-evironment, anti-death penalty, pro-social welfare, pro-gay marriage (even though I dont support it religously), anti-flat tax, and pro-life (edit: oops). For the most part I have liberal ideas, but I do not argue them insultingly.

Thank you for making this thread, because I needed to get this off my chest. I like you Talon, so far from what Ive seen. I have yet to get into a real debate where you dont hold your punches, so Im not sure how polite and issue-orientated you really are. However, I do like you, but I cannot let you say "WELLLL we dont really do that. And being rude is OK as long as you say 'well Im going to be rude now!'" You know as well as I do that there is no justification for rudeness when debating an issue of philosophical consideration. Hell there is no room for rudeness when debating an issue with intellectual consideration of any sort.

I will say however, that there are active pro-choicers who are not extremely rude. There are a few here, but they do exist and Id like to say to them that even if I do not always point it out to you, I want you to know that your politeness is ALWAYS appreciated.
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 3:47 pm


Talon-chan
Beware the Jabberwock
Talon-chan
In the pro-choice guild I've made no promises to be kind with my opinion. Here I have. So if I've offended you there, know that I am mostly venting to people with similar views as myself... just as you here when you vent may say things that to pro-choicers make just as little sense and seem just as snarky.

Oh please, it's not the venting, it's the bashing with no purpose. Bashing not being "Oh they suck" but things like "Oh they can't be feminist". Please, oh please tell me why I need an abortion doctor to be equal to a man, I'd really like to know.

But of course you don't really post that in the pro-choice guild, just that we can't be feminist. You don't mind degrading us, but you won't give us a reason for doing it.
I've given my opinion on it before in the past... in this guild no less. So I think it's misleading to say I "won't" give you a reason when I have.

The argument went as follows (If I remember correctly):

1) Feminists support women's rights.
2)Pro-choicers consider "the right to an abortion" to be one of many rights a woman is owed.
Conclusion: To a pro-choicer... Pro-life feminists support women's rights except where they don't, which is hypocritical (you can't say you're for women's rights when you explicity say you aren't for some of them).

1) Feminists support women's rights.
2) Pro-lifers don't believe that the right to an abortion falls under the catagory of "women's rights."
Conclusion: To you being pro-life feminist makes perfect sense because you are in support of all rights you believe a woman ought to have.

It has nothing to do with being equal to a man and everything to do with supporting women's rights. The crux of the argument is whether or not abortion falls under "women's rights" and not whether or not "abortion makes you equal to a man."

I imagine as a feminist you feel all women ought to have a right to be given proper prenatal care, yes? Or how about it is a woman's right to have proper femine care available to her (such as breast/ovarian/uterine cancer treatment, properly trained gynochologists, etc). How is having prenatal care, breast/ovarian/uterine cancer treatment being available to you work towards making you equal to a man? It doesn't. You don't need prenatal care, breast/ovarian/uterine cancer treatment available to be equal to a man because a man does not need prenatal care, breast/ovarian/uterine cancer treatement ever in his life (since he can't get pregnant, have uterine cancer, or have ovarian cancer... though it is possible to get breast cancer, breast cancer treatment provided to women is vastly different than for men from my understanding).

You don't need certain things to be equal to a man. But you are owed certain things as rights because you are a woman. Well trained gynochologists, prenatal care, breast cancer treatment, ovarian and uterine cancer research and treatment, all of these things existing and being available to you are your right. You can't be a feminist and be against research that cures woman's diseases just because research in those diseases isn't needed to make you equal to a man. In the same way, to a pro-choicer, if you are against abortions you are against something they believe is an integral part of a woman's rights regardless of whether or not it makes her equal to a man.


So, if we, as pro-lifers feel it is unjust to kill a fetus, we can claim that you are commiting a holocaust, and that you cannot be pro-life in any circumstance because you are unjustly killing people?

Just because your view supports a certain idea doesnt mean you can make wild assertions. In the pro-life guild we at least have some understanding that other people have viewpoints different from ours. If you, as a pro-choicer KNOW we do not think abortion is a "woman's right" then how can you claim that we cannot be feminists under our belief system?

Like I said, I dont claim that you are hypocrits for being against murder just because you support other unjust killing, from my point of view. How is it that you can get away with judging us from your point of view but if we did the same, which we dont for the most part, you would smack us down? You see the double standard here, dont you?

Penguin Spoon


McPhee
Crew

Friendly Elocutionist

8,150 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Flatterer 200
  • Popular Thread 100
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 3:57 pm


I was going to say something, but Penguin Spoon said it better than I would've.

*Loves Penguin*

*...In a hetero way.*

By the way, Pyro, what on earth is the use of starting a gun argument in this thread?

...And for that matter, what does "smake" mean? And no, I'm not making fun of you, I just know it's not a word.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:04 pm


Pyrotechnic Oracle
We're not gunna take it!
LO! We aint gunna take it!
We're not gunna take it ANY MORE!


Sorry, that was the first thing to come to my mind when I read that.

Oh, Miranda, I'm not sure if you're kidding or not. I'm not sure how much you knwo about the NRA, but comments liek that, especialy after postign somthign as beautiful as you did, and then to smake a group you don't agree with like that, mkes you look like a hypocrit.

http://www.nra.org/Default.aspx You can check out there media archives and current media. They do indeed give reports of when crime rates involving guns are on the rise or ebb. Although...most of the reports stress a need for fire arms for the people who were affected negativly by the crime. Alot of the stuff is on britian. SInce baning guns the country saw a sharp rise in crimes involving fire arms.

Washington DC has soem of the strictest gun laws in the US, its illigle to own one there form what I understand, but they also have soem of the highest gun crime rates in the US. This is quite debatable, but belongs in another thread, perhaps in the ED sexion of the guild.

I wasn't saying anything about gun users in general, just that the NRA isn't going to publish information that would go against their beliefs, pro-lifers wouldn't either and neither would choicers. It's the way of the world darling, you find thing to support your side, not things to go against it.

So to claim something is biased and unusable because it supports a side, and then to turn around and use information from something that a site that supports the other side, must be equally as biased. I used the NRA as an example because I had just watched an episode of L&O and something like that was briefly mentioned so it stuck in my mind.

Decrepit Faith
Crew

6,100 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Tycoon 200
  • Generous 100

Wisdo

PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:24 pm


*applauds to Penguin Spoon* I could never have said it better.
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:26 pm


OHHHHHH! Geez. Sorry Miranda, very very sorry. I miss read what you typed. I thoguh you said that the NRA would never report crimes and gun correlation. I was already thinking why they woudl do that, seeing as defence is one of their greatest arguments.

Tiger of the Fire


Decrepit Faith
Crew

6,100 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Tycoon 200
  • Generous 100
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:32 pm


Talon-chan
Beware the Jabberwock
Talon-chan
In the pro-choice guild I've made no promises to be kind with my opinion. Here I have. So if I've offended you there, know that I am mostly venting to people with similar views as myself... just as you here when you vent may say things that to pro-choicers make just as little sense and seem just as snarky.

Oh please, it's not the venting, it's the bashing with no purpose. Bashing not being "Oh they suck" but things like "Oh they can't be feminist". Please, oh please tell me why I need an abortion doctor to be equal to a man, I'd really like to know.

But of course you don't really post that in the pro-choice guild, just that we can't be feminist. You don't mind degrading us, but you won't give us a reason for doing it.
I've given my opinion on it before in the past... in this guild no less. So I think it's misleading to say I "won't" give you a reason when I have.

The argument went as follows (If I remember correctly):

1) Feminists support women's rights.
2)Pro-choicers consider "the right to an abortion" to be one of many rights a woman is owed.
Conclusion: To a pro-choicer... Pro-life feminists support women's rights except where they don't, which is hypocritical (you can't say you're for women's rights when you explicity say you aren't for some of them).

1) Feminists support women's rights.
2) Pro-lifers don't believe that the right to an abortion falls under the catagory of "women's rights."
Conclusion: To you being pro-life feminist makes perfect sense because you are in support of all rights you believe a woman ought to have.

It has nothing to do with being equal to a man and everything to do with supporting women's rights. The crux of the argument is whether or not abortion falls under "women's rights" and not whether or not "abortion makes you equal to a man."

I imagine as a feminist you feel all women ought to have a right to be given proper prenatal care, yes? Or how about it is a woman's right to have proper femine care available to her (such as breast/ovarian/uterine cancer treatment, properly trained gynochologists, etc). How is having prenatal care, breast/ovarian/uterine cancer treatment being available to you work towards making you equal to a man? It doesn't. You don't need prenatal care, breast/ovarian/uterine cancer treatment available to be equal to a man because a man does not need prenatal care, breast/ovarian/uterine cancer treatement ever in his life (since he can't get pregnant, have uterine cancer, or have ovarian cancer... though it is possible to get breast cancer, breast cancer treatment provided to women is vastly different than for men from my understanding).

You don't need certain things to be equal to a man. But you are owed certain things as rights because you are a woman. Well trained gynochologists, prenatal care, breast cancer treatment, ovarian and uterine cancer research and treatment, all of these things existing and being available to you are your right. You can't be a feminist and be against research that cures woman's diseases just because research in those diseases isn't needed to make you equal to a man. In the same way, to a pro-choicer, if you are against abortions you are against something they believe is an integral part of a woman's rights regardless of whether or not it makes her equal to a man.

Women should be able to have proper care in terms of health, abortion isn't about health, unless used in those specific instances. Ultrasounds are used to make sure that the child is okay, and alive without any abnomalities. Prenatal care is again, a lot for the child, some is for the mother however once again it's a health issue.

Abortion is a want, not a need. Women need proper cancer and pre-natal care, abortion is something that a woman wants to get (maybe not in a "hip hip horray" type of way but you should know the terms in which I'm speaking, you're smart enough).

I support a woman's right to equality, period. Abortion doesn't make us equal, and it isn't a need, no matter how much you may agree that society should keep abortion legal you've got to have your head pretty far in the clouds to think that abortion is anywhere on par with cancer treatment.

Equality means that you as a woman are entitled to the same things as everyone else, sometimes the things are different, because your body is different, but acting as though part of your body is shameful is not supporting equality. And putting a procedure that is on par with plastic surgery (except for the fact that it kills a human) in the list of a womans "entitlement" is not equality either.

And don't try to argue with me on that either, about jobs and careers and futures. Did you know that 90% of the time that you're more likely to be hired if you're better looking than the other people interviewed? That's straight from sociology class. So obviously being pretty offers you a better future, just like abortion for young girls, right?

We support women's rights until they start killing other people, then they're no longer rights. Twist my words however you want, make it as pretty sounding as you want, tell me that "I support a womans right to decide her future until I don't like the direction she's taking" underneath it all what I said is all there is too it, and the only reason you can't use those words is that it's too scary to think about.

Because what if we're right? Your mind can't process that we could possibly be right and your side could possibly be wrong, in which case you'd be supporting the mass slaughter of people all over, every day, just like Rwanda and just like Germany.

And us "Crazy fundies" are the only people who did anything to try and stop it.

If there's one thing that needs to be aborted it's the psuedo-feminist bullshit.
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:34 pm


Pyrotechnic Oracle
OHHHHHH! Geez. Sorry Miranda, very very sorry. I miss read what you typed. I thoguh you said that the NRA would never report crimes and gun correlation. I was already thinking why they woudl do that, seeing as defence is one of their greatest arguments.

I figured you did. XD

Decrepit Faith
Crew

6,100 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Tycoon 200
  • Generous 100

Tiger of the Fire

PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:57 pm


Ahhhhh....Miranda, you must carry my child!
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:05 pm


Talon-chan
The argument went as follows (If I remember correctly):

1) Feminists support women's rights.
2)Pro-choicers consider "the right to an abortion" to be one of many rights a woman is owed.
Conclusion: To a pro-choicer... Pro-life feminists support women's rights except where they don't, which is hypocritical (you can't say you're for women's rights when you explicity say you aren't for some of them).

1) Feminists support women's rights.
2) Pro-lifers don't believe that the right to an abortion falls under the catagory of "women's rights."
Conclusion: To you being pro-life feminist makes perfect sense because you are in support of all rights you believe a woman ought to have.

It has nothing to do with being equal to a man and everything to do with supporting women's rights.
I'm probably restating what Mira and Spoon have already said, but...

You admit knowledge that, from the Pro-Life point of view, it makes perfect sense to be Pro-Life and a feminist. So why would you ever say that they couldn't be?

From your point of view that's one of the rights of a woman. But then, there are Pro-Lifers who believe that abortion in the case of rape is okay, but I don't. Does that mean those Pro-Lifers aren't really Pro-Lifers? No. It just means they have a different set of criteria for "Sufficient danger to the mother's health."

Inversely, there are Pro-Choicers who would have abortion available up to the head exiting the birth canal. But, I think it was you at least, have said that you believe personhood to begin before that. Does that make you not Pro-Choice, because you would refuse abortion (except in rare cases) after a certain point?

Last, I was fairly certain that Feminism is about making women equal to men, not give them more rights then men. Breast/uterian/ovarian cancer fall into the lump category of "Health care;" Of course males wouldn't/would be less likely to get those illnesses. But then again, women wouldn't/are less likely to get testicular/prostate cancer. Both sets of illnesses are lumped into the right for health care, which every human should have. But abortion isn't included in either set, as, in most cases, it is not necessary for the continuing health.

(I'm not actually certain that prostate cancer is male only, but wikipedia is lagging so I wasn't able to check. Sorry if I'm mistaken. I'm sure there are other male-only/male-more-likely diseases.)

I.Am
Captain

Quotable Tycoon

7,825 Points
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
  • Signature Look 250
  • Forum Regular 100

Decrepit Faith
Crew

6,100 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Tycoon 200
  • Generous 100
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:20 pm


Mcphee
I mean, sure, niceties are one thing, but it can sometimes get to the point where we're just being doormats.

When I read that I totally thought you said "we're just being democrats." and I was all "Whaaaa?"
Reply
The Pro-life Guild

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum