Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply The Coven
Ivy's weekly questions! New Question 3!! Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

S. Shark

PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 2:54 pm


Galdrea
i don't think it's ever good to maliciously kill someone, but in some cases, a person's death is neccessary. remember Terry Pratchett? that woman lived in limbo for so many years. it was unfair to keep her alive. there are many people who live in limbo like that, and it's unfair to make them live through that pain, with little to no hope of coming back. but it's considered murder to put those poor souls out of their misery. i think it's justified, then.
Er... you mean... Terry Schiavo...? sweatdrop Terry Pratchett ain't dead yet.
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 5:17 am


OKIES, so here goes: I am a pacifist. I am also a consciencous objector (even if i can't spell it...) this means that i find it physically impossible to kill others. This is partly due to my belief that regardless of your RELIGION!, age, sex, view points, race, sexual orientation, etc etc. you are still human, and so i will see in you something in common with me, therefore making it impossible for me to kill you... also in just about every religion to date one of the commandments/basic principles is something along the lines of "THOU SHALT NOT KILL!" (as the christians so bluntly put it...)i take that seriously...in the Schaivo case, it's rather difficult, because she was gaining nothing from life, and i feel that a)if her parents can pay her medical bills she should be able to stay alive (although personally i think they were just hurting themselves) but b)she gained nothing from living and so i would def. want to be released thereby releasing my loved ones from the torment of seeing me like that...i think people should have something like organ donation that says "if i ever end up in a persistent vegetative state for more than 10 years and there's no hope of recovery please do ______________(in my case take away life support)" yeah so then the whole wiccan rede bit, of course it's saying don't bloody kill!!! i dunno it's really hard to explain everything in a short amount of time, but basically KILLING = BAD!! (in like every religion....) and NONVIOLENCE= GOOD!!! so yeah, that's my theory...but i will fight to protect your right to say your opinion, even if it's different than mine... xd

Electric Kool-Aid


PFDiva

PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 3:20 pm


sybex Shark
Galdrea
i don't think it's ever good to maliciously kill someone, but in some cases, a person's death is neccessary. remember Terry Pratchett? that woman lived in limbo for so many years. it was unfair to keep her alive. there are many people who live in limbo like that, and it's unfair to make them live through that pain, with little to no hope of coming back. but it's considered murder to put those poor souls out of their misery. i think it's justified, then.
Er... you mean... Terry Schiavo...? sweatdrop Terry Pratchett ain't dead yet.
sweatdrop sweatdrop sweatdrop sweatdrop sweatdrop oops....My bad. I keep doing that, too! stressed
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:36 pm


I like your arguments... have of you ever heard the interpretation of the wiccan rede that says 'and do what ye well but harm none, but if harm ye must then harm the least' do you think this is how the rede was supposed to read because it is imposible to do no harm? Also how do you feel about humans being the judge of someones acts? When so many of the crimes we have today are based on morals. How could one person judge and other person with out being baist. And example of this is steeling... in many old societies there was no such thing as steeling. Do you believe it is far then to judge that person based on modern day laws?

Ivy_tsuki


Black_the(last)dogstar

PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 6:08 pm


Ivy_tsuki
I like your arguments... have of you ever heard the interpretation of the wiccan rede that says 'and do what ye well but harm none, but if harm ye must then harm the least' do you think this is how the rede was supposed to read because it is imposible to do no harm? Also how do you feel about humans being the judge of someones acts? When so many of the crimes we have today are based on morals. How could one person judge and other person with out being baist. And example of this is steeling... in many old societies there was no such thing as steeling. Do you believe it is far then to judge that person based on modern day laws?


I deffinitly do not think it is right to put someone to death for stealing I mean, since when are objects more important than human life? But I still don't think taking things from other people is right.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:22 pm


Ivy_tsuki
First Question:
How do you all feel about the fact santeria religions, voodoo, vampirism, and satanism are all considered to be under the unbrella of being pagan?

Second Question:
Is it ever alright to kill a person and if you are wiccan do you think that killing a person in self defense is wrong because of the wiccan rede?


A1:I feel that, even though those religions are "evil," that they are still pagan because they are not Catholic, Christian, Jewish, or Islamic. I know that may not be the best definition, but it's simple and it's basicly true. It doesn't bother me because when I say Pagan, they aren't the first to come to mind anyway so it's not like it effects me (I usaully say I'm pagan, not Wiccan...simply because..meh well, that's just how I feel >P)

A2: I believe that killing or maiming someone in self-defense is not wrong just because someone is Wiccan or just Pagan. Actaully, /because/ someone is Wiccan and defending themselves I believe it is perfectly right. I believe this because it's not going against the Wiccan rede, in my opinion. Just because you can't hurt someone else doesn't mean you can let yourself get hurt. I believe the divine will see the situation clearly. I also think that because someone is Wiccan, as opposed to Muslim, is because a Wiccan is sticking to their integrity.


biggrin

Something to Replace


Wrath of Ezekiel

5,350 Points
  • Beta Contributor 0
  • Beta Citizen 0
  • Beta Forum Regular 0
PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 12:20 pm


A1: Well, paganism in most books is considered an umbrella term, just like Chritianity is an umbrella term for Catholism, Mormonism, etc. That's what I consider....

A2: It's never right to kill a person, unless the person wants to be killed (euthansia/assisited suicide) because their life wouldn't be important. That's why I think the death penalty is just wrong.

Killing a person in self-defense requires some thought. If you could've just knocked that person uncounsicous, you should've done that.
PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:09 pm


A1: Perhaps it's just where I live, but when I say I'm Pagan, people just generally look confused (and, as it turns out, most have no idea of the neopagan movement...and Wicca is considered completely different from Paganism to most. Go figure). I've had loads of people Ask if I'm a Satanist, but most think that this is (rightly) different from the term Pagan. Vampirism, too, is not an issue, really...almost constantly balmy weather sort of deters the vamp sort...

I typically tend not to dwell on it, really, as it really is a live-and-let-live thing. As said before, Pagan is a pretty umbrellaish term, and if someone thinks something false of me, I'll just correct them, and no harm done.

A2: First of all, let me say that I'm pro-choice, just so we can get that out of the way. A child unloved and unwanted (etc.) is a much sadder thing than a child given another chance in a better life. Secondly, let me say that I consider myself Pagan, but not Wiccan, generally. I think brutal murder is insanely wrong. A person in at least decent health should not have to die by another's hand. I also think that it is a crueler fate to live out your life behind bars than it is to be put to sleep. The human mind is perhaps the worst hell of all. And if the person in mind is a "vegetable", then I think it is really the family's job to let go. Putting a person "out of their misery" is not as horrid as people tend to think. I'm against killing, I am, but I don't see the point in suffering when it is not necessary.

...I think that's a long enough ramble for now... wink

LacquerMuse


Starlock

PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 11:41 am


A1: I don't consider either vampirism or satanism to be under the umbrella of Neopaganism. They are not earth-based religions, nor are they polytheistic/pantheistic/animistic or reconstructions of old Pagan religions. There could be vampires and satanists who supplement their beliefs with those that can fall under Neopaganism, but in themselves they aren't. I don't know enough about Santeria and VooDoo to place them. From what I know, Santeria is definately Neopagan, as it is a reconstruction of African tribal beliefs. And there are so many misconceptions about VooDoo, I'm not going to touch that without doing research. sweatdrop

A2: No, it's never all right to kill anything, but it's the way things are. To live, things must die. It's simply how things are. Every day we kill. The food you eat was once alive. It is now dead. It's part of the life cycle. Now, if you're not killing someone for a legitimate reason, yes, there's something a bit morally wrong with that. Ideally you should strive for minimal harm, but we all know harming *none* in the absolute sense is impossible... even in death.
Reply
The Coven

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum