|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 8:34 am
DevilsLight Noxious Weed THROWS HANDS IN THE AIR MICHEAL BAY DID NOT MAKE IT OFFICIAL. Now that I have a little bit of information right as the movie is coming out i can stick it to you all that Micheal Bay is not to blame here.(sorry I'm excited because I'm right) PARAMOUNT basically said, "2011 or you ain't getting s**t Micheal Bay." This information can be found on his website somewhereabouts I'll fetch a link here in a few. And now Micheal Bay has to either GIVE UP EVERY OTHER MOVIE HE'S WORKING ON, or make a Transformers similar to Transformers 2. I personally, am not expecting any robots to be in it.Therefore I will be pleasantly surprised when I watch the movie. I will be happy everytime I see a screenshot of Ratchet,. Raaatchet. ALSO POO MEAGAN FOX, I WISH BAY WOULD GET HIS WAY, but I hope they prank her lots. Great... so this means Bay will make an even crappier movie since he's not going to even try. Then again maybe because he's not trying so hard it turns out to be a decent movie as oppose to the others smile It would be a serious irony if his movie turns out to be the best of the 3 and he put zero effort because he didn't want to do it. i dont know when he trys his movies are kinda crapy maybe if he dozint try it will be better... s**t that shounds hopeful... dam you BAY!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:45 pm
Bay is being threatened.
XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:26 pm
Why do all movie series have to come in 3s these days? Not that I'm complaining, another TF movie is fine with me even if it is a Bay movie. But really now, why 3?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 11:16 pm
Pumkinn Why do all movie series have to come in 3s these days? Not that I'm complaining, another TF movie is fine with me even if it is a Bay movie. But really now, why 3? Spiderman has a 4th coming... so your theory is a little off ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 5:37 pm
Anything with a large enough profit margin gets a sequel. This includes sequels as well . . . for every person with any credentials in reviewing movies said this movie was a worthless pile. Many non-accredited individuals disliked the film as well. Still, it made money by the Long Haul truckload, so the demand has spoken. A sequel is in the works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:00 pm
BogiePop Great... so this means Bay will make an even crappier movie since he's not going to even try. Then again maybe because he's not trying so hard it turns out to be a decent movie as oppose to the others smile It would be a serious irony if his movie turns out to be the best of the 3 and he put zero effort because he didn't want to do it. The Special features in the two-disc edition, it explains a lot.This time however, Bay is dropping all other ones to work on Transformers, not like last time. They also have a new writer, so I have a slight hope that the third one will be good. LOTR's started the whole Trilogy thing. Because it was so successful people ignored that it was three books and just started doing the whole Trilogy thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:52 am
Yamato1 Steal_this_username I'm excited, but not surprised... there's a lot of money to be made in the live action movie franchise, despite how crappy the movies may or may not be. I can't see them getting rid of Megan Fox, simply because she's too hot to just toss away. Some people see the Transformers movies just to see her, so props to her. I guess. She may be a real pain, but they need her. Someone has to play the tits and legs part of the movie, though I do like her character personality wise. In this case, I think "hotness" is in the Eye of the Beholder. And 2 things. One, I can think of several people who could have fit the role of the heroine better than that sun-bleached bimbo. and Two, when the hell did Transformers become all about the tits and legs? I thought it was about a war, and giant robots, and giant robots, and oh yeah, Giant robots FIGHTING giant robots. >.> Where did they go astray? Oh right.. Michael Bay. >.> Indeed! I'm sure that there are plenty of people out there that would see the movie for the giant robot battles alone. I know I would! 4laugh Really, though, I wish Megan Fox would go away. They're dropping Elizabeth and Will for the next Pirates of the Carribean movie (they are now living a cozy sea-shore life), and since Sam technically followed his fate of saving Optimus Prime the main human characters could be dropped too! Here's to hoping the robots that the movie is named after actually get lines besides Optimus, Megatron, Bumblebee, and Starscream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 3:47 pm
I have heard at least 4 things about the 3rd TF movie. 1. the fallen is comming back (his voice actor is going to b the guy that plays Phillip Banks from Fresh Prince [i can't think of the actors name right off hand]) 2. it is going to b in 3-D 3. there is going to b less sound (idk how that is going to work out with the giant fighting robots and all) and 4. some of the cities that they r going to probably shoot in r Chicago, Washington D.C, and Seattle
that is all i got so far from TFW2005.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:39 pm
I have a question:
If Micheal Bay wasn't directing these movies, who would be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:09 am
Pumkinn I have a question:
If Micheal Bay wasn't directing these movies, who would be? the guy who did zombieland that movie was awsome and well made or hell peter jackson i'll settle for ron howard just to get bay away from my transformers you know hes doing the remake of nightmare on elm street that s**t looks stupid stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:17 pm
toria94 ...on July 1st, 2011!
Michael Bay's made it official. TF3 comes out in 2011, not 2012 like he first said. mrgreen Whoever's excited, raise your hand! *throws arms into sky and happily flails* And for those of you who aren't fans of Megan Fox [like me]... Bad news. She's back for TF3.
More details can be found on the TFLive Blogspot or on MBay's website. Just so ya know. i know because i worked on the story for the third movie! i kinda helped and they said that i won't be in the movie but i may have front seat for the voice of Megatron!!! ...they said i may be voice of Megatron not that i will! sad ...i hope i get it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 12:04 pm
I'm upset, I have yet to see my favorite autobot crying , and by the looks of it Ill never see him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:51 pm
Ok...am I the only one who thinks Dark of the Moon looks really...really...really stupid? In a rather crackish way? And perhaps slightly offensive...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:44 am
Eh, the moon bits look better than that one sci-fi thriller that came out recently that was supposed to take place on the moon. In that one, there wasn't even a nominal attempt to make it look like the people were moving in a low-gravity environment. I can suspend my disbelief as well as the next guy, but when you're shooting a film that takes place on the moon but make ZERO effort to try to get the motion of a body in low-G, it's just insulting to my intelligence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:46 am
Noxious Weed LOTR's started the whole Trilogy thing. Because it was so successful people ignored that it was three books and just started doing the whole Trilogy thing. The trilogy epidemic started way before LOTR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
