|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 2:23 pm
Bigfoot I don't believe in. If we have yet to even find it's remains when there's people who dedicate their lives to looking for it, these are very intelligent creatures or nonexistant.
Nessie...eh. I'm afraid of big bodies of water because I can't be sure what's in them. When it comes to a water creature...I think I'll swim in a pool instead.
Vaja: I had nightmares of megalodon as a kid. emo
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:28 pm
Shiori Miko Vaja: I had nightmares of megalodon as a kid. emo >.> I use to have nightmares of great whites (practically the condensed offspring of megalodons) as a kid but it was pretty sound since I bogey boarded a lot in the pacific ocean. Giant angry sharks are scary emo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:53 pm
Vajapocalypse Shiori Miko Vaja: I had nightmares of megalodon as a kid. emo >.> I use to have nightmares of great whites (practically the condensed offspring of megalodons) as a kid but it was pretty sound since I bogey boarded a lot in the pacific ocean. Giant angry sharks are scary emo psh, giant angry sharks are timid xp and are now only cl 7.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:07 am
Megalodon's are super scary :CCCC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:26 am
CH0Z0 Vajapocalypse Shiori Miko Vaja: I had nightmares of megalodon as a kid. emo >.> I use to have nightmares of great whites (practically the condensed offspring of megalodons) as a kid but it was pretty sound since I bogey boarded a lot in the pacific ocean. Giant angry sharks are scary emo psh, giant angry sharks are timid xp and are now only cl 7.5 Only on land. The wons in the sea are still horrifying burning_eyes @Ashno: Yes, yes they are until you see the scifi original Megalodon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:12 pm
Vajapocalypse CH0Z0 Vajapocalypse Shiori Miko Vaja: I had nightmares of megalodon as a kid. emo >.> I use to have nightmares of great whites (practically the condensed offspring of megalodons) as a kid but it was pretty sound since I bogey boarded a lot in the pacific ocean. Giant angry sharks are scary emo psh, giant angry sharks are timid xp and are now only cl 7.5 Only on land. The wons in the sea are still horrifying burning_eyes @Ashno: Yes, yes they are until you see the scifi original Megalodon Actually I did one of those shark seeing tourists things with my father about a year ago? or something. And it was absolutely amazing. I'd still rather not get involved with sharks though. And I'll youtube it right away :u
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:43 pm
People believe what they see, and see what they want to see.
It's all in your minds. mrgreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:26 pm
Ashno Vajapocalypse CH0Z0 Vajapocalypse Shiori Miko Vaja: I had nightmares of megalodon as a kid. emo >.> I use to have nightmares of great whites (practically the condensed offspring of megalodons) as a kid but it was pretty sound since I bogey boarded a lot in the pacific ocean. Giant angry sharks are scary emo psh, giant angry sharks are timid xp and are now only cl 7.5 Only on land. The wons in the sea are still horrifying burning_eyes @Ashno: Yes, yes they are until you see the scifi original Megalodon Actually I did one of those shark seeing tourists things with my father about a year ago? or something. And it was absolutely amazing. I'd still rather not get involved with sharks though. And I'll youtube it right away :u That's pretty cool o3o I love sharks but just don't want to swim with them... or be any where near them for that matter. I was watching the discovery channel last year and they had the documentary about these people swimming with great whites D: and they were surprised when one was aggressive. I was like well what did you people expect? Oh and the best video ever (haven't been able to find it on youtube)! The guy who was surfing and two great whites went for him o3o; both missed but it's a crazy video because of the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:08 pm
Vajapocalypse I think it's possible for these creatures to be out there. Just look at the panda. That animal was thought to be a mythical creature for centuries.   Wow, I never knew that! ^w^
I believe that they're out there, in one form or another
Take my neighbor for example
He's so hairy, you can call him Big Foot legitimately!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:12 am
nessie is a made up folk tale to attract tourists.
and it still works today. ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:46 pm
Well, I'm a believer. Most of the time. I think it's very possible that theirs thousands, maybe even millions of species deep in the jungles or in the darkest depths of the ocean that we have yet to even come close to discovering. I can't see why the odds are slim that something might be in the waters of Loch Ness. Do we know everything? Absolutely not. Are we even close to knowing half of everything? Definitely not. xd I'm a firm believer that nothing can truly be nonexistent. Not until we have every speck of dirt on the earth mapped and charted for, at least.
We're probably not even close to discovering all the species of sharks. There's probably megalodons lurking out there right now wink For all we know, there's no proven reason why they can't be there. Why can't there be a Landshark? xD If you can tell me a logical reason I'll be very impressed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:19 pm
Well, Nessie is a proven hoax...so I don't believe Nessie exsists, plus they scanned the entire Loch Ness with radar by having a line of boats go across the whole thing at once so nothing could get passed them.
I don't believe in any of the other Lake Monster's either. There's many good explanations for the sightings (birds, logs, waves), and I've personally seen things where at first it does look like there's a monster in a lake, but it always turned out to be something else (I have seen very tricky waves).
Mothman's probably just people mistaking owls for strange creatures.
The Chupacabra is really just canines with mange (it's a skin disease that makes them look really freaky). Some supposed dead Chupacabras have been DNA tested and proved to be dogs and coyotes.
Rods....do not exist, they're just an optical illusion caused by bugs passing quickly by a typical camera.
Bigfoot is one I do believe might exist. It is possible that all the footprints have been hoaxes, but if they are there are hoaxers out there that know they're primate anatomy pretty darn well (since there have been footprints that display dermal ridges and scar tissue).
...yeah...I watch too much Monster Quest
sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:17 am
Aneyana Well, Nessie is a proven hoax...so I don't believe Nessie exsists, plus they scanned the entire Loch Ness with radar by having a line of boats go across the whole thing at once so nothing could get passed them. I don't believe in any of the other Lake Monster's either. There's many good explanations for the sightings (birds, logs, waves), and I've personally seen things where at first it does look like there's a monster in a lake, but it always turned out to be something else (I have seen very tricky waves). Mothman's probably just people mistaking owls for strange creatures. The Chupacabra is really just canines with mange (it's a skin disease that makes them look really freaky). Some supposed dead Chupacabras have been DNA tested and proved to be dogs and coyotes. Rods....do not exist, they're just an optical illusion caused by bugs passing quickly by a typical camera. Bigfoot is one I do believe might exist. It is possible that all the footprints have been hoaxes, but if they are there are hoaxers out there that know they're primate anatomy pretty darn well (since there have been footprints that display dermal ridges and scar tissue). ...yeah...I watch too much Monster Quest sweatdrop Science can't explain everything talk2hand Vaja- There was this one time where tourists were in a cage, and a shark attacked the cage and made a big gap in the cage and got it.. It then got stuck inside while the divers swam out of it as fast as they could.. xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:39 am
Aneyana Well, Nessie is a proven hoax...so I don't believe Nessie exsists, plus they scanned the entire Loch Ness with radar by having a line of boats go across the whole thing at once so nothing could get passed them. I don't believe in any of the other Lake Monster's either. There's many good explanations for the sightings (birds, logs, waves), and I've personally seen things where at first it does look like there's a monster in a lake, but it always turned out to be something else (I have seen very tricky waves). Mothman's probably just people mistaking owls for strange creatures. The Chupacabra is really just canines with mange (it's a skin disease that makes them look really freaky). Some supposed dead Chupacabras have been DNA tested and proved to be dogs and coyotes. Rods....do not exist, they're just an optical illusion caused by bugs passing quickly by a typical camera. Bigfoot is one I do believe might exist. It is possible that all the footprints have been hoaxes, but if they are there are hoaxers out there that know they're primate anatomy pretty darn well (since there have been footprints that display dermal ridges and scar tissue). ...yeah...I watch too much Monster Quest sweatdrop 
I strongly disagree with you. xD Supposedly there's tons of twisting and turning underwater cave's down there beyond radar's reach. I think a lake monster is more probable than a mutant ape. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:13 pm
Aneyana Well, Nessie is a proven hoax...so I don't believe Nessie exsists, plus they scanned the entire Loch Ness with radar by having a line of boats go across the whole thing at once so nothing could get passed them. I don't believe in any of the other Lake Monster's either. There's many good explanations for the sightings (birds, logs, waves), and I've personally seen things where at first it does look like there's a monster in a lake, but it always turned out to be something else (I have seen very tricky waves). Mothman's probably just people mistaking owls for strange creatures. The Chupacabra is really just canines with mange (it's a skin disease that makes them look really freaky). Some supposed dead Chupacabras have been DNA tested and proved to be dogs and coyotes. Rods....do not exist, they're just an optical illusion caused by bugs passing quickly by a typical camera. Bigfoot is one I do believe might exist. It is possible that all the footprints have been hoaxes, but if they are there are hoaxers out there that know they're primate anatomy pretty darn well (since there have been footprints that display dermal ridges and scar tissue). ...yeah...I watch too much Monster Quest sweatdrop I've watched monster quest a lot too. Creatures like Nessy could still exist but have just migrated to different areas. Why would a sea monster stay in an area too small unless for breeding? Also, we assume Nessy breathes air which may not be the case. Could be like bull sharks (I think that's the shark) that can transfer from salt to fresh water. Chuppie (they chupacabre) could also exist. Unless you test everything there is still a bit of doubt. Also, not all dogs with mange look like what has been cited. Never got into the mothman *couldn't even watch the movie talk2hand * Big foot... it's possible but I think that'd be the least likely out of any of them. They're huge and live on land. Not the makings of keeping hidden. @Ashno: XD I've seen the video of that. Did you see the one with the guy talking about how sweet and docile sharks are and then gets attacked? Also the one where the guy kept making out with nurse sharks and got bit in the face (both people survived).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
