|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:13 pm
No, no. It isn't a fault of anyone's, especially anyone here. I'm not going to frame the incident and hang it up on the wall, though.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:21 pm
A girl lost in the depths of her own confusion, she last cried out... "I guess this is the issue with having literate people all captured in one guild. Because we tend to have stronger opinions than n00bs do, and a lot of the time people with opinions cause conflict.
Ah yes, the curse of literacy/intelligence. xd " And there she remained. Forever forgotten.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:23 pm
Wouldn't you think that more literate people are more mature about their opinions, than say a flaming troll-n00b?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:26 pm
A girl lost in the depths of her own confusion, she last cried out... "Not always. Just look at politicians. And the ED forum. talk2hand " And there she remained. Forever forgotten.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:45 pm
What I find hilarious is that politics are used by "preppy cheerleaders and jocks" or, in other words, people who are not very smart as a pathetic attempt to make conversation.
Heidi: Omg, Tiffany! Like, what are you, like, doing, like, right now, gal pal?
Sarah: I'm, like, reading about politics!
Heidi: Omg, I, like, TOTALLY think that, like, Obama should become president!
Sarah: Omfg really? I think that, like, McCain would be better. Why do you, like, think Obama should be, like, president?
Heidi: Because... because... His, uhh... goals are so, like, cool, and, uhh... like, he wants to help the poor people!
Sarah: Ttly kewl, bff!
Heidi: Why do you, like, think that, like, McCain should be president?
Sarah: Because his son is SUCH a hottie!!! *fangirl scream*
...And you can tell where it goes from there. Just so you know, this was based off of an actual overheard conversation between two girls at my school.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:48 pm
((Why did Heidi call Sarah Tiffany? xd ))
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:57 pm
Oops. I'm used to OOC parentheses. rofl
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:20 pm
emo I have a gal-pal.. We talk about Feudalism, and Democracy. On occasion. It isn't like that okay?!
AND-
CURSES ON THE ILLITERATE.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:25 am
We should be allowed to have heated, strong opioned conversations and not be halted because of a dislike of possible Flaming. We're so smart it'll just be heated smartness and a fun discussion, just as long as we remember to still wuv each other at the end. xD
To me this idea is not at all "new" or "the future". I saw movie on it yesterday too. It's commonplace in America for infertile women to pay another woman to have their baby.
Smart kitty powers ftw.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:41 pm
@Hiddochi: You'd be surprised at how opinionated n00bs can be. Here's a fun game - Go find a chatspeaker about thirteen years old. Then find a 'discussion' topic about...Orlando Bloom. Or Twilight. Or something else dear to the heart of young teenagers that you happen to dislike. When you know your chosen chatspeaker will see the topic, express your dislike politely and maturely. Back it up with reasoned and well-thought-out arguments.
Nine times out of ten, you will get three results. One: You will not change their mind as to the wonder-awesome-specialness of the topic in question. Two: You will be accused of being stupid, jealous, a b***h, a liar, or not having 'interpreted' the topic correctly. Three: They will never, ever let it go. Three years later, you will still have emails in your inbox accusing you of being a 'hater'.
...I sound bitter? What? That is crazy talk.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:39 pm
*thinks really hard*
...I don't get it. confused
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:20 pm
I believe SilentShadowDreamer's statement o-o I've met with two 14 year olds on two separate occasions and goddamn were they rude. They really hit it off when I told them that xD hah..
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:37 pm
N-Kun13 To me this idea is not at all "new" or "the future". I saw movie on it yesterday too. It's commonplace in America for infertile women to pay another woman to have their baby. No, This is different than just being a surrogate mother.
It's as if a woman took stem cells from herself, and pretty much created a genetic copy of herself- to some extent. She carries her own child. A surrogate mother = not the same thing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|