|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:23 pm
Drake Grayson Lemur9 I think you can write about killing God without saying people should want to kill God, just like you can write about God without saying that people should worship him. Nobody gets upset when writers mention God in their books, but as soon as someone incorporates killing God into a story, everyone gets all upset and goes "Oh, don't read that!" The US has an Amendment saying that everyone has the freedom of religion, but we make kids say "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance in school every day and we don't want them to read books that don't support God (like how some people are all upset about Harry Potter and "witchcraft" in it). The Golden Compass trilogy is awesome, and you shouldn't let some concern about problems with religion keep you from reading it or seeing it! In case you hadn't guessed, I'm an atheist. heart You’re an atheist, which means you don’t believe in anything. Who cares what you think? The only way you would understand what this girl is saying is if you had beliefs (which you don’t, since you’re an atheist). So your opinion pretty much means nothing in this debate.This is opening a whole new can of worms that this debate is NOT about.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:26 pm
Triska Drake Grayson Lemur9 I think you can write about killing God without saying people should want to kill God, just like you can write about God without saying that people should worship him. Nobody gets upset when writers mention God in their books, but as soon as someone incorporates killing God into a story, everyone gets all upset and goes "Oh, don't read that!" The US has an Amendment saying that everyone has the freedom of religion, but we make kids say "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance in school every day and we don't want them to read books that don't support God (like how some people are all upset about Harry Potter and "witchcraft" in it). The Golden Compass trilogy is awesome, and you shouldn't let some concern about problems with religion keep you from reading it or seeing it! In case you hadn't guessed, I'm an atheist. heart You’re an atheist, which means you don’t believe in anything. Who cares what you think? The only way you would understand what this girl is saying is if you had beliefs (which you don’t, since you’re an atheist). So your opinion pretty much means nothing in this debate.This is opening a whole new can of worms that this debate is NOT about. I know but I just had to get that out. >_> Got attacked alot today and I finally cracked.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:33 pm
Well, this is not an attack on a group. Just a man. So please bare that in mind.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:11 pm
Morgey I'm of the opinion that if someone allows a fictional novel to dash their faith, then it wasn't very strong to begin with. Otherwise, you can't expect to have the right to air your beliefs if you refuse others the rights to air theirs. =|
And doesn't shielding yourself from criticism of your faith just suggests that you're not that secure about it? Otherwise, wouldn't you be able to face it anyway, and still come out confident?
I don't know much about this specific book/ set of books, but there's my two pence anyway. Anyway, I'm definitely going to buy the trilogy after all the commotion it has created. The reason that I'm against the books is because my faith is strong. I know it's all fiction, but the themes in it certainly don't seem that way. I have a strong grip on my faith, but my little sister (as well as so many other people of all ages) won't have that firm foothold.
And before I am attacked because I clearly hate the books, I'll let you know that I own them. They were given to me as a Christmas gift by a relative. I've read them all, and I'll even try and point out passages that clearly show what we've all be talking about.
By the way, I'm also one of those crazy Harry Potter fanatics. There's no way anyone who knows me can say otherwise. I can read literature that supports evolution and atheism and whatever else; heck, that's half of my science fiction books/movies. But when it clearly goes all-out against my religion, rather than just staying within its own, that's when I get all defensive. Because I'm going to have a problem with something that makes such a big impression on the malleable minds of youth.
The movies tone down the religious themes and everything else that is so offensive, and the supposed 'theme' will appeal to little kids. Oh look, a talking polar bear. And the main character is a little girl with a talking cat. (Okay, the 'cat' changes shape, but you get my point.) One look at most children's shows today will tell you that most kids like watching shows that depict children as the smart/fun/cool people who make the adults look silly. Either way, older kids want to read the books because the movie was so cool. (It happened with the new Narnia movie, with Lord of the Rings [to an extent], and various other adaptations to the big screen.) In support of my statement. The Golden Compass is anti-Christian/anti-religion
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:15 pm
Quote: First, there is nothing wrong with feeling angry with God (the Bible is filled with such examples -David, Job, etc.) nor is reading a book about someone angry with God "sinful". However, Moby d**k is a book with symbolism of a man defying God (just as Jonah did in the Bible). So that argument is pointless. Except to agree that some of our greatest literature questions organized religion, the Bible, in fact, is one example and Jesus had much to criticize.
Secondly, I am much less concerned with my own children’s’ ties to God being severed than I am with those that have yet to learn about Him. If the first introduction to “God” a child has is through a twisted lens that equates God with a warped religious tyranny, it certainly limits the option of “free thinking” as some suggest. Furthermore, to believe that all parents are raising their children “to reason and (be) taught to recognize propaganda and false doctrines.” is a misguided assumption. Source: from a comment on here
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:43 am
Morgey I'm of the opinion that if someone allows a fictional novel to dash their faith, then it wasn't very strong to begin with. Otherwise, you can't expect to have the right to air your beliefs if you refuse others the rights to air theirs. =|
And doesn't shielding yourself from criticism of your faith just suggests that you're not that secure about it? Otherwise, wouldn't you be able to face it anyway, and still come out confident?
I don't know much about this specific book/ set of books, but there's my two pence anyway. Anyway, I'm definitely going to buy the trilogy after all the commotion it has created. Brava.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:49 am
Triska If you read my thing, you would notice that not once did I say the words "Atheist." Reason; I don't believe he is one. I believe he is a Son of Perdition. And there is a difference between them. How do I get that? Well, you can't say that you want to incurage kids to kill God when you don't believe there's a God to begin with. Oh, just so you know. I LOVE Harry Potter. I'm not one of those weirdos that that believe that Harry Potter incurages "Witchcraft." (Look at my sig.) And, not supporting God I have found includes supporting God. When I went to school there was a rule to not pray. The "Under God" seemed to me to be the ONLY time I have heard any support for God. In fact, I've heard a lot of nonsupport. People seem to have forgotten that. Out of curiousity...have you read them? I'm not going to argue this point, as I haven't read the books yet, but it seems to me, if you haven't read them, to base your dislike of the books on something you heard seems a bit silly. On a side note, I'd like to mention that I'm happy that there is this type of book out there, if it is, actually, anti-Christian. I'm not a Christian, and I have nothing against them, but there are so many books out there that DO have hidden!Christianity *cough The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe cough*, that I think it's about time that the youth gets a touch of something else. Oh. And. What does this have to do with Doctor Who?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 11:51 am
Drake Grayson Triska Drake Grayson Lemur9 I think you can write about killing God without saying people should want to kill God, just like you can write about God without saying that people should worship him. Nobody gets upset when writers mention God in their books, but as soon as someone incorporates killing God into a story, everyone gets all upset and goes "Oh, don't read that!" The US has an Amendment saying that everyone has the freedom of religion, but we make kids say "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance in school every day and we don't want them to read books that don't support God (like how some people are all upset about Harry Potter and "witchcraft" in it). The Golden Compass trilogy is awesome, and you shouldn't let some concern about problems with religion keep you from reading it or seeing it! In case you hadn't guessed, I'm an atheist. heart You’re an atheist, which means you don’t believe in anything. Who cares what you think? The only way you would understand what this girl is saying is if you had beliefs (which you don’t, since you’re an atheist). So your opinion pretty much means nothing in this debate.This is opening a whole new can of worms that this debate is NOT about. I know but I just had to get that out. >_> Got attacked alot today and I finally cracked.Hate to quibble on semantics, but um... Being atheist does not mean that you don't believe in anything. In fact, quite the opposite. It means you have a strong belief that there is no divine power. So, yes, they do in fact understand what it is to have a strong faith and what it can mean to have it challenged. So saying to them "you don't believe there is a god, you don't believe in anything, so you can't possibly understand" is tantamount to them saying to you "you believe in god and that he has power over everything, so really what you say and do doesn't even matter." The fact of the matter is that Atheism is a religion and even if you yourself don't believe in it, you should at least respect its views enough to understand them, if you're going to argue against them. But, back to the main issue... It rather concerns me that The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe was lauded as a good film because it promoted Christian beliefs, yet a movie which promotes other beliefs is automatically bad. For one thing, they're both fiction. To quote Lesie Fish in one of her songs "gotta wonder 'bout these people and what they say and feel, they can't tell a game from real life, they think this stuff is real." The fact of the matter is that young kids aren't going to get it. I read The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe when I was eight and the symbolism went right over my head. It's only as an adult that I wondered how anyone could have missed it. It's never kids who are insulted that their beliefs are being challenged because to them, it doesn't challenge them. To them, this is just a fun story that's being told. Beliefs have nothing to do with it. Which is why I always think it's funny that people feel the need to condemn films for such reasons. If you're old enough to get the symbolism, you're old enough to be strong in your faith. If you're not old enough to get the symbolism, it probably won't even occur to you to think about it. It's the hullabaloo that makes kids wonder what's going on and explore the issue. Berz.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:51 pm
Raevyn_Angel Out of curiousity...have you read them? No, but if you look further you would see that Ceribri has, and has made a statement on it. And I know it has nothing to do with Dr. Who. The problem is that there is no side foram in this guild for off topic things. If I wanted to say something on this, it had to be here. Berzerker: The argument is well made on Atheist. And I wish for this antics of views on this to end right now. As it is, as I have been having to repeat over and over again. I do not believe him to be a real atheist. Evil tends to hide in the guise of religion. In ANY religion. The evidence I have is him saying that he wishes to incurage kids to kill God. You can't make that kind of statement if you do not believe he's there to begin with.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:56 pm
*Sigh* Okay, prepare yourself, big rant coming on.
Number one, he does not want to kill God. One of his characters believes that by destroying the divinity he can give all creatures free will, which is, in my book, noble sentiment.
But this does not inherently mean Pullman himself wants to kill God. In fact, in the one scene where he describes God, the creature is described very intently, very carefully. Almost lovingly. The creature known as the divinity then is dispersed, his atoms spread through time and space.
Pullman wants people to think for themselves, or that is how I see it. He wants us to use our free will, and not blindly follow a religion just because we were born into it and people want us to. Saying that Pullman wants to kill god is like saying that J.K Rowling wanted people to practice witchcraft.
The bottom of it is; that this is entertainment. It may not even mean anything at all. We have to take it at face value, for sometimes, there isn’t any hidden meaning, at all, and we are projecting our own feelings onto the media.
And have any of these people who believe Pullman wants to “kill god” even read the series? Perhaps instead of making blind accusations you should try the books first, instead of jumping to conclusions. Everything can be “anti-Christian” if you look hard enough.
And if you are really Christian, you beleive God is omnipiant, and immortal, therefore he cannot be "killed".
I am looking forward to watching this movie, because I absolutely loved the novels.
End Rant. biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:59 pm
Raevyn_Angel Morgey I'm of the opinion that if someone allows a fictional novel to dash their faith, then it wasn't very strong to begin with. Otherwise, you can't expect to have the right to air your beliefs if you refuse others the rights to air theirs. =|
And doesn't shielding yourself from criticism of your faith just suggests that you're not that secure about it? Otherwise, wouldn't you be able to face it anyway, and still come out confident? Brava.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:30 pm
My life was never full of doing the things I do not wish to do. I go where I wish. Do as I wish. On the things that I know are to be right. This is free will. The ability to do as we wish. While churches scorns against wickedness, you may be thinking they are placing rules to control it's people. The truth is on all the experiences I've heard about where the people turned to wickedness, pain was involved. Most of them I've heard first hand. Wickedness never way happiness. The rules are not meant to control. But in truth to guide us to happiness. The Devil wishes to take this power to chose away. To force us in one direction. And in cleaver guile would trick us into believing that it's God that's taking it away.
This is no rant. There is no anger. This is a piece of my testimony to God.
I will admit that I was about to post something else. But I felt within that if I continue to speak in rant. Rant is all I will get back. Instead, I speak to you what I know to be true. And I know, the scriptures to be true.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:22 pm
The issue of free will is an interesting one particularly in most branches of Christianity. For one thing, God is omnipotent and omniscient. He can therefor do anything He wants and knows everything. God chose to give us free will. We are therefor free to choose not to do what He wants us to do. But, if God is omniscient, He would know whether or not we would choose to go against His bidding and would act to prevent us from doing the wicked deed by placing warnings and obstacles in our path. So is that really, then, free will? It's a conundrum that even the most pious of theologists have been plagued by for centuries. Just something to ponder. Quote: The argument is well made on Atheist. And I wish for this antics of views on this to end right now. As it is, as I have been having to repeat over and over again. I do not believe him to be a real atheist. Evil tends to hide in the guise of religion. In ANY religion. The evidence I have is him saying that he wishes to incurage kids to kill God. You can't make that kind of statement if you do not believe he's there to begin with. Fine, but misconceptions about religions other than one's own are part of the reason that the Middle East is such a mess. I attempt to correct them whenever I see them in hopes that it will one day lead to something better. I have no doubt he's not an Atheist. I never claimed he was. Obviously, he has to believe something is there, though it's also obvious to me that it's not the same God that you and I know (who is omnipotent, omniscient, and eternal and cannot be killed). What's ridiculous to me is the idea that because he wrote about killing this fictional god in a fictional universe, it means he wants to kill our God in our universe. They're clearly not the same entity in any way shape or form. Berz.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:40 pm
Triska Raevyn_Angel Out of curiousity...have you read them? No, but if you look further you would see that Ceribri has, and has made a statement on it. And I know it has nothing to do with Dr. Who. The problem is that there is no side foram in this guild for off topic things. If I wanted to say something on this, it had to be here. Good on Ceribri for reading the books before she formed an opinion of them. I thoroughly respect her opinion. However. Your statements are based purely on what others have said, not from actually reading the material. It's equivalent to those who have never read Harry Potter protesting about how it teaches children witchcraft. I'm not a mod or anything, but perhaps this guild doesn't have an off topic forum because it isn't needed. If it were meant for debates about religion in literature, or the lack thereof, it would be called...oh, I don't know..."God's Monthly Read" or sommat.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:18 pm
Triska My life was never full of doing the things I do not wish to do. I go where I wish. Do as I wish. On the things that I know are to be right. This is free will. The ability to do as we wish. While churches scorns against wickedness, you may be thinking they are placing rules to control it's people. The truth is on all the experiences I've heard about where the people turned to wickedness, pain was involved. Most of them I've heard first hand. Wickedness never way happiness. The rules are not meant to control. But in truth to guide us to happiness. The Devil wishes to take this power to chose away. To force us in one direction. And in cleaver guile would trick us into believing that it's God that's taking it away. This is no rant. There is no anger. This is a piece of my testimony to God. I will admit that I was about to post something else. But I felt within that if I continue to speak in rant. Rant is all I will get back. Instead, I speak to you what I know to be true. And I know, the scriptures to be true. No one truly "knows". We beleive. Thats completely different. You could be wrong, hell, I could be completely wrong. No one really knows until we die, and by then it doesn't matter anymore. And yes, this has absolutly nothing to do with Doctor Who, so mayhap you should save the flaming of works of literary merit and the foisting of Christianity for other guilds, lest you start preaching that the Doctor is somehow involved in a plot to force children to stray from "the right path." Good Day.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|