|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:24 pm
I love that gif. heart
***** know Gaia seems to lie a lot now...
They ban "potential botters" and change the market to increase inflation.
They are changing into a pay site soon more items will involve real money than Gaia gold.
And they ban words for "our safety."
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 1:44 pm
+--Great, now more innocent people will be banned. -sighs- What I don't get is that this is a PG-13 site, right? We should be able to curse and use sex terms all we want as long as we don't get into overly descriptive violence or sex. Plus, ***** is a word that can be used in PG movies. Look at Shrek! PG movie, and I could totally see it using the word.--+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 1:55 pm
+--Zi, can I put that pic in my siggy?--+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:16 pm
And mister Pedobear never got his IP adress permanently banned from the site.
Well f*ck this.
Edit: HAH, I can't even say his name without cheating!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:40 pm
I just had this beautiful idea...
What if the GIB AS A WHOLE made a big, public stand against it. Imagine Gaia trying to ban ALL OF US. Do you see the upheaval it would cause? They wouldn't dare remove a name as prestigious as the GIB from Gaia. It would be folly! We have the fame and numbers... I think we could make a difference. Or at least make a point.
What say you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:46 pm
T-demon aka Kuma +--Zi, can I put that pic in my siggy?--+
What picture exactly are we talking about?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:46 pm
Quinn Cillian I just had this beautiful idea...
What if the GIB AS A WHOLE made a big, public stand against it. Imagine Gaia trying to ban ALL OF US. Do you see the upheaval it would cause? They wouldn't dare remove a name as prestigious as the GIB from Gaia. It would be folly! We have the fame and numbers... I think we could make a difference. Or at least make a point.
What say you?
First of all, I think you overestimate our fame and importance.
Second of all, we're a plot group, not a political one. It wouldn't be right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:57 pm
Of course, you know, the best part about this is they didn't feel the need to tell us about it.
http://www.gaiaonline.com/forum/site-feedback/there-seems-to-be-a-glitch-in-the-announcement-system/t.33909975/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:58 pm
C:>
Actually, I changed my mind.
The best part about it is this:
Gaia is against the p-word, yes it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:32 am
Quinn Cillian I just had this beautiful idea...
What if the GIB AS A WHOLE made a big, public stand against it. Imagine Gaia trying to ban ALL OF US. Do you see the upheaval it would cause? They wouldn't dare remove a name as prestigious as the GIB from Gaia. It would be folly! We have the fame and numbers... I think we could make a difference. Or at least make a point.
What say you? I doubt that would work at all.From my experience, a lot of users don't really like us anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 7:40 am
Navlys Von Helson Quinn Cillian I just had this beautiful idea...
What if the GIB AS A WHOLE made a big, public stand against it. Imagine Gaia trying to ban ALL OF US. Do you see the upheaval it would cause? They wouldn't dare remove a name as prestigious as the GIB from Gaia. It would be folly! We have the fame and numbers... I think we could make a difference. Or at least make a point.
What say you? I doubt that would work at all.From my experience, a lot of users don't really like us anyway.
Sorry. I just got overcome in the moment. smile
But Gaia is really seeming quite superficial right now. Gah... this is rediculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:02 am
Ha.
That's absolutly ridiculous.
The sexual attraction of an adult to children.
or SAAC has been around for ages.
It's historic and nothing is wrong with it unless the feelings are acted upon.
mad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:41 am
`Manifest Ha. That's absolutly ridiculous. The sexual attraction of an adult to children. or SAAC has been around for ages. It's historic and nothing is wrong with it unless the feelings are acted upon. mad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:34 pm
Quinn Cillian `Manifest Ha. That's absolutly ridiculous. The sexual attraction of an adult to children. or SAAC has been around for ages. It's historic and nothing is wrong with it unless the feelings are acted upon. mad Yea, I have those feelings all the time. Erm... Woo hoo...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
