|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:10 pm
tangocat777 Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 Hmmmm.... Well, as we know, Sony and M$'s gaming divisions are losing quite a bit of money due to shelved systems. (in PS3's case, less software, and RRoD for M$) So whether or not they participate in the next gen is open to debate. (although I think egos will not allow them to surrender to Nintendo). They may decide to cash in on casuals, like Nintendo, but Nintendo will probably have a whole lot of support and a huge fanbase by then, so Nintendo's set unless the other two companies can come up with something to attract a larger market, or else make a profit by simply selling a few systems. Also, PS3 used red-ray last generation. According to my good friend Roy G. Biv, if we need more storage space, we'll turn to Vioet-ray. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... First off Tango, Sony and MS are major companies, no matter how well the Wii does this generation, it won't make Nintendo a larger company with more profit as Sony and MS have other divisions other than gaming. TV's, MP3 Players, Phones, Stereo systems, etc for Sony. Microsoft of course is major in the PC area. Both have a lot of resources to pull from, they won't back out of the gaming division so easily. And the Wii has done amazingly, but taking pride in the fact it has sold more than the 360 is a little much, it is far from having the majority of gamers in it's hands. The 360 and PS3 have quite a chunk of gamers. This is just the beginning and the Wii definitely hasn't taken over the market enough to put Sony and Microsoft down for the count. Now, secondly, I believe you mean the PS2 and PS1. Yes, they used red just like most before. The PS2's was more compact for the DVD support. And Blu-ray is really more Blue-violet than just Blue. So it's pretty close to violet ray. But that sort of thing would probably be even more expensive....but stopping at the end of the visible spectrum shouldn't be the goal I'm guessing. Gamma rays are hazardous, but I'm guessing since they have the most compact and fast wavelength, it would be amazingly fast for Data transfer....at least from what I've looked at from the electromagnetic radiation scale. But something like that is pretty far off I'm guessing. ....Somewhere I belong I'm pretty sure I mentioned that Sony and M$ won't surerender because of their egos, thank you very much. Oh, and don't say that Nintendo won't surpass Sony just yet. It's making profits like crazy, and it does have a hand in other markets. Like Blues said, Nintendo can put a sticker of Mario on anything and it will sell. Yes, the PS2, and all of the last generation. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... You said whether MS or Sony would be in the next generation was debatable. It has nothing to do with egos, they are both just major companies with a lot of resources to pull from. And why not say it? Sony and Microsoft aren't just gaming companies, they have a LOT of other markets to pull from. Maybe in the future, but not in this generation. Your point? Technology is advancing. That was the standard when optical discs and readers were made, red. ....Somewhere I belong
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:27 pm
Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 Hmmmm.... Well, as we know, Sony and M$'s gaming divisions are losing quite a bit of money due to shelved systems. (in PS3's case, less software, and RRoD for M$) So whether or not they participate in the next gen is open to debate. (although I think egos will not allow them to surrender to Nintendo). They may decide to cash in on casuals, like Nintendo, but Nintendo will probably have a whole lot of support and a huge fanbase by then, so Nintendo's set unless the other two companies can come up with something to attract a larger market, or else make a profit by simply selling a few systems. Also, PS3 used red-ray last generation. According to my good friend Roy G. Biv, if we need more storage space, we'll turn to Vioet-ray. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... First off Tango, Sony and MS are major companies, no matter how well the Wii does this generation, it won't make Nintendo a larger company with more profit as Sony and MS have other divisions other than gaming. TV's, MP3 Players, Phones, Stereo systems, etc for Sony. Microsoft of course is major in the PC area. Both have a lot of resources to pull from, they won't back out of the gaming division so easily. And the Wii has done amazingly, but taking pride in the fact it has sold more than the 360 is a little much, it is far from having the majority of gamers in it's hands. The 360 and PS3 have quite a chunk of gamers. This is just the beginning and the Wii definitely hasn't taken over the market enough to put Sony and Microsoft down for the count. Now, secondly, I believe you mean the PS2 and PS1. Yes, they used red just like most before. The PS2's was more compact for the DVD support. And Blu-ray is really more Blue-violet than just Blue. So it's pretty close to violet ray. But that sort of thing would probably be even more expensive....but stopping at the end of the visible spectrum shouldn't be the goal I'm guessing. Gamma rays are hazardous, but I'm guessing since they have the most compact and fast wavelength, it would be amazingly fast for Data transfer....at least from what I've looked at from the electromagnetic radiation scale. But something like that is pretty far off I'm guessing. ....Somewhere I belong I'm pretty sure I mentioned that Sony and M$ won't surerender because of their egos, thank you very much. Oh, and don't say that Nintendo won't surpass Sony just yet. It's making profits like crazy, and it does have a hand in other markets. Like Blues said, Nintendo can put a sticker of Mario on anything and it will sell. Yes, the PS2, and all of the last generation. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... You said whether MS or Sony would be in the next generation was debatable. It has nothing to do with egos, they are both just major companies with a lot of resources to pull from. And why not say it? Sony and Microsoft aren't just gaming companies, they have a LOT of other markets to pull from. Maybe in the future, but not in this generation. Your point? Technology is advancing. That was the standard when optical discs and readers were made, red. ....Somewhere I belong It has everything to do with egos, that's what keeps M$ and Sony from getting rid of a division that is taking losses instead of getting maximum profits from divisions that make money. Also, I don't have apoint to make with the PS2 other than red-rays are not the way forward, which was directed at Meta Fish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:39 pm
tangocat777 Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 Hmmmm.... Well, as we know, Sony and M$'s gaming divisions are losing quite a bit of money due to shelved systems. (in PS3's case, less software, and RRoD for M$) So whether or not they participate in the next gen is open to debate. (although I think egos will not allow them to surrender to Nintendo). They may decide to cash in on casuals, like Nintendo, but Nintendo will probably have a whole lot of support and a huge fanbase by then, so Nintendo's set unless the other two companies can come up with something to attract a larger market, or else make a profit by simply selling a few systems. Also, PS3 used red-ray last generation. According to my good friend Roy G. Biv, if we need more storage space, we'll turn to Vioet-ray. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... First off Tango, Sony and MS are major companies, no matter how well the Wii does this generation, it won't make Nintendo a larger company with more profit as Sony and MS have other divisions other than gaming. TV's, MP3 Players, Phones, Stereo systems, etc for Sony. Microsoft of course is major in the PC area. Both have a lot of resources to pull from, they won't back out of the gaming division so easily. And the Wii has done amazingly, but taking pride in the fact it has sold more than the 360 is a little much, it is far from having the majority of gamers in it's hands. The 360 and PS3 have quite a chunk of gamers. This is just the beginning and the Wii definitely hasn't taken over the market enough to put Sony and Microsoft down for the count. Now, secondly, I believe you mean the PS2 and PS1. Yes, they used red just like most before. The PS2's was more compact for the DVD support. And Blu-ray is really more Blue-violet than just Blue. So it's pretty close to violet ray. But that sort of thing would probably be even more expensive....but stopping at the end of the visible spectrum shouldn't be the goal I'm guessing. Gamma rays are hazardous, but I'm guessing since they have the most compact and fast wavelength, it would be amazingly fast for Data transfer....at least from what I've looked at from the electromagnetic radiation scale. But something like that is pretty far off I'm guessing. ....Somewhere I belong I'm pretty sure I mentioned that Sony and M$ won't surerender because of their egos, thank you very much. Oh, and don't say that Nintendo won't surpass Sony just yet. It's making profits like crazy, and it does have a hand in other markets. Like Blues said, Nintendo can put a sticker of Mario on anything and it will sell. Yes, the PS2, and all of the last generation. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... You said whether MS or Sony would be in the next generation was debatable. It has nothing to do with egos, they are both just major companies with a lot of resources to pull from. And why not say it? Sony and Microsoft aren't just gaming companies, they have a LOT of other markets to pull from. Maybe in the future, but not in this generation. Your point? Technology is advancing. That was the standard when optical discs and readers were made, red. ....Somewhere I belong It has everything to do with egos, that's what keeps M$ and Sony from getting rid of a division that is taking losses instead of getting maximum profits from divisions that make money. Also, I don't have apoint to make with the PS2 other than red-rays are not the way forward, which was directed at Meta Fish. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... Like it's been said time and time again, Microsoft(not sure if they still do or not) and Sony take losses on their actual consoles. Profit comes from the games, there are going to be more games sold than systems. Trying to make profit is a goal of every company, which Nintendo is just as guilty of as Microsoft or Sony. It has nothing to do with ego, just how companies work. The 1st priority is profit. ....Somewhere I belong
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:40 pm
PlayStation 4: Focusing on the hardware. PlayStation 3 has some excellent hardware, and with great hardware you can make awesome games. Sony will follow through with this and their main focus will be more hardware for more games.
Xbox 720: Focusing on the online connectivity. Xbox Live will be expanded like hell, bringing in things we thought unfathomable in terms of online play.
WiiRFamily: Nintendo will focus on their current demographic, aiming at the casual gamers. They'll make the most of the motion-sensing and the multiplayer. It'll basically be a souped up Wii.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:40 pm
Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 Hmmmm.... Well, as we know, Sony and M$'s gaming divisions are losing quite a bit of money due to shelved systems. (in PS3's case, less software, and RRoD for M$) So whether or not they participate in the next gen is open to debate. (although I think egos will not allow them to surrender to Nintendo). They may decide to cash in on casuals, like Nintendo, but Nintendo will probably have a whole lot of support and a huge fanbase by then, so Nintendo's set unless the other two companies can come up with something to attract a larger market, or else make a profit by simply selling a few systems. Also, PS3 used red-ray last generation. According to my good friend Roy G. Biv, if we need more storage space, we'll turn to Vioet-ray. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... First off Tango, Sony and MS are major companies, no matter how well the Wii does this generation, it won't make Nintendo a larger company with more profit as Sony and MS have other divisions other than gaming. TV's, MP3 Players, Phones, Stereo systems, etc for Sony. Microsoft of course is major in the PC area. Both have a lot of resources to pull from, they won't back out of the gaming division so easily. And the Wii has done amazingly, but taking pride in the fact it has sold more than the 360 is a little much, it is far from having the majority of gamers in it's hands. The 360 and PS3 have quite a chunk of gamers. This is just the beginning and the Wii definitely hasn't taken over the market enough to put Sony and Microsoft down for the count. Now, secondly, I believe you mean the PS2 and PS1. Yes, they used red just like most before. The PS2's was more compact for the DVD support. And Blu-ray is really more Blue-violet than just Blue. So it's pretty close to violet ray. But that sort of thing would probably be even more expensive....but stopping at the end of the visible spectrum shouldn't be the goal I'm guessing. Gamma rays are hazardous, but I'm guessing since they have the most compact and fast wavelength, it would be amazingly fast for Data transfer....at least from what I've looked at from the electromagnetic radiation scale. But something like that is pretty far off I'm guessing. ....Somewhere I belong I'm pretty sure I mentioned that Sony and M$ won't surerender because of their egos, thank you very much. Oh, and don't say that Nintendo won't surpass Sony just yet. It's making profits like crazy, and it does have a hand in other markets. Like Blues said, Nintendo can put a sticker of Mario on anything and it will sell. Yes, the PS2, and all of the last generation. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... You said whether MS or Sony would be in the next generation was debatable. It has nothing to do with egos, they are both just major companies with a lot of resources to pull from. And why not say it? Sony and Microsoft aren't just gaming companies, they have a LOT of other markets to pull from. Maybe in the future, but not in this generation. Your point? Technology is advancing. That was the standard when optical discs and readers were made, red. ....Somewhere I belong I hate Nintendo being in the disadvantage with that. Nintendo hasn't anything to pull from to improve with. That's why I don't understand why people go "Nintendo should have [insert tech]." It isn't their fault that companies who started in other industries decided to come into gaming. It's not fair they have no access to things that Sony and Microsoft do and they constantly get bashed for not having things. I praise Nintendo for being where they are at while being at such a disadvantage. My vote always goes to the bottom man. (not talking politics) I never liked the people always on top. I never liked them in school either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:59 pm
HistoryWak Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 Hmmmm.... Well, as we know, Sony and M$'s gaming divisions are losing quite a bit of money due to shelved systems. (in PS3's case, less software, and RRoD for M$) So whether or not they participate in the next gen is open to debate. (although I think egos will not allow them to surrender to Nintendo). They may decide to cash in on casuals, like Nintendo, but Nintendo will probably have a whole lot of support and a huge fanbase by then, so Nintendo's set unless the other two companies can come up with something to attract a larger market, or else make a profit by simply selling a few systems. Also, PS3 used red-ray last generation. According to my good friend Roy G. Biv, if we need more storage space, we'll turn to Vioet-ray. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... First off Tango, Sony and MS are major companies, no matter how well the Wii does this generation, it won't make Nintendo a larger company with more profit as Sony and MS have other divisions other than gaming. TV's, MP3 Players, Phones, Stereo systems, etc for Sony. Microsoft of course is major in the PC area. Both have a lot of resources to pull from, they won't back out of the gaming division so easily. And the Wii has done amazingly, but taking pride in the fact it has sold more than the 360 is a little much, it is far from having the majority of gamers in it's hands. The 360 and PS3 have quite a chunk of gamers. This is just the beginning and the Wii definitely hasn't taken over the market enough to put Sony and Microsoft down for the count. Now, secondly, I believe you mean the PS2 and PS1. Yes, they used red just like most before. The PS2's was more compact for the DVD support. And Blu-ray is really more Blue-violet than just Blue. So it's pretty close to violet ray. But that sort of thing would probably be even more expensive....but stopping at the end of the visible spectrum shouldn't be the goal I'm guessing. Gamma rays are hazardous, but I'm guessing since they have the most compact and fast wavelength, it would be amazingly fast for Data transfer....at least from what I've looked at from the electromagnetic radiation scale. But something like that is pretty far off I'm guessing. ....Somewhere I belong I'm pretty sure I mentioned that Sony and M$ won't surerender because of their egos, thank you very much. Oh, and don't say that Nintendo won't surpass Sony just yet. It's making profits like crazy, and it does have a hand in other markets. Like Blues said, Nintendo can put a sticker of Mario on anything and it will sell. Yes, the PS2, and all of the last generation. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... You said whether MS or Sony would be in the next generation was debatable. It has nothing to do with egos, they are both just major companies with a lot of resources to pull from. And why not say it? Sony and Microsoft aren't just gaming companies, they have a LOT of other markets to pull from. Maybe in the future, but not in this generation. Your point? Technology is advancing. That was the standard when optical discs and readers were made, red. ....Somewhere I belong I hate Nintendo being in the disadvantage with that. Nintendo hasn't anything to pull from to improve with. That's why I don't understand why people go "Nintendo should have [insert tech]." It isn't their fault that companies who started in other industries decided to come into gaming. It's not fair they have no access to things that Sony and Microsoft do and they constantly get bashed for not having things. I praise Nintendo for being where they are at while being at such a disadvantage. My vote always goes to the bottom man. (not talking politics) I never liked the people always on top. I never liked them in school either. You've got Trading Cards, TV shows, and more recently, ShoesAt Canis: but their gaming division as a whole is loosing money. Sony is loosing large amounts of money with every PS3 sold, and the 40GB models are going to sell better than what they have now. Also, they're not getting the huge royalies they did last generation. Not when for the time and money for one PS3 title, developers can make a lot of shovelware. As for M$, three year warranties on systems with a high failure rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:04 pm
tangocat777 HistoryWak Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 Hmmmm.... Well, as we know, Sony and M$'s gaming divisions are losing quite a bit of money due to shelved systems. (in PS3's case, less software, and RRoD for M$) So whether or not they participate in the next gen is open to debate. (although I think egos will not allow them to surrender to Nintendo). They may decide to cash in on casuals, like Nintendo, but Nintendo will probably have a whole lot of support and a huge fanbase by then, so Nintendo's set unless the other two companies can come up with something to attract a larger market, or else make a profit by simply selling a few systems. Also, PS3 used red-ray last generation. According to my good friend Roy G. Biv, if we need more storage space, we'll turn to Vioet-ray. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... First off Tango, Sony and MS are major companies, no matter how well the Wii does this generation, it won't make Nintendo a larger company with more profit as Sony and MS have other divisions other than gaming. TV's, MP3 Players, Phones, Stereo systems, etc for Sony. Microsoft of course is major in the PC area. Both have a lot of resources to pull from, they won't back out of the gaming division so easily. And the Wii has done amazingly, but taking pride in the fact it has sold more than the 360 is a little much, it is far from having the majority of gamers in it's hands. The 360 and PS3 have quite a chunk of gamers. This is just the beginning and the Wii definitely hasn't taken over the market enough to put Sony and Microsoft down for the count. Now, secondly, I believe you mean the PS2 and PS1. Yes, they used red just like most before. The PS2's was more compact for the DVD support. And Blu-ray is really more Blue-violet than just Blue. So it's pretty close to violet ray. But that sort of thing would probably be even more expensive....but stopping at the end of the visible spectrum shouldn't be the goal I'm guessing. Gamma rays are hazardous, but I'm guessing since they have the most compact and fast wavelength, it would be amazingly fast for Data transfer....at least from what I've looked at from the electromagnetic radiation scale. But something like that is pretty far off I'm guessing. ....Somewhere I belong I'm pretty sure I mentioned that Sony and M$ won't surerender because of their egos, thank you very much. Oh, and don't say that Nintendo won't surpass Sony just yet. It's making profits like crazy, and it does have a hand in other markets. Like Blues said, Nintendo can put a sticker of Mario on anything and it will sell. Yes, the PS2, and all of the last generation. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... You said whether MS or Sony would be in the next generation was debatable. It has nothing to do with egos, they are both just major companies with a lot of resources to pull from. And why not say it? Sony and Microsoft aren't just gaming companies, they have a LOT of other markets to pull from. Maybe in the future, but not in this generation. Your point? Technology is advancing. That was the standard when optical discs and readers were made, red. ....Somewhere I belong I hate Nintendo being in the disadvantage with that. Nintendo hasn't anything to pull from to improve with. That's why I don't understand why people go "Nintendo should have [insert tech]." It isn't their fault that companies who started in other industries decided to come into gaming. It's not fair they have no access to things that Sony and Microsoft do and they constantly get bashed for not having things. I praise Nintendo for being where they are at while being at such a disadvantage. My vote always goes to the bottom man. (not talking politics) I never liked the people always on top. I never liked them in school either. You've got Trading Cards, TV shows, and more recently, ShoesAt Canis: but their gaming division as a whole is loosing money. Sony is loosing large amounts of money with every PS3 sold, and the 40GB models are going to sell better than what they have now. Also, they're not getting the huge royalies they did last generation. Not when for the time and money for one PS3 title, developers can make a lot of shovelware. As for M$, three year warranties on systems with a high failure rate. The trading cards are either being made into games or just as a trading card game. I'm talking about something they can improve the console with. I don't think they can do that with shoes... they gave up on the e-reader on the cards. For tv shows there isn't too much that will improve a console with using it. EDIT: Could you imagine virtual shoes! Nevermind bad idea....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:09 pm
HistoryWak tangocat777 HistoryWak Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 I'm pretty sure I mentioned that Sony and M$ won't surerender because of their egos, thank you very much. Oh, and don't say that Nintendo won't surpass Sony just yet. It's making profits like crazy, and it does have a hand in other markets. Like Blues said, Nintendo can put a sticker of Mario on anything and it will sell. Yes, the PS2, and all of the last generation. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... You said whether MS or Sony would be in the next generation was debatable. It has nothing to do with egos, they are both just major companies with a lot of resources to pull from. And why not say it? Sony and Microsoft aren't just gaming companies, they have a LOT of other markets to pull from. Maybe in the future, but not in this generation. Your point? Technology is advancing. That was the standard when optical discs and readers were made, red. ....Somewhere I belong I hate Nintendo being in the disadvantage with that. Nintendo hasn't anything to pull from to improve with. That's why I don't understand why people go "Nintendo should have [insert tech]." It isn't their fault that companies who started in other industries decided to come into gaming. It's not fair they have no access to things that Sony and Microsoft do and they constantly get bashed for not having things. I praise Nintendo for being where they are at while being at such a disadvantage. My vote always goes to the bottom man. (not talking politics) I never liked the people always on top. I never liked them in school either. You've got Trading Cards, TV shows, and more recently, ShoesAt Canis: but their gaming division as a whole is loosing money. Sony is loosing large amounts of money with every PS3 sold, and the 40GB models are going to sell better than what they have now. Also, they're not getting the huge royalies they did last generation. Not when for the time and money for one PS3 title, developers can make a lot of shovelware. As for M$, three year warranties on systems with a high failure rate. The trading cards are either being made into games or just as a trading card game. I'm talking about something they can improve the console with. I don't think they can do that with shoes... they gave up on the e-reader on the cards. For tv shows there isn't too much that will improve a console with using it. EDIT: Could you imagine virtual shoes! Nevermind bad idea.... The Mii's feet are probably cold right now.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:21 pm
tangocat777 HistoryWak Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 Hmmmm.... Well, as we know, Sony and M$'s gaming divisions are losing quite a bit of money due to shelved systems. (in PS3's case, less software, and RRoD for M$) So whether or not they participate in the next gen is open to debate. (although I think egos will not allow them to surrender to Nintendo). They may decide to cash in on casuals, like Nintendo, but Nintendo will probably have a whole lot of support and a huge fanbase by then, so Nintendo's set unless the other two companies can come up with something to attract a larger market, or else make a profit by simply selling a few systems. Also, PS3 used red-ray last generation. According to my good friend Roy G. Biv, if we need more storage space, we'll turn to Vioet-ray. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... First off Tango, Sony and MS are major companies, no matter how well the Wii does this generation, it won't make Nintendo a larger company with more profit as Sony and MS have other divisions other than gaming. TV's, MP3 Players, Phones, Stereo systems, etc for Sony. Microsoft of course is major in the PC area. Both have a lot of resources to pull from, they won't back out of the gaming division so easily. And the Wii has done amazingly, but taking pride in the fact it has sold more than the 360 is a little much, it is far from having the majority of gamers in it's hands. The 360 and PS3 have quite a chunk of gamers. This is just the beginning and the Wii definitely hasn't taken over the market enough to put Sony and Microsoft down for the count. Now, secondly, I believe you mean the PS2 and PS1. Yes, they used red just like most before. The PS2's was more compact for the DVD support. And Blu-ray is really more Blue-violet than just Blue. So it's pretty close to violet ray. But that sort of thing would probably be even more expensive....but stopping at the end of the visible spectrum shouldn't be the goal I'm guessing. Gamma rays are hazardous, but I'm guessing since they have the most compact and fast wavelength, it would be amazingly fast for Data transfer....at least from what I've looked at from the electromagnetic radiation scale. But something like that is pretty far off I'm guessing. ....Somewhere I belong I'm pretty sure I mentioned that Sony and M$ won't surerender because of their egos, thank you very much. Oh, and don't say that Nintendo won't surpass Sony just yet. It's making profits like crazy, and it does have a hand in other markets. Like Blues said, Nintendo can put a sticker of Mario on anything and it will sell. Yes, the PS2, and all of the last generation. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... You said whether MS or Sony would be in the next generation was debatable. It has nothing to do with egos, they are both just major companies with a lot of resources to pull from. And why not say it? Sony and Microsoft aren't just gaming companies, they have a LOT of other markets to pull from. Maybe in the future, but not in this generation. Your point? Technology is advancing. That was the standard when optical discs and readers were made, red. ....Somewhere I belong I hate Nintendo being in the disadvantage with that. Nintendo hasn't anything to pull from to improve with. That's why I don't understand why people go "Nintendo should have [insert tech]." It isn't their fault that companies who started in other industries decided to come into gaming. It's not fair they have no access to things that Sony and Microsoft do and they constantly get bashed for not having things. I praise Nintendo for being where they are at while being at such a disadvantage. My vote always goes to the bottom man. (not talking politics) I never liked the people always on top. I never liked them in school either. You've got Trading Cards, TV shows, and more recently, ShoesAt Canis: but their gaming division as a whole is loosing money. Sony is loosing large amounts of money with every PS3 sold, and the 40GB models are going to sell better than what they have now. Also, they're not getting the huge royalies they did last generation. Not when for the time and money for one PS3 title, developers can make a lot of shovelware. As for M$, three year warranties on systems with a high failure rate. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... I believe Sony did the same thing with the PS1 and PS2. Not sure, but incorporating new technology in consoles will make them really expensive at first, so they take a loss at first...but as mass production kicks in and makes the hardware cheaper, the loss gets smaller and smaller and eventually turns into profit. Profit comes from software, and then soon hardware after it gets cheaper to produce. Don't look at now, look at will happen. As a response to Wak, I'm not putting down Nintendo in anyway, I'm just saying that it will be really hard for Nintendo to knock Sony or MS out of the gaming division as they both have a lot of resources to pull from. I actually admire Nintendo from going on strong from just games. I don't see them being in any other market except games. Nintendo is just really good at it and has been doing it for years. ....Somewhere I belong
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:28 pm
Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 HistoryWak Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 I'm pretty sure I mentioned that Sony and M$ won't surerender because of their egos, thank you very much. Oh, and don't say that Nintendo won't surpass Sony just yet. It's making profits like crazy, and it does have a hand in other markets. Like Blues said, Nintendo can put a sticker of Mario on anything and it will sell. Yes, the PS2, and all of the last generation. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... You said whether MS or Sony would be in the next generation was debatable. It has nothing to do with egos, they are both just major companies with a lot of resources to pull from. And why not say it? Sony and Microsoft aren't just gaming companies, they have a LOT of other markets to pull from. Maybe in the future, but not in this generation. Your point? Technology is advancing. That was the standard when optical discs and readers were made, red. ....Somewhere I belong I hate Nintendo being in the disadvantage with that. Nintendo hasn't anything to pull from to improve with. That's why I don't understand why people go "Nintendo should have [insert tech]." It isn't their fault that companies who started in other industries decided to come into gaming. It's not fair they have no access to things that Sony and Microsoft do and they constantly get bashed for not having things. I praise Nintendo for being where they are at while being at such a disadvantage. My vote always goes to the bottom man. (not talking politics) I never liked the people always on top. I never liked them in school either. You've got Trading Cards, TV shows, and more recently, ShoesAt Canis: but their gaming division as a whole is loosing money. Sony is loosing large amounts of money with every PS3 sold, and the 40GB models are going to sell better than what they have now. Also, they're not getting the huge royalies they did last generation. Not when for the time and money for one PS3 title, developers can make a lot of shovelware. As for M$, three year warranties on systems with a high failure rate. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... I believe Sony did the same thing with the PS1 and PS2. Not sure, but incorporating new technology in consoles will make them really expensive at first, so they take a loss at first...but as mass production kicks in and makes the hardware cheaper, the loss gets smaller and smaller and eventually turns into profit. Profit comes from software, and then soon hardware after it gets cheaper to produce. Don't look at now, look at will happen. As a response to Wak, I'm not putting down Nintendo in anyway, I'm just saying that it will be really hard for Nintendo to knock Sony or MS out of the gaming division as they both have a lot of resources to pull from. I actually admire Nintendo from going on strong from just games. I don't see them being in any other market except games. Nintendo is just really good at it and has been doing it for years. ....Somewhere I belong Greeeeeeeaaaaaat....... I think we're done here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:38 pm
Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 HistoryWak Canis Lupus the LoneWolf tangocat777 I'm pretty sure I mentioned that Sony and M$ won't surerender because of their egos, thank you very much. Oh, and don't say that Nintendo won't surpass Sony just yet. It's making profits like crazy, and it does have a hand in other markets. Like Blues said, Nintendo can put a sticker of Mario on anything and it will sell. Yes, the PS2, and all of the last generation. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... You said whether MS or Sony would be in the next generation was debatable. It has nothing to do with egos, they are both just major companies with a lot of resources to pull from. And why not say it? Sony and Microsoft aren't just gaming companies, they have a LOT of other markets to pull from. Maybe in the future, but not in this generation. Your point? Technology is advancing. That was the standard when optical discs and readers were made, red. ....Somewhere I belong I hate Nintendo being in the disadvantage with that. Nintendo hasn't anything to pull from to improve with. That's why I don't understand why people go "Nintendo should have [insert tech]." It isn't their fault that companies who started in other industries decided to come into gaming. It's not fair they have no access to things that Sony and Microsoft do and they constantly get bashed for not having things. I praise Nintendo for being where they are at while being at such a disadvantage. My vote always goes to the bottom man. (not talking politics) I never liked the people always on top. I never liked them in school either. You've got Trading Cards, TV shows, and more recently, ShoesAt Canis: but their gaming division as a whole is loosing money. Sony is loosing large amounts of money with every PS3 sold, and the 40GB models are going to sell better than what they have now. Also, they're not getting the huge royalies they did last generation. Not when for the time and money for one PS3 title, developers can make a lot of shovelware. As for M$, three year warranties on systems with a high failure rate. I wanna find something I've wanted all along.... I believe Sony did the same thing with the PS1 and PS2. Not sure, but incorporating new technology in consoles will make them really expensive at first, so they take a loss at first...but as mass production kicks in and makes the hardware cheaper, the loss gets smaller and smaller and eventually turns into profit. Profit comes from software, and then soon hardware after it gets cheaper to produce. Don't look at now, look at will happen. As a response to Wak, I'm not putting down Nintendo in anyway, I'm just saying that it will be really hard for Nintendo to knock Sony or MS out of the gaming division as they both have a lot of resources to pull from. I actually admire Nintendo from going on strong from just games. I don't see them being in any other market except games. Nintendo is just really good at it and has been doing it for years. ....Somewhere I belong I know you weren't. I just had to get that out. wink You're right about the knocking out M and Sony.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:40 am
Nintendo Wii2.0
As you realize, the Wii is selling very well at this time. But at one point that will change at the later part of this generation. With the ever increasing of hard core games because of the Wii being an entry console. More people wanted to play games with better graphics because they were sick of the Wii being the weakest console. In the meantime, Nintendo still felt that the Wii did very well, so they created another strange console and still say that they don't care about graphics. This made most gamers start to question Nintendo and sales were very low. Of cores the Wii 2.0 was the cheapest console, boasting that it was only $100 did attract some new gamers, but that wasn't enough to save them in the long run.
PS4
With the downfall of the Wii, the PS3 started to send out a ton of great games which drew most of the old Nintendo fans. The ps3 will reduce its price to 300 dollars which made it the top selling console. SONY realized with the success of downloadable games for the PS3, so they made their entire ps4 lineup downloadable. The PS4 also had a huge graphics upgrade, which was made possible with the new cell processor 2. The controller was similar to the ps3 version, but with a few new buttons and an improved tilt sensor. The ps3 will still sell well into the next generation so the ps4 had a faster blur-ray drive. The PS3 also had a terabyte of HDD space. The PS4 will also have advanced connectivity with the PSP2. The PS4 was able to load games from the PSP2 and play them on the television with the PS4 controller. The PS4 will support 16 controllers on 1 console because they expect most people will have huge tvs by then because the price for tvs will drop dramatically. The graphics for this system are so realistic, that players literally thought it was a window in time in space. Once again SONY made the most expensive console, but it was still much less then a computer with the same power.
Xbox720
The Xbox was considered the new guy and people expected it to not do well in the gaming market, but it proved them wrong. The Xbox360 did very well and will continue to do well until the lunch of the Xbox 720. Since the Xbox 360 launched 1 year earlier then the rest, Microsoft was able to launch the Xbox 720 1 year earlier then the other two. Microsoft finally added the motion sensitivity to the controller and made every new game downloadable because of its most successful downloadable 360 content. The 500 gig HDD was more then enough to handle all of the new games that come out for the system, and later on , newer and more spacious versions became available. The Xbox720 also had a better way to play old Xbox and Xbox360 games. The System could now support 8 controllers on one television so you don't have to bring 4 consoles to play 16 people in a LAN party. Even though the Xbox720 is not as powerful as the PS4, it still packs a punch in the graphics department. Its price was 100 dollars less then the PS4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
