|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:47 pm
I'll chastise weather I have the right or not, thank you. And I'm not bitching at you for agreeing, its because you do it so condescendingly.
I don't know what you mean by "not recognising vowels". I recognize their existance, though I may not use every vowel in every possible position. And if you're just pointing out holes in my transcription, well, its not like I was giving an extremely accurate scientific breakdown of all facets of my speech, so, yeah, its not 100% correct. But it should be good enough that common sense should make up for the finer details. If its the fact that I'm using "r" where ɚ would be mroe correct, I generally don't bother with that specific symbol, because again, common sense should make up for it, and its one less character to copy and paste.
Now, your transcription there sounds to me like you're over-anunciating (sp?). So then, unless you speak with your mouth as wide as you would if you had a baseball in it, to quote you, you must be typing wrong or theres something wrong with your transcription. I've never heard anyone speak like that unless they're talking to someone with hearing problems and/or incapable of closing their mouth all the way.
And I'm going to point out again, people talk differently in different areas. We don't come from the same backround, so we speak differently. If I speak like I've got a mouth full of peanut butter, or you do like you have a mouth the size of a pelican, neither is wrong, even if we both sound stupid to each other.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:37 pm
·:Actually, I'm UNDER-annunciating, just to a lesser degree than you. And if you speak out-loud I'm sure you're not keeping your mouth zipped up. It's not like I'm shouting each syllable like I'm trying to talk to Helen Keller. I'm saying it very quickly and breaking apart every sound. Over-annunciating would be:
"ɔːl hjuːmən̩ biːɪŋs ɑɹ bɔəɹn fɹiː ænd iːkwəl ɪn dɪgnəti ænd ɹaɪt͡s" which is FAR from what I've typed:
"ɔɫ hjumən biːiŋz ɚ bɔɹn fɹi ɛn ikwəɫ ən dɪgnəɺi ən rait͡s"
And you can't blame ME for making fun of the way you talk if YOU transcribe it wrong. Common sense doesn't make up for your errors. No one can look at the sentence and think "Well, he surely doesn't speak like that, he really meant this."
Forgive me for thinking you meant what you typed... ¬_¬
And I'm not being condescending; I'm taking what you say at face value. If I wanted to be condescending I'd comment on the irony of your attempt to justify your inscription when the past few of your posts have had multiple spelling errors.
Oops.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:40 pm
Okay, maybe I underestimated the extent of other peoples common sense.
How about this: point out the errors specifically, so that I can see what the problem is.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:43 pm
Vajra B. Hairava Okay, maybe I underestimated the extent of other peoples common sense. How about this: point out the errors specifically, so that I can see what the problem is. ·:You're not underestimating common sense so much as you're assuming that everyone will read a piece of data and interpret it the same way you will. This is the same error encountered when I tried to decipher your code thing. You assume that what's obvious to you is obvious to them.ɔl hju mn biŋz r born fri n ikwl n dɪgndi n raɪts ·:Maybe you do say it like this... but it's likely that there's a ə or some other vowel between the m and n. Otherwise it would sound a lot like "hum" [hjum]. See "damn" for a good example of that happening.ɔl hjumn biŋz r born fri n ikwl n dɪgndi n raɪts ·:You know this one.ɔl hjumn biŋz r bo rn f ri n ikwl n dɪgndi n raɪts ·:Do you roll your Rs?ɔl hjumn biŋz r born fri n ikwl n dɪgndi n raɪts ·:I might see where you're getting this, but it's actually more work and there's a pause if you don't put an /ə/ before the n.ɔl hjumn biŋz r born fri n ik wl n dɪgndi n raɪts ·:Same deal.ɔl hjumn biŋz r born fri n ikwl n dɪgndi n r aɪts ·:This isn't your mistake but I'm pointing it out because I accidentally used /i/ instead of /ɪ/ in mine.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:20 pm
Here you are. Sorry I didn't preserve all your colours, but you can tell whats going on I hope. Red August ɔl hju mn biŋz r born fri n ikwl n dɪgndi n raɪts ·:Maybe you do say it like this... but it's likely that there's a ə or some other vowel between the m and n. Otherwise it would sound a lot like "hum" [hjum]. See "damn" for a good example of that happening.Nope, that is how I say it. I believe that the "n" of "damn" is a residual feature of spelling, because notice that in the word "damnation" the "n" is pronounced. So, I do say /hyumn/. Red August ɔl hjumn biŋz r born fri n ikwl n dɪgndi n raɪts You know this one. You're saying that it should be this /ɚ/, right? Well, as far as I have ever known, That and just the letter R make basically the same sound, but denote different functions in a word. I thought that it oughta be pretty obvious that it just represents this sound. As far as my ears can tell, the sound /ɹ/ (which I believe is in the recording above) and the "r-colored vowel" /ɚ/ make the exact same sound. Tell me if they don't, but to me, they sound the same. So, I thought it would be completely obvious and unmistakeable what sound I was getting at. Of course there is room for interpretation in anything, but to me, that seemes so blatantly obvious, I thought you'd understand. Red August ɔl hjumn biŋz r bo rn f ri n ikwl n dɪgndi n raɪts ·:Do you roll your Rs?Ugh, okay, technically, I should use the symbol /ɹ/, right? Well, I thought that in broad transcription of English, for sinmplicity they usually just use the normal r, it being obvious what it is in the context of most dialects of English. It says this in the article: "Some phonemic transcriptions use the /r/ symbol instead of /ɹ/ for the 'r' sound for ease of typesetting, even though that technically represents the alveolar trill." Thats whay I was going by. Red August ɔl hjumn biŋz r born fri n ikwl n dɪgndi n raɪts I might see where you're getting this, but it's actually more work and there's a pause if you don't put an /ə/ before the n. I'd say that thats a relative thing. For me, its easier to leave it out. Red August ɔl hjumn biŋz r born fri n ik wl n dɪgndi n raɪts ·:Same deal.Same deal again. I feel totally comfortable saying it the way I have there. Red August ɔl hjumn biŋz r born fri n ikwl n dɪgndi n r aɪts ·:This isn't your mistake but I'm pointing it out because I accidentally used /i/ instead of /ɪ/ in mine.Okay then. ~ So, are my "errors" really that bad? It was that hard to understand? Yes, I used the plain r instead of the turned one, but I'm fairly sure that is a standard practice. And I ignored the actual symbol for the "r-colored vowel" and just used r again, but as far as I can tell, they make the same sound, and it seemed so completely obvious to me what my intention was, that there should be no way anyone would mistake it. Minor technicalities, but not anything I would have excpected to turn out to be such a big deal. And the other things that you point out, they aren't actually errors, they are really the way I speak! Really. I don't see how it is a transcription error, if thats what I actually do.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:05 pm
·:No, /ɚ/ and /ɹ/ aren't the same. /ɹ/ is a consonant and cannot really exist on its own because it's voiced. (Think of how /g/ can't exist on its own without becoming a /k/)
And really... if you're REALLY saying "n" for "and" then you're saying "free nequal" or "freen equal". Is that right? Does "n" have its own syllable or does it merge with the words around it? If it merges, you're right. You're just saying /n/. If it doesn't, you're either pausing for a very short time (free [pause] n [pause] equal [like a glottal stop maybe?]) or you're actually putting a vowel in there to separate it from the word "free" and don't realize it.
And "ikwl" is impossible to say. /w/ and /l/ are both approximates. They can't be pronounced without another sound thrown in there either before (bow, fall [dark L in fall sometimes]) or after (winter, let).
My boyfriend's home now so I have to get dinner ready. I promised him I would. Plus the company that owns our place is coming to look at it and it's not clean yet.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:22 pm
Well, I happen to have no problem saying /r/ on its own. And also, it merges with the "z" sound in "beings", so its not like its alone anyhow. You could say that there is a hardly traceable release of air initially right before the voicing starts if I say it alone or at the beginning of a word, but every voiced consonant has that. And that moment is so tiny, it is inaudible, and theres not much of a reason to indicate it.
Maybe its that I pronounce /ɚ/ and /ɹ/ the same? Maybe I just use /ɚ/ always or something, because I can not tell the 2 apart at all, and I have no problem saying it by itself.
Yes, the n merges with the words around it, same way that the "r" above does. I'm not putting a vowel and not realizing it, its as if my prepositions and similar words have eroded to case endings that get squished directly into the word.
Well, I can say "wl" just fine. You could say that for a fraction of a second, if I pronounce it slowly there is the /β̞/ sound inbetween. But, I think that that only comes up during the little transition period from one sound to another. Halfway between the w position and the L position, for a split second its in the vage place the produces that sound. But its such a tiny unhear-able amount, I find it to be negligeable. And so when I say it, it just sounds like "wl".
Go ahead and do that, I can't stop ye.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 6:55 pm
·:Ok, a few questions:
"Well, I happen to have no problem saying /r/ on its own. And also, it merges with the "z" sound in "beings""
·:/r/ in "beings"? What??
"because I can not tell [/ɚ/ and /ɹ/] apart at all"
·:I've tried to explain this to you so many times... /ɚ/ is what you hear when you say "her". Ok? I want you to REALLY focus on that sound. Now say "red". That's a /ɹ/ UNLESS you happen to be someone from the mid-west who likes to say "red" like "uhred" then they might fuse together.
But if you're unsure about whether it's a /ɚ/ or /ɹ/ when you're speaking, say "her" and compare it to the "er" sound. If it's not identical, it's probably /ɹ/. ·:Examples: /ɚ/ her turn burn were fur lurk quirk /ɹ/ red barn mars far ran hairava?
"as if my prepositions and similar words have eroded to case endings that get squished directly into the word. "
·:So "free nequal" like I said above? That makes a lot more sense and sounds way more normal.
"Well, I can say "wl" just fine."
·:I hate to say it to you like this, but: No, no you can't. If the sound /wl/ was really possible, then don't you think the pronunciation for "owl" would be /owl/? It's not though, it's /aʊl/. If you want to defend yourself here, think of a word that has /w/ or /l/ in a position with no vowel before or after it. If you can't do that, try saying /w/ without putting a vowel before or after it. Try doing the same for /l/. If you say "I can do it" what's really happening is that you're saying a vowel instead of /w/ and /ɬ/ instead of /l/. That /w/ sound occurs when your lips separate and your vocal cords are vibrating.
To see what letters CAN stand by themselves, simply stop your vocal cords from moving. Don't think of whispering, it's even quieter than that. All you hear is the unvoiced consonants. Those are the sounds that may stand alone. Sometimes nasals stand alone (/n/, /m/) but /l/ and /w/ definitely may not. They're approximates for god's sake.
Maybe since you're into the Sanskrit thing you're saying l̩ and r̩. I mean... Ok, I'm being too black & white about it... /l/, in RARE instances, can be syllabic but the likelihood of you saying it with /w/ is just.... well... I don't want to say it's impossible but.. I'll never believe you're really saying /wl/... let's put it that way. I have yet to see proof that it can happen.
Now I'm just rambling.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:09 pm
R as in this, the alveolar approximant, /ɹ/. I know that you've tried to explain. The /ɚ/ of "her" and the /r/ of "red" sound exactly the same to me. Is it that one comes at the beginning of a word, and one at the end? I'm sorry, I'm not trying to be stubborn, but I can not distinguish the 2 at all. Same goes for that list. I understand what you're getting at, but the /ɚ/ or /r/ in all of those words sound exactly the same to me. They are identical. Yes, "free nequal" is pretty much it. About "wl". Okay. I don't see why you insist it is impossible. "If you want to defend yourself here, think of a word that has /w/ or /l/ in a position with no vowel before or after it. Well, theres the word "equal" again. Sure in spelling, its not like that, but in my pronunciation of it, it sounds like "ikwl" to me. If you can't do that, try saying /w/ without putting a vowel before or after it. Try doing the same for /l/. If you say "I can do it" what's really happening is that you're saying a vowel instead of /w/ and /ɬ/ instead of /l/.""I can do it", I say. Okay then, what vowel would I be using instead of /w/? Because the /w/ in my /ikwl/ sounds just like the /w/ of other words, "wiggle", "womp", "whisker". That would mean that whatever vowel I am substituting for /w/, I'm using it all across the board. And /ɬ/? I know what that sounds like, and I am not using that. Woud you consider this recording to be an accurate depiction of that sound? If you do, than I'm not saying that sound. To see what letters CAN stand by themselves, simply stop your vocal cords from moving. Don't think of whispering, it's even quieter than that. All you hear is the unvoiced consonants. Those are the sounds that may stand alone. Sometimes nasals stand alone (/n/, /m/) but /l/ and /w/ definitely may not. They're approximates for god's sake.So speak with out voicing anything? Okay. Now, heres the thing: I can pronounce /l/ and /w/ like that. Really. Maybe I am using l̩ and r̩ then. And I haven't seem proof that /wl/ can't happen, and I'll never believe that it is impossible, since despite what you say, unless it is that in every instance of a /w/ in my speech I am replacing it with some other vowel, I am saying it how I am telling you. I just don't see why. All these things you say I just can't do, they're working out fine for me.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:55 pm
·:I'm not trying to be condescending but, I don't put all this research into these topics to have it answered so simply and shot down with "I can do it anyway."
If you can't differentiate between the /ɚ/ and the /r/ then I don't expect you to know when you're using w as a vowel and not a consonant. When I have the time and patience I'll record this in an audio file or maybe a video because typing is going nowhere.
In the meantime I'm done with this conversation because financial problems just smacked me in the face...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:06 pm
Sorry about that, but I'm not going to take "you just can't do that" as an answer either. Because, I haven't heard anything from you against it besides that. I don't care about your research, if I can get some credible source giving an explanation of why it is impossible, maybe I'll see it. And I don't consider some person on the internet to be that.
And I'll propose again, that there are different ways of speaking. Not distinguishing /ɚ/ and the /r/ doesn't make me stuipd, maybe I just don't talk like that. If you just can't accept that, then I can't excpect to get anything out of talking to you anyhow.
But, If its that you are saying that its just against the laws of phonetics, show me someday why that is. I'm pretty damn sure about what I'm doing with my mouth, and I'm pretty sure I'm not as clueless as you take me for. But if I am totalyl wrong, please give me a good explanation. Otherwise, until then, I won't believe anything you say any more than you believe me.
So until then, let's agree to not agree, though I know you still think I'm wrong.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:33 pm
·:I FOUND THE TIME to upload a video!!!!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4Dab_pTCJI I ramble and act like an idiot in much of it but I tried really hard to get my point across... 10 minutes is not enough. I should've broken it up into segments but 6 takes to get just those 10 minutes right I were pretty rough on me.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:49 pm
I haven't watched the video yet, I will right after this post.
What I suggest is if we keep on disagreeing is that we bring in someone who knows more than either of us, Like IE, she surely can solve this.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:00 pm
Vajra B. Hairava I haven't watched the video yet, I will right after this post. What I suggest is if we keep on disagreeing is that we bring in someone who knows more than either of us, Like IE, she surely can solve this. ·:So as not to offend anyone, I'm simply going to say "No" and nothing more...
No.
ʇsnᵷnɐ
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|