|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:37 am
Mod forum. No. Eventually. Communism. Quote: Now would be good. Let's have them now. *handwave* These are not the scores you are looking for. Go about your business.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:45 am
*Picks up some droids on the street corner and shoves them in his car trunk.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 3:13 pm
-smokes a bong-
Duuuuuuuuuuuude.
I sense... a disturbance... in the Force mannn.
Far out.
-resumes making sniffing noises-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:46 pm
Simply this, I want to know if it was my situation that caused the rule change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:50 pm
MerDefsGirl Simply this, I want to know if it was my situation that caused the rule change. No, it was the Krausse vs. Vrael fight. It called to question a concern about what would be a valid count out for this type of arena. Since I came up with the arena for round 2 in like an hour, I didn't review it enough to check to see if it would be enjoyable. Therefore, any complications of people going into the water before this rule change will be disregarded since it's a change on my part.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 12:23 am
So I have no chance of completing my ring out attempt. Just post, "MDG, you have no hope of achieving your ring out". It will be clear, my dreams of easy victory will be crushed, and I will fight on from there.
OOC 3289
Edit: redface Saw in fight post, I'll go with that.
3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:39 pm
I'm usually on MSN for quick questions, FYI.
mingan29@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:41 pm
So, essentially, you decided to nix any chance someone has of forcing an opponent into a ring out?
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Female of the Species
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:53 pm
Or, alternatively, he's allowing people to go into the water.
Which, as a water element kind of guy, I find awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:38 pm
Vintrict, drop me a PM, read my post in my fight, or get ahold of me on MSN. I need to clarify the little issue I had.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:28 pm
So, also, I call for a vote that Vintrict should not be allowed to touch Iden Vs. Vince, especially after what happened last round with KB Vs. Iden and the retarded bias he seemed to show against KB.
Just don't feel as if I'd have very good odds, especially after the disagreement he and I just had. I'm sure other people agree, at this point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:34 pm
I have a single request I would like to make.
In judging my thread (and ideally all threads I participate in beyond this point) I would like to respectfully request that Vintrict not be part of the three judge panel responsible for the outcome of the fight.
There are a multitude of individual reasons for this, but they all boil down to a singular lack of confidence in his ability to perform the role in a consistent and unbiased manner.
...dammit, Vince. Beat me to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:38 pm
Thank you for your concerns. They will be presented to the council for consideration...
What the hell, guys. I wasn't biased when I judged KB, so that doesn't mean I'm going to be biased if I do your fight. I made a judgment call, not to go against anyone, but merely to keep to the rules I've established. So don't disrespect my role as a judge because you guys are putting your personal feelings in front of the justifications.
Just chill and realize that if you do something wrong, a judge is going to call on you for it. I hate that things have gotten too lax around here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:44 pm
To argue my point, I'm not questioning that you're biased for or against Vince. I'm mostly concerned that your rulings are inconsistent and thus prone to being...well, off kilter. I source my argument both in the current fight, the previous one, and all over the profile acceptance stage.
That said, it's not like it's really worth getting butthurt over in the long run, so I'll leave it to the council's decision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:50 pm
exp. 99 To argue my point, I'm not questioning that you're biased for or against Vince. I'm mostly concerned that your rulings are inconsistent and thus prone to being...well, off kilter. I source my argument both in the current fight, the previous one, and all over the profile acceptance stage. That said, it's not like it's really worth getting butthurt over in the long run, so I'll leave it to the council's decision. ^ This
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
