|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 4:09 pm
LedZeppelinGirl Personally, I haven't had sex yet, (one of the few in my circle of friends), and my friends always poke fun and say that I'm holding out. Which is true, in fact. I would rather wait to have sex with someone I can see myself being with for a long time, if not my whole life. I doubt I'd be able to handle a baby, so I would take precautions if I was having sex on a constant basis.
I know a girl who is my age (15), and she's already had a baby, and is out of school currently to take care of it. I don't know if she's going to stay out of school, but for her sake, I hope she continues to highschool so she can have a better future.
So for me, I would rather wait another year or two. If it happens, it happens, I guess. [...♥] 3nodding That's exactly what I plan to do. I'm only 15. I in NO way ready to do that sort of thing. I have a boyfriend of about six months, but I don't want to try anything like that. If we stick together for a while longer, maybe. But untill then I have no plans of any sort of action in that manor.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 4:11 pm
Agreed.
And I haven't had a significant other (boyfriend is the wrong word) for about two years, so it'll be a while before I discuss it with anyone.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 4:14 pm
the wolf girl @skits- Thats what i mean. I dont want it to be for nothing for anyone. want some one i love. I know this one couple she will do any guy to get what she wants and her bf is the same way. she doesnt even like her bf. I am the only one of my friends who has never been pregnant or had a missed period scare or a STD scare. [...♥]Exactly. That's another reason, the side effects that come with it aren't worth a couple hours of sexual pleasure. @LedZeppelin - Eh, most boys aren't worth time. Plus from what I've seen You're too pretty for most guys anyway!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 4:34 pm
... sweatdrop
...Interesting conversation... ninja
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 4:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 4:52 pm
I had sex within a year of having my first 'sexual' encounter.
I lost my virginity at 16.
I do NOT believe that teenagers need sex, however. I think that the only people who should engage in sex are people who are mature enough to respect and handle it AND the possible consequences of their actions. Not a lot of teenagers are ready for the responsibility.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 5:02 pm
Xyloid I had sex within a year of having my first 'sexual' encounter.
I lost my virginity at 16.
I do NOT believe that teenagers need sex, however. I think that the only people who should engage in sex are people who are mature enough to respect and handle it AND the possible consequences of their actions. Not a lot of teenagers are ready for the responsibility.
[...♥]I agree, you made a really good point about the maturity aspect of sex. One I had forgotten to bring up.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 10:31 pm
Spiess Skits Miss Almalexia I don't see a problem with underage/teenage sex. If their body has hit puberty and they're sexually developed then why should we tell them they're not ready yet? The risk of STDs and pregnancy is always there and solutions (medication, abortion, adoption) are there too. Doing something because of peer or media pressure is always wrong, but listening to your body is certainly nothing bad. razz [...♥]It is wrong. You're anywhere from 13-16/17 years old you really don't need that kind of pleasure. You shouldn't want it either. Kids push growing up WAY to fast and end up regreting it in the end. Why is it wrong? Sex is a natural process. 13-17 year olds are capable of producing children, therefore their bodies are telling them to do exactly that. Of course people mature at different rates but the fact is that some teenagers are ready for sex and don't regret it. In modern society, pregnancy (and sex to a lesser extent) is pretty taboo before about 18-20, but I don't believe that makes it wrong. Everyone defines morality, happiness, and success in different ways. P.S. obviously no one needs pleasure to survive~
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 10:44 pm
My views on premarital sex.....(in the case of teens)
It is perfectly fine so long as the parents of the teenagers are not strongly judgmental towards the decision of their child. There also needs to be a good education of sex in schools so when teens decide to become sexually active they no of the consequences and the precautions that need to be taken.
My view on sex......(in the case of me)....Basically I think what I put before but I'm going to add somemore emotional type stuff.
Sex is not something that should be taking lightly, when you lose your virginity you will remember it for the rest of your life. So of course I think that you should wait till you find someone who you are in love with. Not saying the person needs to be your future spouse but I think they should at least be you partner at the time.
And some random information..... I'm 15 and to be honest I don't know what the legal age of sex in my country is, I think it may be 16..... I wouldn't be able to have sex until I have been with someone for at least 6 months (thats what I feel but looking at that number its not long) and I am about 16 or 17 and I would want it to be slightly planned so I could go on the pill.
________________________________________
Sorry if thats a bit long or off topic at times. I kinda just read the first post and started to type what I was thinking. There will probably be a lot of mistakes (spelling grammar word order) because I was typing fast and haven't read over it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:54 pm
.:Where there is love, distance doesn't matter....:Premarital sex is a quite a touchy subject. In the case on teens, I feel that it is their choice but they should be prepared. If they think their mature enough to make the decision, they should make sure they're mature enough to deal with consequences...not just the pregnancy issue but the emotional ones as well. You will remember, not only your first, but every time forever...don't regret one. Stop and think to yourself, "Is this the person I want to remember for the rest of my life?" Sex was meant to be special and, I believe, only to be shared with your soul mate. In the case of adults, again it's their choice but they should be aware of those who look up to them and are apt to follow their example. If you're alive, know that there is always someone younger than you, and they may be watching...you don't want the actions of those under you on your head. If one does make the choice, they should be wise about it and take the necessary precautions.
People should never confuse love and lust. This, I believe, is one of the main things wrong in the beliefs of today's society. The media says that it feels good, it must be 'love'...and in return the parents and schools stress how 'bad' it is, and this of course drives many teens to go into things in anger and spite toward their elders and they feel they are controlling them; when really, many parents don't realize what they're doing and don't know how else to deal with it.
I cannot actually speak for myself on this subject too well, other than my opinions and my friends' personal stories, because I am still a virgin myself and had not even had a first kiss...even though I'm out of high school and in college now, I still consider myself quite young and personally, still a little more towards the side of unready, even though I do love my boyfriend dearly. Of course there's not much pressure in that area because he lives 1,5oo miles away. But when he does move here, as he is planning on...it depends on the amount of time we both have had to think about and prepare for it. We both believe it is special for your first to be with the one you truly love. I don't know yet if he's meant to be my future spouse...but I do know that I truly love him and he loves me. Only time will tell the rest.
But this post is getting rather long so I shall quit my ramblings now. Back to the topic...it's not an issue of whether premarital sex is right or wrong...it's an issue of one's own heart. That is my view on it all. x3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 12:17 pm
Miss Almalexia Spiess Skits Miss Almalexia I don't see a problem with underage/teenage sex. If their body has hit puberty and they're sexually developed then why should we tell them they're not ready yet? The risk of STDs and pregnancy is always there and solutions (medication, abortion, adoption) are there too. Doing something because of peer or media pressure is always wrong, but listening to your body is certainly nothing bad. razz [...♥]It is wrong. You're anywhere from 13-16/17 years old you really don't need that kind of pleasure. You shouldn't want it either. Kids push growing up WAY to fast and end up regreting it in the end. Why is it wrong? Sex is a natural process. 13-17 year olds are capable of producing children, therefore their bodies are telling them to do exactly that. Of course people mature at different rates but the fact is that some teenagers are ready for sex and don't regret it. In modern society, pregnancy (and sex to a lesser extent) is pretty taboo before about 18-20, but I don't believe that makes it wrong. Everyone defines morality, happiness, and success in different ways. P.S. obviously no one needs pleasure to survive~ HELLO???
It's wrong, because children under 16 can't provide for their baby. They can't produce an income.
It's also wrong because if you're under 18, you can't own a home, a home to start your own family in. So basically you're burdening your parents and siblings by bringing another person into the family that THEY have to take care of.
That's why it's wrong.
talk2hand
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 12:25 pm
Why does NOBODY remember that teen pregnancy effects EVERYONE? Not JUST the teen mother and father, but their parents.
You're all saying, "Ohh, they have to be ready. They have to be mature enough for the concequences.." What about if they don't have an income? Guess who has to pay for all that s**t? The parents.
Teen sex is a selfish act. They don't seem to care about the concequences. They put this huge burden on their parents, and that, to me, is just patheticly terrible. They've already provided for you for 13-16 years, and for what? So you can go behind their back, have sex, get pregnant, and force them to take care of another child, that's not even "there" kid?
neutral stare
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 12:59 pm
AmErIcAnSyKo Miss Almalexia Spiess Skits Miss Almalexia I don't see a problem with underage/teenage sex. If their body has hit puberty and they're sexually developed then why should we tell them they're not ready yet? The risk of STDs and pregnancy is always there and solutions (medication, abortion, adoption) are there too. Doing something because of peer or media pressure is always wrong, but listening to your body is certainly nothing bad. razz [...♥]It is wrong. You're anywhere from 13-16/17 years old you really don't need that kind of pleasure. You shouldn't want it either. Kids push growing up WAY to fast and end up regreting it in the end. Why is it wrong? Sex is a natural process. 13-17 year olds are capable of producing children, therefore their bodies are telling them to do exactly that. Of course people mature at different rates but the fact is that some teenagers are ready for sex and don't regret it. In modern society, pregnancy (and sex to a lesser extent) is pretty taboo before about 18-20, but I don't believe that makes it wrong. Everyone defines morality, happiness, and success in different ways. P.S. obviously no one needs pleasure to survive~ HELLO???
It's wrong, because children under 16 can't provide for their baby. They can't produce an income.
It's also wrong because if you're under 18, you can't own a home, a home to start your own family in. So basically you're burdening your parents and siblings by bringing another person into the family that THEY have to take care of.
That's why it's wrong.
talk2hand that's a large problem, and there's also the matter of education. If the teenager stays at home to take care of their baby, then their education is probably going to be restricted. also, their kid is going to grow up and will need to go to school quicker than the teenager can provide. So their parents have to help for that too. Also, considering premarital sex is looked down upon in society, it will probably be something that will follow the kid for life. and in terms of lust starting around the ages of 13-16... the feelings may be there and the inside bodily functions may be ready, but sometimes the body itself is not ready. Just because a girl starts her period doesn't mean she's completely physically capable of having a baby safely. Her pelvis may not have fully developed to the right size yet, and trying to have a baby could either kill her, the baby, or both. STDs are also a huge problem. Even if they're going to be a problem anyway, wouldn't you want to avoid the risks as much as possible? sad
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 3:30 pm
Giganto post FTW?!AmErIcAnSyKo Miss Almalexia Spiess Skits Miss Almalexia I don't see a problem with underage/teenage sex. If their body has hit puberty and they're sexually developed then why should we tell them they're not ready yet? The risk of STDs and pregnancy is always there and solutions (medication, abortion, adoption) are there too. Doing something because of peer or media pressure is always wrong, but listening to your body is certainly nothing bad. razz [...♥]It is wrong. You're anywhere from 13-16/17 years old you really don't need that kind of pleasure. You shouldn't want it either. Kids push growing up WAY to fast and end up regreting it in the end. Why is it wrong? Sex is a natural process. 13-17 year olds are capable of producing children, therefore their bodies are telling them to do exactly that. Of course people mature at different rates but the fact is that some teenagers are ready for sex and don't regret it. In modern society, pregnancy (and sex to a lesser extent) is pretty taboo before about 18-20, but I don't believe that makes it wrong. Everyone defines morality, happiness, and success in different ways. P.S. obviously no one needs pleasure to survive~ HELLO???
It's wrong, because children under 16 can't provide for their baby. They can't produce an income.
It's also wrong because if you're under 18, you can't own a home, a home to start your own family in. So basically you're burdening your parents and siblings by bringing another person into the family that THEY have to take care of.
That's why it's wrong.
talk2hand Don't get all riled up smile Depending on the working age, some teenagers can provide for their baby, but you're right, most can't. Some parents are actually happy to care for a baby, and those who won't care for it have other options. They can convince the teenager to have an abortion or kick them out (or put the teenager up for adoption, but I don't think many parents think of that..). You might say that the pregnant girl is going to omg have a horrible life and regret it forever... well, maybe she really will be happier in her new life. My sister left home at 16 and says it was the best decision she ever made. (She wasn't pregnant but she did leave so she could have the freedom to have sex) Some people are happy not being rich/educated or traditionally "successful" but being able to do what they want with who they want. Hanami10 that's a large problem, and there's also the matter of education. If the teenager stays at home to take care of their baby, then their education is probably going to be restricted. also, their kid is going to grow up and will need to go to school quicker than the teenager can provide. So their parents have to help for that too. Also, considering premarital sex is looked down upon in society, it will probably be something that will follow the kid for life. and in terms of lust starting around the ages of 13-16... the feelings may be there and the inside bodily functions may be ready, but sometimes the body itself is not ready. Just because a girl starts her period doesn't mean she's completely physically capable of having a baby safely. Her pelvis may not have fully developed to the right size yet, and trying to have a baby could either kill her, the baby, or both. STDs are also a huge problem. Even if they're going to be a problem anyway, wouldn't you want to avoid the risks as much as possible? sad You are right about many teenagers getting the desire for sex before their pelvis/body are ready to carry a baby, but in most cases they will have a miscarriage. Sometimes they will get pretty sick, but I think most teenagers know pregnancy can go wrong and that's a risk involved. (Abortion is an option that, while dangerous, is much safer than pregnancy) The child might be made fun of because of their parent's age but I think that's a bad thing about the bullies not the child. Plus, culture changes. Maybe in the years to come it'll be okay. Obviously sex is worth the risk of STDs since the human population isn't even close to dying out. If anyone doesn't think so, they're welcome to abstain. If I haven't been clear to everyone- Obviously sex is dangerous & very serious, but I think everyone has the right to choose if they think it is worth it, even if they are a teenager. If you want to have sex and not have a baby, you can have an abortion. If you want to have sex and not get STDs, you can get yourself and your partner(s) tested (but basically it's a risk involved).
Sex doesn't have to be about love (though for you it might be), sex doesn't have to be about babies(though for you it might be). Sometimes sex really is just about pleasure and teenagers like pleasure too.Personally, I am a virgin and I like the idea of waiting until I'm in control of my life and have found someone I love. I just recognize that this isn't the only way to think.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 5:45 pm
Miss Almalexia Spiess Skits Miss Almalexia I don't see a problem with underage/teenage sex. If their body has hit puberty and they're sexually developed then why should we tell them they're not ready yet? The risk of STDs and pregnancy is always there and solutions (medication, abortion, adoption) are there too. Doing something because of peer or media pressure is always wrong, but listening to your body is certainly nothing bad. razz [...♥]It is wrong. You're anywhere from 13-16/17 years old you really don't need that kind of pleasure. You shouldn't want it either. Kids push growing up WAY to fast and end up regreting it in the end. Why is it wrong? Sex is a natural process. 13-17 year olds are capable of producing children, therefore their bodies are telling them to do exactly that. Of course people mature at different rates but the fact is that some teenagers are ready for sex and don't regret it. In modern society, pregnancy (and sex to a lesser extent) is pretty taboo before about 18-20, but I don't believe that makes it wrong. Everyone defines morality, happiness, and success in different ways. P.S. obviously no one needs pleasure to survive~ [...♥]I know kids who have "hooked up" and ended up wanting to kill themselves. Some of them have had kids, one got a STD. There is only one person who enjoyed it and having the baby. for the most part, the teens involved aren't mentally mature enough for that kind of responsibility. Even if you use contraception it doesn't always work. My mom used birth control pills and a condom when she concieved my little sister. It is wrong because most can't bear the burden of sex. Not only is it a burden on themselves, but on the people that have to care for the child, such as the parents and siblings.
Also the teen taking that responsibility has to deal with the nasty things that their peers pin on them. If a girl has sex and dissapears for about a year and comes back into school, kids will question, the guy will brag, and rumors will fly. This causes the poor girl to feel alone, rejected, and emotionally damaged.
Basically it is a bad thing because MOST teens can't handle that kind of responsibilty.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|