|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 5:45 am
Trumpster You got question 2 right with mewtwo but castform is right too. question three is a very hard one I threw in so I'd be impressed if anyone got it right. i was thinking like enusaur or something maybe cause sunlight and shiny and that's the stupidist reasoning i could come up with 3nodding lol
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 5:48 am
No, the question is actually to do with the shiny colouring of a pokemon. when it has it's alternate colour set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 5:49 am
Trumpster No, the question is actually to do with the shiny colouring of a pokemon. when it has it's alternate colour set. hmm i'll look it up *nods* hmm does it like give it more strenght or a special characteristic like camoflage (spelled horribly wrong sorry><)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 5:59 am
The clue is actually in the question. "by the laws of science." meaning there is a scientifice reason why the shiny version should be more powerful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 3:04 pm
Well.. For question 1, I'm guessing the answer is machop. As for 3... Well, I'm working on it. Ooh! Got it!
By the laws of science, blue fire is hotter than red fire, thus an alternately coloured ponyta/rapidash would be stronger. Correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 3:45 pm
Phoenix_Soul Well.. For question 1, I'm guessing the answer is machop. As for 3... Well, I'm working on it. Ooh! Got it! By the laws of science, blue fire is hotter than red fire, thus an alternately coloured ponyta/rapidash would be stronger. Correct? WOAH!!! i shoulda thought of that!!! *hits myself* xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 5:35 pm
Phoenix_Soul Well.. For question 1, I'm guessing the answer is machop. As for 3... Well, I'm working on it. Ooh! Got it! By the laws of science, blue fire is hotter than red fire, thus an alternately coloured ponyta/rapidash would be stronger. Correct? Smart one... Incase she's wrong on #1, I guess Togetic cuz it has wings and it evolves when it loves you. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 12:29 am
Blue fire isn't hotter, it just means a different reaction is going on
And looks way more awesome
The shiney form could talk about light, in which case maybe a dark pokemon due to it not absorbing any?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 1:09 am
Okay... Well, I know blue fire still burns hotter. I learned that in high school... But if that's not what you're looking for, then I'm out of ideas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 2:06 am
Phoenix_Soul Okay... Well, I know blue fire still burns hotter. I learned that in high school... But if that's not what you're looking for, then I'm out of ideas. No Blue fire CAN burn hotter Fire does not have a specific temperature at which is burns a specific colour It depends on the subshells and orbitals filled by the valence electrons of the substance undergoing oxidation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 6:05 am
Zacius Phoenix_Soul Okay... Well, I know blue fire still burns hotter. I learned that in high school... But if that's not what you're looking for, then I'm out of ideas. No Blue fire CAN burn hotter Fire does not have a specific temperature at which is burns a specific colour It depends on the subshells and orbitals filled by the valence electrons of the substance undergoing oxidation What science book did you get that out of? (And when was it copyrighted?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 6:49 am
Ponyta is right for question 3 but nobody has guessed question 1 right yet.
Also I always thought that blue fire was hotter and I still think that, especially when seeing my grade in science.
This is mainly proved by Bunsen Burners. When you open the nozzle to let more air, and thus more fuel, into the pipe the flame then burns blue and much hotter . also there is a scale for natural flame colours and blue is one of the hottest.
it is also true that certain chemicals or substances being burnt also change the colour of the flame and that has nothing to do with heat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:15 pm
Woo. I have no idea what the answer to question 1 is.. Sounds like a fighting type.. Wait... Is it Heracross?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 5:52 pm
is the answer to #1 phanpy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 6:55 pm
ZeekSlider What science book did you get that out of? (And when was it copyrighted?) Chemical connections 2 2nd edition First edition '92 Second edition '00 Published by Jacaranda
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
