|
|
| Sick of... |
| Pro-choicers in general. |
|
17% |
[ 13 ] |
| Pro-choice arguments. |
|
19% |
[ 15 ] |
| Pro-choice ideology. |
|
25% |
[ 19 ] |
| life in general. |
|
15% |
[ 12 ] |
| no respect whatsoever. |
|
22% |
[ 17 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:57 pm
Ebony the Peacian Vampire I'm sick of pro-choicers making fun of us in their signatures.
I'm sick of pro-choicers putting words in our mouths.
I'm sick of the amount of disrespect coming from their crude remarks about us.
I'm sick of a select group of pro-choicers (not all of them, only about two or three) who think that by acting tough and bitchy to those who think differently than they do they're impressing other people, and looking "cool" because of it.
And that's all I have right now. -Applaud-
:'D
Oh my.
It's like you've known me all my life.
...
STALKER!
x3
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:39 pm
*sweeping bow*
^ o ^
I just learn things about people easily. *chuckles*
*hugs*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:27 pm
Pyrotechnic Oracle I'm not understanding part of your post. "Uhh, sorry? I have the same opinion about sperm and eggs; random chromosomes, by themselves, cannot develop into a complex organism. And, even while they're combined and able to become one, or, Hell, even are already one, cannot be killed and classified as a murder victem unless it's human." Are you saying that the combined sperm and egg of a female and male human, is not a newly developed human being in of its self? When they combine they can develop into a complex organism, when they are seperate they can't. I believe that is what she is getting at; The sperm and egg are "random" DNA, they aren't complete, and, left alone, they won't become anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 8:46 pm
Okay. I have a slight politicle rant. You knwo what I hate? I hate it when some one claims to be enlightened about polotics because they "studdied" politics and claims you are a moron if your not of "this" view. I find that, comonly, these are the types who are what their momy and daddy was and only did deeper research into that side with out doing much research into the other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:35 pm
Pyrotechnic Oracle Okay. I have a slight politicle rant. You knwo what I hate? I hate it when some one claims to be enlightened about polotics because they "studdied" politics and claims you are a moron if your not of "this" view. I find that, comonly, these are the types who are what their momy and daddy was and only did deeper research into that side with out doing much research into the other
My friend JP is a complete seperatist and I'm a federalist, but I mean there's not anamosity between us. We tease each other about it (like he tells me I'd be better if I was french. XD) but just because he went to university for a year and I haven't as of yet doesn't mean he looks down on me. He just appreciates the fact that he and I have a similar interest and so he makes a point to discuss politics with me. Which I absolutely love because he's like the only friend of mine who will actually do that. ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 9:23 pm
Beware the Jabberwock Pyrotechnic Oracle Okay. I have a slight politicle rant. You knwo what I hate? I hate it when some one claims to be enlightened about polotics because they "studdied" politics and claims you are a moron if your not of "this" view. I find that, comonly, these are the types who are what their momy and daddy was and only did deeper research into that side with out doing much research into the other
My friend JP is a complete seperatist and I'm a federalist, but I mean there's not anamosity between us. We tease each other about it (like he tells me I'd be better if I was french. XD) but just because he went to university for a year and I haven't as of yet doesn't mean he looks down on me. He just appreciates the fact that he and I have a similar interest and so he makes a point to discuss politics with me. Which I absolutely love because he's like the only friend of mine who will actually do that. ^_^I was about to make a smilier statement. I hate the ED for two reasons. One, its a bunch of teenagers who think they know ever thing, along with abunch of others who have been to college and think they know every thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 8:39 am
Pyrotechnic Oracle I hate the ED for two reasons. One, its a bunch of teenagers who think they know ever thing, along with abunch of others who have been to college and think they know every thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:52 am
Pyrotechnic Oracle ED=angsty teens who think they know everything and angsty people who think they know every thing because they've been to colloge [quote="Pyrotechnic Oracle"]ED=angsty teens who think they know everything and angsty people who think they know every thing because they've been to colloge[/quote]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 7:56 am
Kukushka Speaking of ad hominems, if that Seth guy tells me to "read the post before answering" one more freakin' time, Imma gonna eat him. Especially when that's the ONLY answer he has to my argument and it's oh-so-obvious that he's been proved wrong. My first reference in the pro-choice guild. I don't know whether to be proud or annoyed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:52 am
Did they prove you wrong with facts, or think they proved you wrong using their opinoins?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:36 am
Both, probably.
There're some choice-oriented stats, just like there're some life-oriented stats.
Not all of them are biased, but some of the extreme statistics on both sides make me think that the person who put the site together was stoned out of their mind at the time.
*sigh* No one knows what to believe anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 2:27 am
Pyrotechnic Oracle Did they prove you wrong with facts, or think they proved you wrong using their opinoins? That's the thing, she created a huge argument based on a misread post. 3 times. She didn't actually prove me wrong, because she was making points on a miread post, I drew attention to this and she told me Kukushka You know, eventually you are going to have to come up with real arguments instead of relying on slandering, scare tactics, and use of language that either demeans the other side or elevates your own. EDIT: Just clarifying, my "scare tactic" was me stating that most abortions were merely for personal convenience. Some responses were : Yes, because it's wrong for a woman to want to die giving birth. When I called THAT a scare tactic I was chewed out for about 3 pages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 2:37 am
We see the hypocracy once more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:57 pm
but... is it not true that most abortion is for convenience? a few thousand or so per year for serious health risks, that's fine. a few thousand for rape victims, acceptable. but 1.4 million. per year. i have spoken with choicers who are so beguiled that they honestly believe that there haven't even been 1 million in the history of abortion. 1.4 million PER YEAR is 14 hunderd thousand. it is one thousand children, one hundred forty times over. the sheer amount, the sheer numbers are beyond disgusting, they are unbearable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:07 pm
divineseraph but... is it not true that most abortion is for convenience? a few thousand or so per year for serious health risks, that's fine. a few thousand for rape victims, acceptable. but 1.4 million. per year. i have spoken with choicers who are so beguiled that they honestly believe that there haven't even been 1 million in the history of abortion. 1.4 million PER YEAR is 14 hunderd thousand. it is one thousand children, one hundred forty times over. the sheer amount, the sheer numbers are beyond disgusting, they are unbearable. Yet it's all denied, seconded, agreed with and signed in triplicate the second it reachs the abortion debate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
