|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:12 pm
*rolls her eyes* Mr Kem, you do know that parody is protected under law. An please don't say "Not on Bismol!" because we're not on Bismol.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:13 pm
Tenzil Kem Two clients who want the same thing? ::rubs hands together:: Dare I say...Class Action Suit?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:14 pm
Ricochet Rita We'll get you where you need to be. Let me see what i can come up with. ~opens a portal~ I'll be around. ~steps through and vanishes~
Bye Scary Lady Who is Going to Teach Me Stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:20 pm
Miss, uh, Green, I certainly wouldn't argue that Parody per se is not covered by law. But are these...tracts...parody in nature? Or are they...well...pornography that use well-known personalities to peddle their wares?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:24 pm
Tenzil Kem Miss, uh, Green, I certainly wouldn't argue that Parody per se is not covered by law. But are these...tracts...parody in nature? Or are they...well...pornography that use well-known personalities to peddle their wares?
*packs up her table*
Have a good evening all. Good luck on your book, Mr. Boy.
*walks out*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:28 pm
Oh no.. not more COURT!
scream gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:29 pm
Ms Clarice Ferguson Oh no.. not more COURT! scream gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:31 pm
A dirty, misogynist old man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:32 pm
Well, I mean, it seems rather simple to me. If a person doesn't mind having their likeness used in these writings, no problem. They have given implied permission by not requesting that they be removed.
But if a person DOES mind, and expressly requests that fictions bearing their likeness that are not released with their approval are removed, then, legally, they should have to be removed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:34 pm
I mean, as much as I would LOVE to go to trial over it all, I heard someone attacked the statue of Justice over there. I'm a little worried.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:35 pm
Tenzil Kem I mean, as much as I would LOVE to go to trial over it all, I heard someone attacked the statue of Justice over there. I'm a little worried.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:37 pm
Yes, but I generally try to keep my dazzling superheroic antics out of the courtroom. I can't tell you how many times I've been reprimanded for 'showboating.'
If I'm in the middle of a cross-examination, and some screwy Louie comes in waving a spear, I'd have to abandon the trial and take care of the spear-and the judges just HATE that for some reason. I'd prefer a trial to just BE a trial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:39 pm
Tenzil Kem Yes, but I generally try to keep my dazzling superheroic antics out of the courtroom. I can't tell you how many times I've been reprimanded for 'showboating.' If I'm in the middle of a cross-examination, and some screwy Louie comes in waving a spear, I'd have to abandon the trial and take care of the spear-and the judges just HATE that for some reason. I'd prefer a trial to just BE a trial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:42 pm
I appreciate the sentiment, but it's my clients who should be protected, not myself. I am but a conduit in the closed-circuit of justice!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
