Welcome to Gaia! ::

The Guild for Believers of Salvation through Christ

Back to Guilds

 

 

Reply The Guild for Believers of Salvation through Christ
x Goto Page: [] [<<] [<] 1 2 3 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 20 21 22 23 [>] [>>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Se Ga Takai
Crew

PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:07 pm


Aight, little miss pain-in-the-a** here, doesn't understand teh quality of debate in proper thread. If anyone, and I mean anyone wants to debate something about me or my beliefs, you can either get teh guts to make your views public, or you can shut up. Because as of Now, my PMs are locked to all but those on my friendslist, and you can thank her or her boyfriend for this.
bluepanther_05
Se Ga Takai
bluepanther_05
I am slightly offended by your signature. You say that you are a Christian, but how can you be if you believe in gay marriages? I am a Christian myself and I would never want to make other Christians think that that was ok. God created us to like people of the opposite sex.
Apologies, but I don't care to debate against ignorence. If you truly feel the need, read my previous journal entry, here, and then PM me again. Else, leave me alone.

Besides teh point, I am not the only Christian on Gaia to believe that, there are countless others.


Your Journal does't explain anything explain anything besides that you don't care about what the bible says and you are just going by the laws.
Quote:
Point that people don't understand, is that teh Bibles point of View on this subject doesn't matter.

If you really were a Christian you would care about what it says. I know that there are others that claim that they are Christians that believe the same thing that you do, but I haven't found them yet and if I do I will defend the one that died for me and tell them of their false advertising as well.

1) okay, by all defenitions, you are ignorant, so I will forgive this for teh moment. But just so you know, this is judging me, and I never judged you. I have my beliefs. Some of those beliefs go along the lines that constantly shoving my beliefs down others throats will not make quick friends, much less helping anyone see teh reason behind my beliefs.

For an example, you threw multiple Ad-Hominum attacks my way, claiming that since I didn't act like you, I'm obviously either (a) a bad Christian or (b) not Chrstian at all. Amazing. My Bad, I misread that text "Hate thy Neighbour", I thought it said something about "Love". Forgive Me.

2) Just because I support the idea that two people who love each other have every right as I do to spend their life in Happiness with each other, does not mean that I am encouraging it. honestly, it doesn't really affect me. if two Men are in teh Apartment next to me doing anything from contentedly smiling and holding hands, to engaging themseleves in sexual acts of near heroic feat, it really doesn't affect me any more than it would if it were a heterosexual couple. Really, it doesn't. Do they realise that many Christians who choose to straddle a particular Moral High Horse are offended that they choose to engage in a pleasurable activity that is frowned upon by said Activity? Probably, most Homosexuals get that information shoved down there throat on a daily basis, much like you did today. Do your Beliefs affect them? Absolutely. People like you are very annoying.

3) My Journal very clearly explained the probability and legality of banning Gay Marriage. It is a violation of Human Rights, and teh Seperation of Church and State. Unless there is a viable explanation outside of religion as to why Gay Marriage should be disallowed, then by all means, ban it. But there isn't. So don't.

4) You will defend teh name of Christ by harassing anyone and everyone you can find that disagrees with you? *Claps* Typical Ignorant Pride. You feel so sure that you have all teh Truths, and everything that is right. Paul himself, who knew Christ and wrote Gospel, didn't have a fraction of teh Pride you do. Learn from him.

5) You claim I am falsely Advertising? You are advertising that Christianity is nothing more than Control and Hate. You have issues with someone who is different from you, believes differently than you, than they are obviously a bad Christian. Because you're perfect.

-or-

Try this. You just may be imperfect! yup, just as screwed up as the rest of us. Just as ignorant, as well. You were born knowing -Nothing-, and you had time to learn. So stop assuming, and learn. Provide sources, provide verse, and wait for feedback. Don't assume for one moment that you are right. If you have this great and undeniably awesome truth, provide it, show what we missed, but the moment you pull AdHominums, you make enemies, not students.
PostPosted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:48 pm


Yikes. Is that thinger going to get punted from the guild?

Wait, how is your signature offensive? I get a surprisingly low amount of flames, having my own face in a Sigil of Baphomet, and being the Captain of the Church of Satan guild, as well as Vice Captain of Siaion de Mahorela, and a member of Dance With the Devil. >.> You'd think the "fundies" would eat that right up.

Guess not.

PirateEire


Taralanthalasa

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:56 pm


This going to be a long one, So I may break it down into two or three posts.

Frist I would like to say that I am all for gay marriage. Secondly I would like to point out that I am christian. And last but most certianly not least, I would like to point out that I am bi.
Find me a verse in the Bible that states that I am condemned to hell for my sin even if I love and follow God to the best of my ability. I bet you'll have problems with that one.

ShadowCat495

We can't listen to the constitution about everything. We should not let them sin, even if it's going against the constitution. Sinning is a lot worse then segregating. If gay people should be allowed to get married, then shouldn't two or three year olds? They're people too. This is a grand scale thing. Think about the our lives when we die.

We were given free will from God himself. You can't take that away from us. And what about "Do not pervert justice; do not show partialitly to the poor or favoraitism to the great, but judge your neighbor fairly"- Leviticus 19:15. And what about "Love thy neighbor as thyself"? How would you feel if someone denied you the right to marry? Say the majority of people are homosexual, and the minority heterosexuals fighting for heterosexual marriage. People are constantly letting it known that they don't believe heterosexual marriage should be allowed because it goes against what they believe to be "moral" or right. What would you think then?
Must I remind you that everyone sins?

ShadowCat495
If we were to give everyone the free will to sin, and didn't stop them from sinning, there would be no law enforcement, criminals would roam free. Why should we we allow gay marriage if people aren't allowed to be naked in public? {btw, no trying to argue, if I'm wrong, then i want to be corrected in all points}


We didn't give people the free will to sin, God did, but Laws are made to protect people from harm, not from ignorance. They're are Nude beaches you know, those are public to anyone who goes there. And in my area, one of our public pools as a date each month were people can go skini dipping. Again, public to anyone who attends such things.

Xindaris
Quote:
Who exactly does homosexuality harm, and who are you to dictate the love lives of other human beings?

hoo boy, that's a really obvious question. Who does it harm?
1.Those involved are more likely to be infected with STDs, and no that isn't it, that's all I can think of right now.
2.Those around them are given the implication that it is right, when it is not.

ok 1. thats BS, someone who is educated on risks and such of a**l sex would probably use protection i.e a condom and some lube to prevent the condom from breaking. Might I add that heterosexaul couple's can also participate in a**l sex. I have a female friend that has recived a**l sex from her ex boyfriend. So don't feed people that crap.
and 2. Whats it matter to you? if you believe strongly enough that being homosexual is wrong, then their getting married isn't going to affect you, why? because to you it's not right. But because it's not right to you doesn't mean it's not right to us. God loves all his childern uncondionally which is why he gave his only son to die for our sins. So all may have the chance to accend into heaven as long as they have God in their lives at the time of death.
PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:57 pm


Now for the big quotes:

i like burnination
Se Ga Takai
i like burnination
Se Ga Takai
i like burnination

i can't believe you would even consider moral relativism ...
moral relativism is complete BS. utter and complete nonsense, claptrap, garbage, and any other name one could think of to describe an idea that destroys society AND weakens Christians. i think Jesus said "I am the TRUTH". just saying. He seemed pretty important. :]

also, relativism simply doesn't work. if there's no absolute truth or that everyone has a different standard, who are you to tell me anything? how can you say that relativism is true? stop imposing your beliefs on me.
Person A believes something is wrong, Person B believes it is fine. What do you call that?

someone is right and the other is wrong. plain and simple. they can't both be right otherwise that wouldn't make sense.
and to them, they are right, you are wrong.

they think they're right, but that doesn't actually make either of them right.
but one of them must be right and the other wrong. truth is not dependant upon humans, but instead upon a much higher Being who is the source of truth.

don't try and take God out of the picture when dealing with truth.

So... are you saying people can't have different oppinions? Cause that's how that works. As was said "Person A believes something is wrong, Person B believes it is fine" It's called oppinion, neither are right nor wrong. At least not that we can judge anyway. "Judge and be judged" as the saying goes, and "do unto others as you would have done unto you". You have your set of morals, things you believe to be right, and I have mine. They could be completely different because we are from two different places, or have a different religion or attend a different church, or simply have a different ethnic background all together. Your set of morals depend on how you've been brought up, what you have been tought. It has EVERYTHING to do with this topic, as many of the points are valid.
Quote:
but one of them must be right and the other wrong. truth is not dependant upon humans, but instead upon a much higher Being who is the source of truth.

So who are you to say someone or something is wrong then?
Lets leave the judging thing to God on judgement day, shall we?
Quote:
who are you to tell me anything? how can you say that relativism is true? stop imposing your beliefs on me.

humm... sounds familair, don't it? you don't like poeple pushing things on you, so why push things on other people? Pushing Bible verses in peoples faces about homosexual marriage is pushing your beliefs on people who may not understand, believe in, or welcome Christianity. Therfore its invailid to argue based on scripture, because not everyone believes in the same thing.

Taralanthalasa


Se Ga Takai
Crew

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:14 pm


You know, I have a slight feeling I could get along with you. At first I had thought that I hadn't explained clearly enough, but if someone else gets it...hmm.

Glad to have ye around ^_^
PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:34 pm


Well said, Taralanthalasa. (Gads, that's a long name if I've ever heard one.)

Reverse psychology confuses some in this guild however, so I'm not sure that example with the majority of homosexual couples supressing the minority of heterosexual ones will get through. Have you heard of the heterosexual questionnaire by Martin Rochlin? It's basically a questionnaire of questions often asked to homosexuals, but in the reverse. I posted it once in this guild and got a few strange reactions. Flew over the 2 or 3 peoples' heads who read it (and for some reason took the liberty to answer each and every single one of the questions.) They then denied that homosexuals have ever been asked any of the questions in reverse. I have been asked most of them... in regards to homosexuality. Still, denied.

My girlfriend took a class on homosexuality. She said she was taught that homophobia, not unlike racism, is nearly impossible to talk someone out of, becuase when convenient, a homophobe or a racist, or sexist, or anything to that effect with feign ignorance. (Maybe it's not feigning though...) In a nutshell, closed minds are hard to open... almost impossible.

PirateEire


i like burnination

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:10 am


Taralanthalasa
i like burnination

they think they're right, but that doesn't actually make either of them right.
but one of them must be right and the other wrong. truth is not dependant upon humans, but instead upon a much higher Being who is the source of truth.

don't try and take God out of the picture when dealing with truth.

So... are you saying people can't have different oppinions? Cause that's how that works. As was said "Person A believes something is wrong, Person B believes it is fine" It's called oppinion, neither are right nor wrong. At least not that we can judge anyway. "Judge and be judged" as the saying goes, and "do unto others as you would have done unto you". You haveyour set of morals, things you believe to be right, and I have mine. They could be completely different because we are from two different places, or have a different religion or attend a different church, or simply have a different ethnic background all together. Your set of morals depend on how you've been brought up, what you have been tought. It has EVERYTHING to do with this topic, as many of the points are valid.

people can have different opinions, yes. however, one's opinion does not define the thing they have the opinion about. if i saw a Jackson Pollock painting and said it was horrible and Pollock a madman, that's my opinion. now i won't go into art discussion and theory, but Pollock was quite artistic no matter what his paintings looked like because he was expressing himself in a new way (FYI, i'm half clueless about art XD). so the point is that no matter what one's opinion might be about a certain thing, it is going to be either right or wrong because that thing does have a correct property that some are going to agree with and others disagree with. i mean, if i said that water had fifty parts carbon and twelve parts oxygen and no hydrogen and believed steadfastly in that in the face of all scientific evidence, i would be wrong no matter how zealously or strongly i felt about my highly erroneous opinion. now there are things that are simply a matter of taste, but one can't pick and choose one's morals like they were at a buffet, and morals are not served only to certain people. Romans 2:12-16 asserts this. a scenario of cannibals does not work, i think. it could be very well that they are simply considerably decieved by the Devil into putting aside their guilt and thinking cannibalism to be just fine or service to a deity of sorts. also, the part that you are talking about "judge and be judged" is a mistranslation of Romans 2:3, and the context can hardly apply to any moral Christian. it is talking of hypocrites who look only upon the faults of others and pay no attention to their own. "But by your hard and impenitent heart you are storing wrath up for yourself on the day of judgement." (Romans 2:5). so the only way relativism can work is if you take God and the Bible out of the picture completely.
Taralanthalasa
Me
but one of them must be right and the other wrong. truth is not dependant upon humans, but instead upon a much higher Being who is the source of truth.

So who are you to say someone or something is wrong then?
Lets leave the judging thing to God on judgement day, shall we?

of course. because the Ten Commandements doesn't mean anything.
and telling someone something is wrong =/= judging.
i mean, good gravy. that's like having the knowledge to perform CPR, and yet letting one's friend die of asphyxiation because one wants to wait for the paramedics.

isn't that the opposite of the Great Commission?
Taralanthalasa
Me
who are you to tell me anything? how can you say that relativism is true? stop imposing your beliefs on me.
humm... sounds familair, don't it? you don't like poeple pushing things on you, so why push things on other people? Pushing Bible verses in peoples faces about homosexual marriage is pushing your beliefs on people who may not understand, believe in, or welcome Christianity. Therfore its invailid to argue based on scripture, because not everyone believes in the same thing.

of course it sounds familiar. it's called sarcasm. i used a common cry of relativists to denounce relativism.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:29 am


i like burnination

Taralanthalasa
Me
but one of them must be right and the other wrong. truth is not dependant upon humans, but instead upon a much higher Being who is the source of truth.

So who are you to say someone or something is wrong then?
Lets leave the judging thing to God on judgement day, shall we?

of course. because the Ten Commandements doesn't mean anything.
That's not the debate here. Where in teh Ten Commandments does it declare Homosexuality as wrong?
i like burnination

and telling someone something is wrong =/= judging.
might want to look up the defenition for judging, then. The defenitions match up pretty well.
i like burnination

Taralanthalasa
Me
who are you to tell me anything? how can you say that relativism is true? stop imposing your beliefs on me.
humm... sounds familair, don't it? you don't like poeple pushing things on you, so why push things on other people? Pushing Bible verses in peoples faces about homosexual marriage is pushing your beliefs on people who may not understand, believe in, or welcome Christianity. Therfore its invailid to argue based on scripture, because not everyone believes in the same thing.

of course it sounds familiar. it's called sarcasm. i used a common cry of relativists to denounce relativism.
Some people don't like certain words of teh English LAnguage. Some people don't like Meat. Some people just don't like Potatoes. Should they all be allowed to be different, or are we just going to disallow Meat and Potatoes, kinda like we disallow certain words?

Se Ga Takai
Crew


DemigoddessHalfdemon

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:32 am


Burnination. You say that there is an absolute right and wrong. That morality is not relative. So I ask you: Who decides what is right, and what is wrong?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:57 pm


i like burnination
so the point is that no matter what one's opinion might be about a certain thing, it is going to be either right or wrong because that thing does have a correct property that some are going to agree with and others disagree with. i mean, if i said that water had fifty parts carbon and twelve parts oxygen and no hydrogen and believed steadfastly in that in the face of all scientific evidence, i would be wrong no matter how zealously or strongly i felt about my highly erroneous opinion.
Opinion cannot be fact, and fact cannot be opinion. No one can have an opinion on what elements are in water, because there is already proven fact of what is in it. The only thing that can come after that is a false conclusion, not an opinion. (And because science is so silly, an even more accurate fact...) If you look at the artist in your example's paintings, you can say it is good, or it is bad. Is there one true answer to whether or not it is good or bad? No. It's subject to opinion. Again, no opinion can be fact. You can say he painted in acryllic, and that will not be an opinion. It is a fact (whether it is true or not.) Don't know what your primary schools teach you in the US, but some of my earliest lessons in primary school were to distinguish facts from opinions. Morality is construed of opinions, and it is therefore subjective. There are no absolutes in morality.

i like burnination
now there are things that are simply a matter of taste, but one can't pick and choose one's morals like they were at a buffet, and morals are not served only to certain people. Romans 2:12-16 asserts this. a scenario of cannibals does not work, i think. it could be very well that they are simply considerably decieved by the Devil into putting aside their guilt and thinking cannibalism to be just fine or service to a deity of sorts. also, the part that you are talking about "judge and be judged" is a mistranslation of Romans 2:3, and the context can hardly apply to any moral Christian. it is talking of hypocrites who look only upon the faults of others and pay no attention to their own. "But by your hard and impenitent heart you are storing wrath up for yourself on the day of judgement." (Romans 2:5). so the only way relativism can work is if you take God and the Bible out of the picture completely.
Is it not counter productive to affirm that your own morals are correct and others are faulty using the dogma that supports your morals as what you take to be fact? Welcome to a world where a majority of people are not Christian. Your morality does not set the grounds for anyone else's. Your religion should not dictate what is right and what is wrong.

i like burnination
Taralanthalasa
Me
but one of them must be right and the other wrong. truth is not dependant upon humans, but instead upon a much higher Being who is the source of truth.

So who are you to say someone or something is wrong then?
Lets leave the judging thing to God on judgement day, shall we?

of course. because the Ten Commandements doesn't mean anything.
and telling someone something is wrong =/= judging.
i mean, good gravy. that's like having the knowledge to perform CPR, and yet letting one's friend die of asphyxiation because one wants to wait for the paramedics.
I'm sorry but you use the absolute most inane and unrelated analogies I do believe I have ever heard. In regards to the topic of this thread, you are saying that it is your duty to judge in God's place (though your own scriptures teach against doing such)--It is your duty to tell homosexuals not to marry because you think they'll go to Hell for it. You use an example that compares homosexual acts to asphyxiation, and going to Hell to death. You compare harassing/supressing to helping/saving one's life. Death is a certainty... Hell is not. Death can be proven, but Hell has yet to be. There are very, very, very few people who do not believe in death.

In regards to homosexuality--If you let homosexuality continue, it will not result in the death of anyone. You believe that their souls will be condemned to Hell if I am not mistaken, but not every citizen of this country believes in such a place. It may or may not be real. You may think it is, but some believe it is not. It is not sound grounds for laws. You cannot make a law to protect people from Hell if Hell is not a proven threat. Especially in a non-religious government.

I normally don't do this because I hate dictionary.com and it's inferiority to any encyclopedia, but:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/judging

PirateEire


Taralanthalasa

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:58 pm


Se Ga Takai
i like burnination

Taralanthalasa
Me
but one of them must be right and the other wrong. truth is not dependant upon humans, but instead upon a much higher Being who is the source of truth.

So who are you to say someone or something is wrong then?
Lets leave the judging thing to God on judgement day, shall we?

of course. because the Ten Commandements doesn't mean anything.
That's not the debate here. Where in teh Ten Commandments does it declare Homosexuality as wrong?

Oo, Oo! I know! *raises hand* no where. Why? cause heres the Ten Commandments:
1. You shall have no other gods before me
2. You shall not make for yourself an idol, or any likeness of what is in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the water under the earth.
3. You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain, for the LORD will not leave him unpunished who takes His name in vain.
4. Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.
5. Honour your father and your mother, that your days may be prolonged in the land which the LORD your God gives you.
6. You shall not muder.
7. You shall not commit adultery.
8. You shall not steal.
9. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
10. You shall not convet your neighbor's house; you shall not convet your neighbor's wife or his male servant or his female servant or his ox or his donkey or anything that belongs to your neighbor.

Se Ga Takai
i like burnination

and telling someone something is wrong =/= judging.
might want to look up the defenition for judging, then. The defenitions match up pretty well.

Yup. I'll help on this one too.
From Webster's Dictionary:
Judge- 1. Hear and decide cases in a law court.
2. determine the winner. 3. appraise or criticize. 4. think; suppose

from dictionary.com:
1. To form an opinion or estimation of after careful consideration: judge heights; judging character.

2. a) Law. To hear and decide on in a court of law; try: judge a case.
b) Obsolete. To pass sentence on; condemn.
c) To act as one appointed to decide the winners of: judge an essay contest.
3. To determine or declare after consideration or deliberation.
4. Informal. To have as an opinion or assumption; suppose: I judge you're right.
5. Bible. To govern; rule. Used of an ancient Israelite leader.

theres also: "One who makes estimates as to worth, quality, or fitness: a good judge of used cars; a poor judge of character." also taken from dictionary.com... just to make sure I got them all.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:15 pm


PirateEire
i like burnination
Taralanthalasa
Me
but one of them must be right and the other wrong. truth is not dependant upon humans, but instead upon a much higher Being who is the source of truth.

So who are you to say someone or something is wrong then?
Lets leave the judging thing to God on judgement day, shall we?

of course. because the Ten Commandements doesn't mean anything.
and telling someone something is wrong =/= judging.
i mean, good gravy. that's like having the knowledge to perform CPR, and yet letting one's friend die of asphyxiation because one wants to wait for the paramedics.
I'm sorry but you use the absolute most inane and unrelated analogies I do believe I have ever heard. In regards to the topic of this thread, you are saying that it is your duty to judge in God's place (though your own scriptures teach against doing such)--It is your duty to tell homosexuals not to marry because you think they'll go to Hell for it. You use an example that compares homosexual acts to asphyxiation, and going to Hell to death. You compare harassing/supressing to helping/saving one's life. Death is a certainty... Hell is not. Death can be proven, but Hell has yet to be. There are very, very, very few people who do not believe in death.

In regards to homosexuality--If you let homosexuality continue, it will not result in the death of anyone. You believe that their souls will be condemned to Hell if I am not mistaken, but not every citizen of this country believes in such a place. It may or may not be real. You may think it is, but some believe it is not. It is not sound grounds for laws. You cannot make a law to protect people from Hell if Hell is not a proven threat. Especially in a non-religious government.

I normally don't do this because I hate dictionary.com and it's inferiority to any encyclopedia, but:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/judging

wow... we just thought of the same thing(dictionary.com)... and posted it around the same time... I think xd

Taralanthalasa


Territorial Art

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:51 pm


I didnt have time to read through all the past posts, but heres what I believe;

God accepts all people into his heart. Love is stronger than any bond. Its better for a gay couple that loves one another to be married than a male and female who commit adultry and sins with different people to be married.God loves all of his creations, and he should accept to love them too. Whether its right or wrong.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:55 am


On Moral Relativism (since we have crashed and burned into off topic anywhoo): I actually agree with Burny.

Yes, there is such a thing as an opinion.

But God sets what is right and what is wrong.
The law is there, even if we don't know it yet in whole.

to go back to the "Opinion" that water is 2 parts oxygen and 1 part hydrogen--before we could prove that water was made up of these chemicals, I'm sure there were different opinions. Regardless of what the other opinions were, the person with an opinion of h2o was CORRECT.

I try to think of moralism in the same way. If everything else has an absolute (you know, like death and taxes), I don't see how it makes sense to say that morals are any different. It's the same as belief in God. I say there is a God, someone else says there isn't. They are different opinions, yes, but just because it isn't "proven" doesn't change the fact that one of us is most definitely right, while the other is most definitely wrong.

so, argue relativism all you want, but I believe in ONE Truth (and Way and Life, actually)--not billions.

Rowena Marion
Captain


Taralanthalasa

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 4:26 am


Rowena Marion
On Moral Relativism (since we have crashed and burned into off topic anywhoo): I actually agree with Burny.

Yes, there is such a thing as an opinion.

But God sets what is right and what is wrong.
The law is there, even if we don't know it yet in whole.

to go back to the "Opinion" that water is 2 parts oxygen and 1 part hydrogen--before we could prove that water was made up of these chemicals, I'm sure there were different opinions. Regardless of what the other opinions were, the person with an opinion of h2o was CORRECT.

I try to think of moralism in the same way. If everything else has an absolute (you know, like death and taxes), I don't see how it makes sense to say that morals are any different. It's the same as belief in God. I say there is a God, someone else says there isn't. They are different opinions, yes, but just because it isn't "proven" doesn't change the fact that one of us is most definitely right, while the other is most definitely wrong.

so, argue relativism all you want, but I believe in ONE Truth (and Way and Life, actually)--not billions.

You don't have to believe in billions to except that others don't live the same way you do. You may see someone wearing a dress that covers their whole body, and wears a scarf like thing around their head, while someone else wears a mini skirt, low cut shirt which shows off cleveage, and hooker boots or something of the like. Both are different life styles, with at least those two moral differentces because of how they grew up or what they believe. You would still except that they are two different life styles... homosexuality is much the same way. So I don't see why people are so uptight about it and can't except they love eachother and want to be bound together by marriage. Marriage isn't just a dream of heterosexuals, it's a dream homosexuals too, and to deny them rights to marriage would be taking away the free will God gave them to begin with. Your not going to be judged on their lifesyle, so why bother caring? it's pointless, really. That would be like denying someone the right to lie, which is also a sin, or the right to think what they want, and say what they want.
Yes Christian's believe in one truth, and that truth is God, but others believe in other things, like having multigods or nature... and some may just simlpy chose not to follow a religion. Those people have rights too. Just because they live a different life style than you shouldn't make a person judge whether or not they should have something. That goes against the Bible... more impertantly, one of the Ten Commandments.
If, at death, God appears and knocks his mighty hand upon peoples heads saying "You've abandoned me" or "What were you thinking!" or something of that sort and denies them a place in heaven because their sin, then He will have passed His judgement. THEN everyone will know that he does exist, but it'll be too late. Much like Christains if we ever meet another sort of god or gods. Everyone can follow a faith, but to know from experience what happens after death would unfortuanatly mean death.
Don't pass judgement on people's lives in Gods place. God knows more about those people than you do, He is the only one who can make an accurate judgement.
Reply
The Guild for Believers of Salvation through Christ

Goto Page: [] [<<] [<] 1 2 3 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 20 21 22 23 [>] [>>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum