Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply The Anti-Creationism Guild
Test..test?

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

divineseraph

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:03 pm


Hey... i'm not in this guild, but i would like to add my input.

I am not an atheist, though i do not believe in creationsim. I believe in evolution. However, the coincidences involved, the exact tuning of each atom, the way every single particle comes into play to not only create physical matter with concrete rules, but life itself- this seems a bit strange. in the words of vonnegut, why anything? why would atoms need to combine? why would oxygen and hydrogen need to have the exactly correct energy levels to always fuse into water, the life-sustaining compound? why would one chemical reaction be so special as to propogate itself and create not only thought but conciousness?

all of this just happening seems too far-fethced to me. I am no bible-thumper, i do not believe in the 7 days crap, at least not literally. I do, however, marvel at the coincidences that make not only life but matter possible and have concluded that it would jsut be too unlikely to just happen. i feel that there may be some force that had some kind of plan, and set all this up- a cosmic lego set or chemistry project, if you will
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:51 am


divineseraph
However, the coincidences involved, the exact tuning of each atom, the way every single particle comes into play to not only create physical matter with concrete rules, but life itself- this seems a bit strange. in the words of vonnegut, why anything? why would atoms need to combine? why would oxygen and hydrogen need to have the exactly correct energy levels to always fuse into water, the life-sustaining compound? why would one chemical reaction be so special as to propogate itself and create not only thought but conciousness?

all of this just happening seems too far-fethced to me. I am no bible-thumper, i do not believe in the 7 days crap, at least not literally. I do, however, marvel at the coincidences that make not only life but matter possible and have concluded that it would jsut be too unlikely to just happen. i feel that there may be some force that had some kind of plan, and set all this up- a cosmic lego set or chemistry project, if you will

Nothing that leads to life or sentience is anything other than inevitable if the conditions are right.

To use an analogy. The chances of anyone winning the lottery are slim. The chances of a winner of the lottery sitting around asking "wow, what are the odds of that happening to me?" are pretty high.

The odds don't matter, as it is only in an area where the odds hit the jackpot that sentience can arise to ask that question.

Redem
Captain


divineseraph

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:53 pm


but none of it HAD to happen. although your analogy is sensible, of all the infinity of impossibility, reality in itself without sentience is a miracle.

everything happens to fit perfectly. to make the analogy more like it, it would be like a lottery winner then being struck by lightning while being abducted by aliens, while being bitten by a shark and discovering the last living tasmanian devil.

there is not merely one coincidence, but millions upon eachother that cointeract with eachother into this perfection.
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:11 am


Given a large enough time, and a large enough sample of lottery players, that too is near inevitable. None of it absolutely had to happen, no, but it was fairly likely to.

It happened quite quickly after the earth became habitable.

Redem
Captain


gigacannon
Crew

PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 1:43 pm


Although there is little scientific evidence to back it up, I think that all the possible "dead universes" that do not support life do exist, in sufficiently remote dimensions (including the normal four). Note that this is true, for example, if you extrapolate further into the past or future, in which there was/will be no life. In other words, every lottery ticket with each number combination exists, winning large or smaller prizes depending on the combination. They are simply 'hidden'.

Again there is no reliable science to back this idea up, but it seems likely to me to be true (I don't normally rely on hunches, and wouldn't stake my reputation on this). However, I will say this; everything that can possibly exist does exist, somewhere, in space and time (and any hitherto undiscovered dimensions). If it does not exist anywhere in any dimensions then it would be improper to say that it can exist in any dimensions.

I mention all this because I dislike the notion that it is 'improbable' that we should find ourselves in a universe in which life can develop. The probability that it could happen wasn't low; it was 100%. It had to happen, because it did. We look at the universe from this perspective because this perspective has to exist; as does any other perspective. Life on other planets surely asks the same questions; why was I born on this planet, and not another? It is a foolish question; on another planet you would say the same thing.

Am I making sense?
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 1:25 am


the chances of a specific happening occuring naturally is always considerably low. But what must be considered is that if you have multiple tests, or occurances, for this specific happening to take place, it most likely will. The only reason you have the ability to say "what are the chances?" is becuz you exist. You exist becuz the chances played in your favor. there was always chance, and we all are indeed the lucky ones. The other potential ones most likely exceed a googleplex in amount.

Acrea-Teh-LogiC-Filter121


ProjectOmicron88

PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2007 9:51 pm


Think of it this way. If we were three-eyed, five-legged, two-tailed beings that spoke in grunts and gurgles, the same question would be asked. "Why are things the way they are? Why have we evolved to be this perfect?"

The truth is, in fact, humanity is not perfect. We can be killed by organisms we can't even see. We can be born deformed. We have no natural form of protection (i.e., turtles, blowfish, armadillos) or attack (i.e., bears, sharks, hydralisks). The thing is, we have to take a step back, and look at all the possible courses evolution could have taken, but didn't. Why did it turn out this way? Why does a pair of dice sometimes come up 7 and other times 11?

Basically, given enough time, anything can happen. And I really don't think saying "a couple billion years" of evolution really gives you a good picture of just how vast that time span is.
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 2:57 am


Considering that the universe was nothing more than a flaming hellstorm of plasma for the first 300,000 years and that it only took around 12 billion years for the universe to cool down enough from that for the Earth to form, 2 billion years is a long time. It seems that life on Earth has been here almost as long as the rocks have. Yet, advanced forms of life are only around half a billion years old. Still that's a long time. The scant five-odd million years it took for humans to evolve from more primitive apes is nothing in comparison, and evidence of human civilisation only seems to string back around ten thousand years.

Really we haven't been here long enough to expect to know all the answers.

gigacannon
Crew

Reply
The Anti-Creationism Guild

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum