Session Start (Sibeiko:SnipersImposter): Fri Nov 24 23:45:10 2006
[23:45:10] SnipersImposter: ...
[23:45:18] Sibeiko: O.o
[23:45:24] SnipersImposter: what?
[23:45:39] Sibeiko: you're the one that dotted meh... >_>
[23:45:47] SnipersImposter: ...so I did
[23:46:05] Sibeiko: indeed...
[23:46:40] Sibeiko: might I ask why?
[23:47:14] SnipersImposter: well, I've been meaning to talk to Cherry Wine, but she's a tough gal to get in touch with. You just happened to be online
[23:47:43] SnipersImposter: I don't think I have anything incriminating to say right now
[23:47:49] Sibeiko: Lol!
[23:48:07] Sibeiko: Well, she does seem to be worried that she's gonna be sniped... >_>
[23:48:14] SnipersImposter: oh right!
[23:48:26] SnipersImposter: Yeah, she's on the sniper's "Do Not Snipe" list.
[23:48:44] Sibeiko: interesting...
[23:49:03] SnipersImposter: because I, unlike her, actually know who the sniper is/is the sniper
[23:50:57] Sibeiko: sooo... she doesn't know then...
[23:52:16] SnipersImposter: if you choose to believe a nameless visage
[23:53:56] SnipersImposter: I'm obviously a fake
[23:54:13] Sibeiko: i couldn't tell... hehe
[23:54:22] SnipersImposter: good to know
[23:55:00] Sibeiko: but, i would like to give the sniper their due praise... so far, there seems to be a couple of "wild goose chases" that they've sent us on... ^_^
[23:55:24] SnipersImposter: on the contrary, none of those had anything to do with her
[23:55:53] SnipersImposter: or him
[23:56:54] Sibeiko: so, what you're saying is that the greatest force keeping us from figuring out who the sniper is...is ourselves?
[23:57:06] SnipersImposter: it appears that way
[23:57:36] Sibeiko: even though it's funny... and ironic... I'm not really surprised... ^_^
[23:58:20] Sibeiko: but i really did believe that the sniper played a part in those mindless sheeps... guess i was fooled...
[23:59:07] SnipersImposter: it's possible, but then the sniper's information ring would have to spread to everyone that did those sheepings. That would be difficult
[00:01:08] Sibeiko: not really, just to the person who instigated it, meaning the sniper would only have to prod a couple of people, like surrcreux (i know that's misspelled...too lazy to find her name...) to start things like what she did...and wham, large sheepings of innocent people...
[00:01:31] Sibeiko: but i do realize the possibility that she was just ticked that she got jailed...
[00:02:19] SnipersImposter: Crux started one, and so did Cherry. I suppose two people wouldn't be hard.
[00:03:15] Sibeiko: nope...and one or two more, especially near the end, would make the sniper's life MUCH easier...and eventually could wind up winning...could...
[00:03:35] Sibeiko: there's still a bit of a statistical problem... especially with the jailvoting...
[00:05:55] SnipersImposter: yep...it is my opinion that I don't like the idea of jailvoting.
[00:06:46] SnipersImposter: I must go. There is Diablo to be played
[00:07:00] Sibeiko: me neither... but the detective idea, i did like... i mean, with two killers, the game is balanced towards the killers winning, but the jailvote swings it too far the other way... iono...
[00:07:12] Sibeiko: k then, maybe we'll speak again... have fun! n_n
[00:07:21] SnipersImposter: thanks
Session Close (SnipersImposter): Sat Nov 25 00:07:57 2006