|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:17 pm
I was just wondering what you all thought of the Kinsey sexuality scale. Also, where do you all fit on it? If you don't know what it is, learn about it hereBtw, there's also technically and "x" for "non-sexual" or asexual.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:34 pm
Shiny Leather Boots I was just wondering what you all thought of the Kinsey sexuality scale. Also, where do you all fit on it? If you don't know what it is, learn about it hereBtw, there's also technically and "x" for "non-sexual" or asexual. Its alright. Kinda dated. As for where I fall on there I would be around a 4.7 or something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:57 pm
Well it's got a decent spectrum of sexual orientations. I would place myself at 4.5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:35 pm
I'd fall somewhere between a 4 and 5. It's kind of handy, since it's a bit more descriptive than gay/bi/straight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:18 pm
Yeah, probably a 5.5 for me xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:33 am
3. at this point in my life i have no preference to men or women
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:21 pm
I took this and got equally heterosexual and homosexual.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:25 pm
I'm more of a 2.5... I've dated guys and loved them but have leaned a little more towards girls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:29 am
I'm like a 10. But the kinsey scale is very loose and not very inclusive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:09 am
castrillo I'm like a 10. But the kinsey scale is very loose and not very inclusive. what do you mean by that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:19 pm
Shiny Leather Boots castrillo I'm like a 10. But the kinsey scale is very loose and not very inclusive. what do you mean by that? It doesn't account for every possible attribute of sexuality. It's very spoon-fed. A pansexual wouldn't even chart on the kinsey for example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 12:00 pm
castrillo Shiny Leather Boots castrillo I'm like a 10. But the kinsey scale is very loose and not very inclusive. what do you mean by that? It doesn't account for every possible attribute of sexuality. It's very spoon-fed. A pansexual wouldn't even chart on the kinsey for example. well, i suppose you could have a three dimensional graph, but that wouldn't be easy enough to understand, which is what makes the kinsey scale a useful tool especially for people who are trying to understand their sexuality for the first time, and not just in terms of straight, gay or bi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:49 am
I'm a 6. I don't really think anything of it. I define sexual orientation differently than this so It doesn't really bother me either way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 2:15 pm
castrillo I'm like a 10. But the kinsey scale is very loose and not very inclusive. I like the Klien Grid for that reason. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klein_Sexual_Orientation_Grid it expands on Kinsey's idea. Also limited in that it views gender as binary, which it most definitely isn't. Still even pansexuals have preferences, at least all the ones I've known have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
