|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 3:03 pm
Mr. MooreThe fact that it was allowed(I can't believe I didn't know about this until just recently... shitty indeed)is appalling. In more than one way... but, I'm not here to pass judgment on deeds of others. I just want to know.. Does stopping an act because of fear of terrorist attack reinforce the terrorists?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:44 pm
If you give in to fear then that is the very definition of letting terrorism prevail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:10 pm
Their are no terroist in this planet.
The Taliban are confused as terroist.
Look people, we gave them 53 mil and chem weapons are Ronald Regans election to fight off Russia or Prussia, some s**t like that. We made up 911 so we could attack for their oil, and we made a mockery of the REAL tapes of Osama by dubbing them. They have every right to kill us.
So please, what the ******** is a terroist?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:37 am
Positive Balance Their are no terroist in this planet. The Taliban are confused as terroist. Look people, we gave them 53 mil and chem weapons are Ronald Regans election to fight off Russia or Prussia, some s**t like that. We made up 911 so we could attack for their oil, and we made a mockery of the REAL tapes of Osama by dubbing them. They have every right to kill us. So please, what the ******** is a terroist? A terrorist is anyone that strives to instill terror. There are plenty of those on this planet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 1:15 pm
Obscurus Positive Balance Their are no terroist in this planet. The Taliban are confused as terroist. Look people, we gave them 53 mil and chem weapons are Ronald Regans election to fight off Russia or Prussia, some s**t like that. We made up 911 so we could attack for their oil, and we made a mockery of the REAL tapes of Osama by dubbing them. They have every right to kill us. So please, what the ******** is a terroist? A terrorist is anyone that strives to instill terror. There are plenty of those on this planet. Agreed. What you meant to say, I'm sure, is that there is no right nor wrong only different sides. In war, both sides are good and bad - just depends on what side of the spectrum you choose to side with. Our soldiers are doing what they think is good, but so are the terrorists. Sheep are sheep. Goats are goats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:11 pm
Sorgelig Alene Obscurus Positive Balance Their are no terroist in this planet. The Taliban are confused as terroist. Look people, we gave them 53 mil and chem weapons are Ronald Regans election to fight off Russia or Prussia, some s**t like that. We made up 911 so we could attack for their oil, and we made a mockery of the REAL tapes of Osama by dubbing them. They have every right to kill us. So please, what the ******** is a terroist? A terrorist is anyone that strives to instill terror. There are plenty of those on this planet. Agreed. What you meant to say, I'm sure, is that there is no right nor wrong only different sides. In war, both sides are good and bad - just depends on what side of the spectrum you choose to side with. Our soldiers are doing what they think is good, but so are the terrorists. Sheep are sheep. Goats are goats. He's arguing that terrorists don't exist; that all of that Taliban/Al Queda stuff is fabricated. I'm saying that terrorists exist everywhere, but not necessarily in the sense that we've been conditioned to understand the word (i.e. an Al Queda suicide bomber). Terrorism existed long before 9/11 and will exist into the future. As you've said, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:09 am
Obscurus Sorgelig Alene Obscurus Positive Balance Their are no terroist in this planet. The Taliban are confused as terroist. Look people, we gave them 53 mil and chem weapons are Ronald Regans election to fight off Russia or Prussia, some s**t like that. We made up 911 so we could attack for their oil, and we made a mockery of the REAL tapes of Osama by dubbing them. They have every right to kill us. So please, what the ******** is a terroist? A terrorist is anyone that strives to instill terror. There are plenty of those on this planet. Agreed. What you meant to say, I'm sure, is that there is no right nor wrong only different sides. In war, both sides are good and bad - just depends on what side of the spectrum you choose to side with. Our soldiers are doing what they think is good, but so are the terrorists. Sheep are sheep. Goats are goats. He's arguing that terrorists don't exist; that all of that Taliban/Al Queda stuff is fabricated. I'm saying that terrorists exist everywhere, but not necessarily in the sense that we've been conditioned to understand the word (i.e. an Al Queda suicide bomber). Terrorism existed long before 9/11 and will exist into the future. As you've said, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Ah, so he's a terrorist in his own right, hah. *insert sarcasm and fun here* Thanks for clarifying. Power is weakness as weakness is power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:13 am
Sorgelig Alene Mr. MooreThe fact that it was allowed(I can't believe I didn't know about this until just recently... shitty indeed)is appalling. In more than one way... but, I'm not here to pass judgment on deeds of others. I just want to know.. Does stopping an act because of fear of terrorist attack reinforce the terrorists? It reinforces terrorists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:28 am
Positive Balance Their are no terroist in this planet. The Taliban are confused as terroist. Look people, we gave them 53 mil and chem weapons are Ronald Regans election to fight off Russia or Prussia, some s**t like that. We made up 911 so we could attack for their oil, and we made a mockery of the REAL tapes of Osama by dubbing them. They have every right to kill us. So please, what the ******** is a terroist? WE didn't do anything, so WE are not a righteous kill. OUR GOVERNMENT gave them the money and weapons, therefore OUR GOVERNMENT is the one that should be killed. Don't involve the citizens for the regime's crime. WE gave THEM power to protect and regulate US, not to destroy everything else and cause problems for US. There is a difference between US/WE and THEM/OUR GOVERNMENT. They have no right to kill US. The have every right to kill U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 5:21 pm
Dalcain Positive Balance Their are no terroist in this planet. The Taliban are confused as terroist. Look people, we gave them 53 mil and chem weapons are Ronald Regans election to fight off Russia or Prussia, some s**t like that. We made up 911 so we could attack for their oil, and we made a mockery of the REAL tapes of Osama by dubbing them. They have every right to kill us. So please, what the ******** is a terroist? WE didn't do anything, so WE are not a righteous kill. OUR GOVERNMENT gave them the money and weapons, therefore OUR GOVERNMENT is the one that should be killed. Don't involve the citizens for the regime's crime. WE gave THEM power to protect and regulate US, not to destroy everything else and cause problems for US. There is a difference between US/WE and THEM/OUR GOVERNMENT. They have no right to kill US. The have every right to kill U.S.You make a wonderful point here, unfortunately when you attack a government it is hard not to attack the citizens as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 6:35 pm
Rob the Crowing Dalcain Positive Balance Their are no terroist in this planet. The Taliban are confused as terroist. Look people, we gave them 53 mil and chem weapons are Ronald Regans election to fight off Russia or Prussia, some s**t like that. We made up 911 so we could attack for their oil, and we made a mockery of the REAL tapes of Osama by dubbing them. They have every right to kill us. So please, what the ******** is a terroist? WE didn't do anything, so WE are not a righteous kill. OUR GOVERNMENT gave them the money and weapons, therefore OUR GOVERNMENT is the one that should be killed. Don't involve the citizens for the regime's crime. WE gave THEM power to protect and regulate US, not to destroy everything else and cause problems for US. There is a difference between US/WE and THEM/OUR GOVERNMENT. They have no right to kill US. They have every right to kill U.S.You make a wonderful point here, unfortunately when you attack a government it is hard not to attack the citizens as well. True, but I was pointing out that it is never right to kill us in general. The person above me made it seem like all was good with them attacking us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
