|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:55 pm
Word filtering is now ******** mandatory. I am only cussing right now to see if it is also in the guilds or just the normal forums.
What do you guys think?
I think this is some serious bullshit.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:16 pm
Good it was only a glitch.
But could that have been an accidental leak of what the new system and all might bring with it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 3:20 pm
How Mandatory?
Are we not allowed to swear in the Private Messages?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:03 pm
I thought it was because I'm on a public computer. Ain't that a b***h?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:59 pm
I'm really hoping that it was a benign glitch and we won't have filters. Though I myself do not swear often, I don't appreciate censorship... Hey, isn't it already filtered slightly?
Edit: Yeah, the least amount of filtering is "Minimal Filtering". Oh well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 9:03 pm
******** no! That is like against the U.S. amendment of free speech. I want those guys to filter every ******** swear word in ALL Languages! And yes the swear words are there meant to see if it does do filtering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 9:18 pm
I don't know if it's unconstitutional to censor out swears on an online forum for a company based in the US, but I'm pretty sure it would be laughed out of any courtroom. I don't think the people in charge of this filtration thing would be so thorough to pull out every swear in every language, since there's so many of them and all.
But, no need to worry. If people want to curse so badly, a simple way around it is to put tags in the middle of the word. Exactly like the way I put in a bold tag between the colon and the D when I want to :D without that stupid emote popping up. Even though there shouldn't be a need for filtering swears out of a 13+ forum. It's ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 9:58 pm
It was a glitch, but who knows if some code for the new page stuff got out a little early.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:14 pm
No wai! That sounds like it sucks! No, not sound like it, that DOES suck. Give people the choice like they do now. What's wrong with that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 10:49 am
Have we gone back to not being allowed to say the "P" word? >.>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:24 pm
`Manifest Have we gone back to not being allowed to say the "P" word? >.>
*****>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:30 pm
Kuma Woode `Manifest Have we gone back to not being allowed to say the "P" word? >.>
***** class="clear">
I was trying to think of what the "P" word was, too. Piss?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 4:06 pm
Wow... That's sad. I don't think that it is a BAD thing, but I also think it's a bad idea. ...Wait. That didn't make any sense. It's good for the younger kids that are on here, but not the full grown people that KNOW about those words, that SHOULD know about their usages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:06 pm
`Manifest Have we gone back to not being allowed to say the "P" word? >.> Palindrome?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
