|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:48 pm
I was just the tiniest bit disappointed by "Breaking Dawn" and, from what I've heard, several of my friends were, too. What was YOUR opinion of it?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 5:35 am
How could you be disappointed? I thought it was the best book in the saga.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 2:48 pm
I haven't finished yet, but so far, I'm finding Bella a bit less annoying, which is always a plus. (Why does every guy fall for her? She's so whiney and annoying!)
I'm just hoping it doesn't turn into pure ooey-gooey romance...
*prays* Please don't turn out like Harry Potter, pleeeaaase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:43 pm
I'm not really disappointed, since I expected it to be somewhat... odd/weird/unexpected/crappy. But I'm satisfied with how the series ended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:24 am
I've read about three quarters of the book, but I put it down two weeks ago and haven't bothered to finish (which is really unusual for me). I will get around to it, but I didn't feel into it enough (especially in comparison to the other three books).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 4:24 pm
It wasn't as bad as New Moon and Breaking Dawn, but I felt like it could've been 4x as epic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 5:50 pm
The first one was the best --- especially when compared to Breaking Dawn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
