|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 10:11 pm
Well.. actually reading this trial stuff.. I say that Ian's innocent. Though the Dbot didn't do very well against the Pbot. But the evidence places him AT the mansion but not setting the mansion on fire. There was no actual video evidence showing his FACE only his fingerprints which can easily be replicated as well as his clothing. Plus if we vote him guilty... I doubt that we'd be able to find out who the real arsonist who did it is if Ian IS actually innocent.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 10:11 pm
Ashram_VII For the most part, that definately appears to be the trend. Added to it is a bit of the entitlement mentality. "I did this, therefore I should get something for it." or simply "I should get this." (because I'm your boyfriend) What about just giving the girl you like a card and chocolate with no strings attached? Just to show, "I'm doing this because I like/love you and I want you to know." (EDIT - and I'm doing it on the day dedicated to Eros love) If you want to get people away from that kind of mentality, you would do best to remove the holiday as well. Valentine's day is just reinforcing that kind of mentality. If people give their girlfriend/boyfriend a card just to show "I'm doing this because like/love you and I want you to know." on other days of the year (excluding other anniversaries) and they choose to give them something on Valentine's day to show their love is pure, then the holiday holds meaning. Otherwise, I stand by what I say when I say it's a bullshit holiday that's marketed for every penny and is still around because companies know that they can get people to buy a bunch of crap because it's a "holiday".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 10:25 pm
OokamiKage_X Well.. actually reading this trial stuff.. I say that Ian's innocent. Though the Dbot didn't do very well against the Pbot. But the evidence places him AT the mansion but not setting the mansion on fire. There was no actual video evidence showing his FACE only his fingerprints which can easily be replicated as well as his clothing. Plus if we vote him guilty... I doubt that we'd be able to find out who the real arsonist who did it is if Ian IS actually innocent. If you notice two things about the video serveillance: 1. The flames don't move at all. 2. The time slot for 10:32 (or whatever hour it was) is missing. It goes 10:31, 10:33, 10:34. They also don't say where the fire started. For all we know it could've been down in the lab when LabTechX released all the grunnies. (More than likely)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 12:12 pm
Mizoko Tsukasa Elric Eat the flowers and smell the chocolate then. ... I'll just stick with my original plan. Fine, I'll eat your flowers and smell your chocolate. mad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:26 pm
It's obvious that Ian should be voted innocent because they is reasonable doubt. The 17% that voted guilty most likely were just joking around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 2:08 pm
MahouTragicQueen It's obvious that Ian should be voted innocent because they is reasonable doubt. The 17% that voted guilty most likely were just joking around. They probably did it for the ten gold. But seriously, the evidence against him is purely circumstancial. Though I heard some people want to vote him guilty because it would make a more interesting storyline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 2:10 pm
Tsukasa Elric Mizoko Tsukasa Elric Eat the flowers and smell the chocolate then. ... I'll just stick with my original plan. Fine, I'll eat your flowers and smell your chocolate. mad Brilliant plan. But can I at least smell my flowers first?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 2:37 pm
The people in your sig have pasty butts.
That's what you get for tanning only the top half of your body. D<
|
|
|
|
|
|
[sarcastic innocence] Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 2:49 pm
Samurai-Katagi But seriously, the evidence against him is purely circumstancial. Though I heard some people want to vote him guilty because it would make a more interesting storyline. That is true. confused
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 2:50 pm
Kyomi Terakada The people in your sig have pasty butts.
That's what you get for tanning only the top half of your body. D< I got it from my mom. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 4:07 pm
Samurai-Katagi MahouTragicQueen It's obvious that Ian should be voted innocent because they is reasonable doubt. The 17% that voted guilty most likely were just joking around. They probably did it for the ten gold. But seriously, the evidence against him is purely circumstancial. Though I heard some people want to vote him guilty because it would make a more interesting storyline.
I voted him guilty because it was the top choice, locationwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 4:16 pm
BEHOLD!
I have found girls' jeans that fit me and aren't cut in such a way that my butt crack is exposed!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:33 pm
Sir Ichigo BEHOLD! I have found girls' jeans that fit me and aren't cut in such a way that my butt crack is exposed! Are you going to have a party?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 7:34 pm
Thesenis Sir Ichigo BEHOLD! I have found girls' jeans that fit me and aren't cut in such a way that my butt crack is exposed! Are you going to have a party?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 3:47 am
Has anyone seen the "Anime causes *****" thread in the AMC? eek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
![[sarcastic innocence]'s avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/57/e0/33e6371f3e057_flip.png?t=1310784006_6.00_00)
