Kata Samoes
Buzz995
I would call myself pro-choice.
I would say that abortion should be avoided if possible. For example, if the baby is going to be healthy, and the family are able to give it a stable upbringing, then everything should be done to keep the baby. Or if the mother is sufficiently prepared, adoption is another alternative that should be considered.
However, if the baby is not healthy, the mothers life is at risk, or the situation is not right for the baby to be brought up in a loving environment (eg- financial difficulties, mother too young, unstable family situation etc) then abortion is a viable option.
I'm against late stage abortion though. After 24 weeks the foetus is viable outside the womb with medical intervention. However, this shouldn't mean life at all costs- if a baby is born prematurely and will have life long complications due to it, then thats a whole different debate, and I wouldn't want to put that suffering on a child. However, that's off the topic.
You can't make abortion illegal. If it did happen, then it'd go back to dangerous, back street abortions where the mother often ended up as dead as the foetus. And if they do reduce the time limit, then they need to start giving them on demand, because two referals then an apointment can often take up to a month or more. And if you don't find out for a month or so, then you run the risk of pushing it into late stage, which would be horrific for all involved.
As for if it's 'baby killing'- the foetus is not alive in a medical sense until theres a heartbeat. And personally, I wouldn't say it's alive until it's breathing for itself- so at birth. Not saying it should be aborted up until then, but I am saying it should not be called murder by prolifers.
1. It's not a baby. It's a fetus. Babies are born.
2. It's alive when it was an egg and sperm: life does not come from non-life.
3. Why is viability determined by financial reasoning, health, or age? What about the mother simply either not ready for one, regardless of any other reason, or NEVER wanting to be pregnant and be a mother. Adoption may solve unwanted parenting, but what about those who simply don't want to be or stay pregnant?
Oh yes. And what about rape?
1- I believe I only used baby to refer to anything outside the womb.
2- Life does not come from non-life? So whenever we have a period and the body naturally disposes of the egg this is the killing of a life is it? Scientifically speaking, it is not alive until it has a heartbeat, so thats the way I choose to think of life.
3- (Sorry- are you for or against abortion? You seem to keep switching. Just curiosity- I love people with good arguments
smile ) Viability of the foetus is not determined by financial reasoning, health, or age in my argument, viability of having a baby is. Slightly different. And if you read back, I said that if the sitauation for having a baby is not right, I support abortion. I would consider the mother having an aversion to pregnancy to be loosely attached to this, since the baby would not be loved therefore shouldnt have to be born into that household. However, I would say explored other options if possible.
4- Rape I do believe would again fall under the situation tag. But that's only a way to get pregnant (I'm not belittling rape, so don't jump on me for that anyone) whereas the handling of the pregnancy again falls under other peramaters. If the mother can deal with how her baby was conceived- and many do and love their children- then the other factors become the issue. If she can't mentally deal with the situation of her babies conception, then of course she should abort.