Welcome to Gaia! :: View User's Journal | Gaia Journals

FTC Continues to Target Payday Loan Lenders

The Federal Trade Commission has filed suit against some well-known names in the field for payday loan borrowers of debt relieving. The famous names include - PSC Administrative, Coastal Acquisitions, Infinity Customer Options, Infinity Collect, Jared Irby, and Richard Hughes.

All of those firms have been found guilty for violating the Telemarketing Sales Regulations. The FTC says-' consumers to provide debt relief services were supposedly approached by these firms. These debt relievers took consumers into confidence by promising that they and their loan provider will negotiate to raise the repayment period and also decrease the sum per repayment.

These so called 'debt relievers' compelled payday loan borrowers to invest cash into their plan and have misguided and encouraged the loan repayments to be neglected by them against the loan borrowed from lenders. A lot of these "lenders" hail from Ny or have taken part in offering payday loans to New Yorkers strictly prohibited.

The parties that were accused billed a fee at the time of enrolling consumers in their debt relieving plan. After that, they encouraged them to pay small payments that were considered to lower their loan repayment down or just waive off it. Many consumers who had registered in such programs say if they simply pay small sums to get an amount of 4 to 6 months always, that they were guaranteed waive away in loan.

Some consumers claim the debt relievers that is accused sent a 'form letter' to their lender requesting validation of their continuing loan. But no one has supported the claims that the businesses that were accused have negotiated to ease the burden off the shoulders of loan borrowers. The defendants maintained that the lenders would waive off the loan once they receive 'validation letter' sent through their company.

The loans that are special are not waived off, the repayment terms will be personally negotiated by the defendants with all the consumer's lender. The deceptive radio ads that propelled consumers to act included guaranteeing relief from debt. The ads targeted the individuals caught in the net of reimbursing one or more simultaneously running payday loans at a time.

Nevertheless, it is shocking that top lenders continued to collect debt as before even after many efforts of validation requests made to them. The accused debt alleviating companies took advantage of the precise provision of the 'validation of debt' in some specific scenario for payday loan borrowers.

The government till now has no strong evidence to prove these defendant firms guilty of financial fraud. The government wants signs and hard evidence to make these defendants stand not as innocent before the judicial system.