Welcome to Gaia! :: View User's Journal | Gaia Journals

FTC Continues to Target Payday Loan Lenders

The Federal Trade Commission has filed suit against some well known names in the field of debt relieving for payday loan borrowers. The well-known names include - Coastal Acquisitions, PSC Administrative, Infinity Client Solutions, Infinity Collect, Jared Irby, and Richard Hughes.

All those companies have been found guilty for violating the Telemarketing Sales Regulations. The FTC says-' these firms purportedly approached consumers to give debt relief services. These debt relievers took consumers into self-confidence by guaranteeing that they will negotiate using their loan supplier to increase the repayment period as well as reduce the amount per repayment.

These so called 'debt relievers' have misguided and compelled payday loan borrowers to invest cash in their plan and supported the loan repayments to be neglected by them against the loan. A lot of these "lenders" hail from Nyc or have taken part in offering outrageous fees on loans strictly prohibited.

The accused parties billed a fee during the time of registering consumers in their debt relieving program. After that, they encouraged them to pay little installments that were considered to lower down their loan repayment or just waive it off. Many consumers who had registered in such plans state which they were promised waive off in loan should they just pay modest sums for a period of four to six months always.

Some consumers assert the accused debt relievers sent a 'form letter' to their lender requesting validation of the continuing loan. But no one has supported the claims the firms that were accused have negotiated to ease the burden off the shoulders of loan borrowers. The defendants asserted that the lenders would waive the loan off once they receive 'validation letter' sent through their company.

In case, the specific loans will not be waived off, the defendants will negotiate the repayment terms together with the consumer's lender. The deceptive radio advertising that propelled consumers to act comprised guaranteeing relief from debt. The advertisements targeted the individuals found in the web of refunding one or more simultaneously running payday loans.

Nevertheless, it is shocking that top lenders continued to collect debt before even after many efforts of validation requests made to them. The accused debt alleviating businesses took advantage of the particular provision of the 'validation of debt' in some particular scenario for payday loan borrowers.

The government till now has no solid evidence to prove these defendant firms guilty of fiscal fraud. The government wants hard proofs and signs to make these defendants stand not as innocent before the judicial system.