Welcome to Gaia! :: View User's Journal | Gaia Journals

Victor of Fourteen major golf titles, Tiger Woods was infuriated by a satirical piece concerning him self printed in Golf Digest Mag and created by well-known golf author Dan Jenkins.

The actual piece labeled “My (Fake) Interview with Tiger” has been really obviously intended as satire. But because it turns out, the article author have written this with such a realistic words and phrases of frustration that it may appear to be not just a sarcasm.

Within the article, after some dillydallying in the introduction, Jenkins goes right into a prolonged question & answers with all the bogus Mr. The writer has described him quite badly as an sportsperson.

Referrals to Kim Kardashian, Tiger’s poor tipping routines, in addition to his exploitation of buddies in addition to knack for unfairly firing folks, are simply a some of the themes which Jenkins splashes on while slamming the pro golfer. The way of composing was actually obvious and also far too intense. Following that this article has been contributed over the web, and also triggered a lot of discussions when Tyger Woods him self responded to for the report declaring “Could you sink any lower? Discover delivered best golf courses which could be useful. Just click in the web page to learn way more regarding top 100 golf courses. You probably will obtain there a lot of golfing special offers

All of this has given for the interview a realistic appearance as well as everyone thought it. Nonetheless, from the beginning you could observe within the name of the article the ridiculous type of the interview.

Nevertheless, the question is still: is Jenkins’s half-comedic episode a worthy part of journalism, or perhaps is it no higher than a inexpensive shot at a bothered sportsman? We’re almost all pertaining to creative composing, as well as undoubtedly golfing journalism can use a little spicing up from time to time. Nevertheless it doesn’t look like Jenkins include a good deal of energy in to the aesthetics from the piece that actually really does read as premature allegation, possibly encompassing on libel.

Tiger Woods might give reason to end up being criticized. For this reason Jenkins might even call him away.

Yet there is a strategy to use concerning criticism, and Jenkins's write-up seems similar to making fun than whatever else. A number of athletes and reporters have noted that Woods generally doesn’t react to terrible force, it really isn’t worth his effort. However, this article has overcomed its edges that describes his behaviour.

It’s also entirely possible that the whole factor isn't greater than a Advertising stunt--but the end result is, if you’ve got something to express, voice it out by incorporating ethics. At the very least that’s the way we sense, and that’s exactly why we’re just a little turned off because of the entire scandal talking around this latest Golf Digest article.