|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:08 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:43 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:03 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:56 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 5:50 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:37 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:56 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:02 pm
|
|
|
|
Yusaru Shahal Rainrix Even in a free-for-all you have to choose 1 opponent if the card says "opponent" or "opponent's". Only cards that say "Destroy All", "Both Players" and "All Monster/ Spells &/or Traps" should be able to hit all players. For example: A card like "Tremendous Fire" would hit all of your opponent's because it says "opponent's". Thats not fair to anyone but you and it messes up alot of cards. A card thats ment to hit a single opponent then hits all opponents because of wording. This game isn't made for free-for-alls, so you have to treat all cards that say "opponent" or "opponent's" as "target opponent" or "target opponent's(as in aimming at something a single opponent has many of)". That works I guess. lol. It makes more sense anyway! Thanks!! biggrin
I used to play free-for-all all the time with my friends.
You are correct Labyrinthknight7. Thats how it'd work. mrgreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 7:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 2:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|