flyingemublue
your posts are to Looooooonnnggggg.
i read all of them. If being gay was right why would you need so much 'proof'.
i read all of them. If being gay was right why would you need so much 'proof'.
I need so much proof that homosexuality is "right" because if I don't provide all that proof, people can say I'm wrong and homosexuality is wrong.
Quote:
Quote: God made Adam and Eve, not Adan and Steve. I also have a feeling you accept the theory of evolution as true. Well sorry to spoil it if you thought being gay was caused by a gene, well its not. Evolution clearly states that genes must be able to be pasted on, sorry to tell you two guys can't make a baby.
Scientists have shown connections to genes for homosexuality being linked to genes for increased fertility in the opposite sex.
What I mean to say is, if your mother is extremely fertile or has a heightened sex drive towards men, that could make you gay. This doesn't work for me, because apparently my mother is lesbian in denial, but hey, if it's viable for other people, and it explains the evolution problem, it's logical.
As for Adam and Eve, there are many biblical relationships that break that model. So don't use it as a condemnation of one particular relationship.
Quote:
PS sorry if i sound mean, I just wanted to point some things out.
MICAH
PS I would love to talk more about this, so PM me.
MICAH
PS I would love to talk more about this, so PM me.
I would, but I get banned so often we couldn't have a decent conversation. I'd be happy to debate here though.
Quote:
also there have been many scholars looking at passages like the ones you referenced for about 2000 years most if not all agreed that the passages should look like they do now:hence how they look now. People have tryed to connect CHriastianity to our cultur with 'Desprite' theorys like the Gap theory or the Local flood theory. But it doesn't work to well.
The problem is, these scholars only look at the passages themselves. They don't look at the culture surrounding them, and if they do so out of curiousity, they are forbidden from adding that cultural context into the Bible out of respect for the divinely inspired scriptures. As a result, we have a Bible that refers to a culture 2000 years ago, with very different customs, as you recognise, but people try to apply the words written to that culture to this culture.