|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:18 pm
|
|
|
|
It's ok to drink, but not get drunk. The bible even says to drink a little wine everyday. Tho you have to consider what wine was like back then. I don't know if this is a fact, but I believe in church a youth teacher talked about how back then wine was not as strong as it is now.
Cussing... I stumble with it too. The book of James hits that subject. Check out James 1:19-21, 26 3:6, 9-12. I don't remember what verse or book, but I remember reading about how what comes out of the mouth is a reflection of the heart. This is likely especially true when it's done unconsciensly.
A follow up on what rockmanx said about not doing somthing that will make your brother stumble. For example, if you're trying to reach a person for Christ who you know is critical about Christianity and is watching & judging your every action, then don't do things that will make them close their minds to you. The thing is, whether we realize it or not, people are always watching us. And people are always judging us. It's not fair. Absolutely. But it's reality. And we aren't perfect, but... we can be aware that by cussing/drinking, we might undermine our ministry attemps with certain people.
I'm not saying you should hide drinking a little wine every now and then, but be aware of who you drink with. Most people believe Christianity is all rules and usually the rules they hear are skewered. People believe the Bible contradicts itself because they either don't read the verse themselves, or don't read it in context, or don't even finish the verse once they read a part they don't like. Then they spazz out about the Bible contradicting itself. So I guess if you know someone will totally spazz out if you drink around them, then don't. Wait until they are a little more understanding and open before doing so & make sure to have your Bible with you so you can show them the verses that tell you to drink a little, but not get drunk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:40 pm
|
|
|
|
Tesah A follow up on what rockmanx said about not doing somthing that will make your brother stumble. For example, if you're trying to reach a person for Christ who you know is critical about Christianity and is watching & judging your every action, then don't do things that will make them close their minds to you. The thing is, whether we realize it or not, people are always watching us. And people are always judging us. It's not fair. Absolutely. But it's reality. And we aren't perfect, but... we can be aware that by cussing/drinking, we might undermine our ministry attemps with certain people. I'm not saying you should hide drinking a little wine every now and then, but be aware of who you drink with. Most people believe Christianity is all rules and usually the rules they hear are skewered. People believe the Bible contradicts itself because they either don't read the verse themselves, or don't read it in context, or don't even finish the verse once they read a part they don't like. Then they spazz out about the Bible contradicting itself. So I guess if you know someone will totally spazz out if you drink around them, then don't. Wait until they are a little more understanding and open before doing so & make sure to have your Bible with you so you can show them the verses that tell you to drink a little, but not get drunk. That's a little flawed, though. Why should we not do something that is perfectly acceptable in the eyes of God just because someone doesn't know all the rules of Christianity.
I'd say that one should, in all one's actions, be prepared to justify themselves biblically, not hide behind a false mask of what the world believes Christianity is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:20 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:31 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 6:30 pm
|
|
|
|
Cometh The Inquisitor If we can't do it in public, what changes when we're at home? Now, I have not taken the time to read all of the posts in here yet, but this one caught my eye along with another, but this one mainly. I am not sure if any one answered this, but if they have, then just bare with a repeat.
It doesn't change a thing. This was the point that was being made and I completely agree. Whenever I do something wrong that I know I shouldn't be doing, I remember that I am being watched. It doesn't matter if it is before, during, or after I do something, I will always regret doing it. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 2:19 am
|
|
|
|
So I was wandering through religious guild forums and saw this, just thought I'd throw a little thing out there.
Drinking is not a sin, unless your New Testament completely changed thousands of years of divine precedence, hence, wine has always been considered a blessing from G-d.
"Baruch atah Adonoy, eloheynu melech ha'olam, boray p'ri hagafen."
Blessed are you Adonai, L-rd our G-d, ruler of the universe, who creates the fruit of the vine.
I can't speak with authority on the New Testament, but the precedent on drunkenness since Moses is that drunkenness isn't bad (in fact, depending on whose interpretation you favor, drunkenness is, by many Jews, considered a holy experience), however we are heavily warned to excercise restraint when drunk.
However, alcoholism is a bad thing, as it is called to'evah(an abomination) in Leviticus.
Incense, cannabis, and a number of other things were burned regularly in the great Temple. Again, this may be a New Testament thing, but smoking isn't forbidden at all based on OT laws.
As for cursing, well, Isaiah has the whole spiel about unclean lips. But that's up to interpretation. Depends on what you call unclean. Most people I know who are into this, define unclean as being slanderous and dishonest (which is actually the closest translation I can deduce when I read the Hebrew).
And saying 'G-d' is not taking his name in vain. The commandment reads "ha Shem" which is a very specific indicator. Literally it means THE Name. That is, Hashem's (notice we call him Hashem very often) actual, personally identifiable name. Most people know this name as YHWH, or YHVH. We call it the Tetragrammaton, the letters in Hebrew are Yod-hay-vav-hay. To note these days, is you aren't even capable of using this name in vain anymore, because no one knows how to pronounce it. Vowel keys did not exist in Hebrew until the 1930s or so, so we have no idea what the vowel sounds on this name are, because, the only person who regularly spoke this name (because of its sanctity), was the Kohain Gadol (high priest of the Temple), and he only said it once a year.
So, saying G-d, or Hashem, or El, or Elohim, or so on and so forth, are not taking his name in vain, because it is not THE Name, they're jsut nicknames, really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:29 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:02 pm
|
|
|
|
Babbalui Now, I have not taken the time to read all of the posts in here yet, but this one caught my eye along with another, but this one mainly. I am not sure if any one answered this, but if they have, then just bare with a repeat. It doesn't change a thing. This was the point that was being made and I completely agree. Whenever I do something wrong that I know I shouldn't be doing, I remember that I am being watched. It doesn't matter if it is before, during, or after I do something, I will always regret doing it. sweatdrop When I made this post, it was in response to someone saying that certain things are not sins, as long as no one is watching (i.e. at home).
This, to me was incredibly, foolish, since we aren't trying to be pure for the benefit of others but because God commanded us to. If we set a double standard, then we are just hypocrites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:08 pm
|
|
|
|
Stxitxchxes And saying 'G-d' is not taking his name in vain. The commandment reads "ha Shem" which is a very specific indicator. Literally it means THE Name. That is, Hashem's (notice we call him Hashem very often) actual, personally identifiable name. Most people know this name as YHWH, or YHVH. We call it the Tetragrammaton, the letters in Hebrew are Yod-hay-vav-hay. To note these days, is you aren't even capable of using this name in vain anymore, because no one knows how to pronounce it. Vowel keys did not exist in Hebrew until the 1930s or so, so we have no idea what the vowel sounds on this name are, because, the only person who regularly spoke this name (because of its sanctity), was the Kohain Gadol (high priest of the Temple), and he only said it once a year. So, saying G-d, or Hashem, or El, or Elohim, or so on and so forth, are not taking his name in vain, because it is not THE Name, they're jsut nicknames, really. Just a question, but, why do you still not type out 'God' and, instead, use 'G-d'. Also, how do you (if you, in fact do) do that verbally?
Just wondering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 6:11 pm
|
|
|
|
Cometh The Inquisitor Stxitxchxes And saying 'G-d' is not taking his name in vain. The commandment reads "ha Shem" which is a very specific indicator. Literally it means THE Name. That is, Hashem's (notice we call him Hashem very often) actual, personally identifiable name. Most people know this name as YHWH, or YHVH. We call it the Tetragrammaton, the letters in Hebrew are Yod-hay-vav-hay. To note these days, is you aren't even capable of using this name in vain anymore, because no one knows how to pronounce it. Vowel keys did not exist in Hebrew until the 1930s or so, so we have no idea what the vowel sounds on this name are, because, the only person who regularly spoke this name (because of its sanctity), was the Kohain Gadol (high priest of the Temple), and he only said it once a year. So, saying G-d, or Hashem, or El, or Elohim, or so on and so forth, are not taking his name in vain, because it is not THE Name, they're jsut nicknames, really. Just a question, but, why do you still not type out 'God' and, instead, use 'G-d'. Also, how do you (if you, in fact do) do that verbally? Just wondering.
It's mostly out of custom. The reasoning behind it is that writing G-d places his name into the material,and thus makes it very susceptible to defamation and desecration, even if G-d isn't his actual name. And no, we don't go "G'd" when we speak it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|