|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 11:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 11:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 11:57 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 6:46 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 7:32 am
|
Gravitational Molestation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 7:45 am
|
|
|
|
Gravitational Molestation Also, no one good runs Gadgets.
I refer you to this;
Archolite And btw, nobody uses Black Rose..... stare Seriously, where do people get these ideas? By the way, Fissure is actually used in Gadgets. Not much else uses it though... Especially for the link
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 7:53 am
|
|
|
|
brotherofAnubus Gravitational Molestation Also, no one good runs Gadgets. I refer you to this; Archolite And btw, nobody uses Black Rose..... stare Seriously, where do people get these ideas? By the way, Fissure is actually used in Gadgets. Not much else uses it though... Especially for the link Not only will I refer you to the date, I'll point out the fact that Peter Cheng is a banned player due to cheating. Try again Anubis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gravitational Molestation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 8:20 am
|
|
|
|
Gravitational Molestation brotherofAnubus Gravitational Molestation Also, no one good runs Gadgets. I refer you to this; Archolite And btw, nobody uses Black Rose..... stare Seriously, where do people get these ideas? By the way, Fissure is actually used in Gadgets. Not much else uses it though... Especially for the link Not only will I refer you to the date, I'll point out the fact that Peter Cheng is a banned player due to cheating. Try again Anubis. Yeah... that was just one tournament... And, Gadgets are still very commonly played, You seemed to know what you were talking about at first, but not so much anymore. Also, a deck doesn't have to be played to be good. Think back on Shonen Jump Championships a few years ago, Jeff Jones won with a Dark Skill Drain Deck, not many people played that, and he was the only one who topped with it.
For you to make such generalizations, you must not be very good yourself. Not to mention, the way you phrase that sentence, you make it sound as if any player who plays gadgets sucks. When in reality, Gadgets are very consistent and have been topping for quite a while. Learn to play, kid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 8:26 am
|
|
|
|
Archolite Gravitational Molestation brotherofAnubus Gravitational Molestation Also, no one good runs Gadgets. I refer you to this; Archolite And btw, nobody uses Black Rose..... stare Seriously, where do people get these ideas? By the way, Fissure is actually used in Gadgets. Not much else uses it though... Especially for the link Not only will I refer you to the date, I'll point out the fact that Peter Cheng is a banned player due to cheating. Try again Anubis. Yeah... that was just one tournament... And, Gadgets are still very commonly played, You seemed to know what you were talking about at first, but not so much anymore. Also, a deck doesn't have to be played to be good. Think back on Shonen Jump Championships a few years ago, Jeff Jones won with a Dark Skill Drain Deck, not many people played that, and he was the only one who topped with it. For you to make such generalizations, you must not be very good yourself. Not to mention, the way you phrase that sentence, you make it sound as if any player who plays gadgets sucks. When in reality, Gadgets are very consistent and have been topping for quite a while. Learn to play, kid. Gadgets are commonly played by bad players. Any player who plays gadgets does suck.
Play me Archolite. Right now, we're both here. I'll be in the table top tiny chat. tinychat.com/gaiaduelarena
EDIT: Dark Skill Drain is not Gadgets. Completely different decks that happened in completely different situations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gravitational Molestation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 8:32 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 11:16 am
|
|
|
|
Gravitational Molestation Archolite Gravitational Molestation brotherofAnubus Gravitational Molestation Also, no one good runs Gadgets. I refer you to this; Archolite And btw, nobody uses Black Rose..... stare Seriously, where do people get these ideas? By the way, Fissure is actually used in Gadgets. Not much else uses it though... Especially for the link Not only will I refer you to the date, I'll point out the fact that Peter Cheng is a banned player due to cheating. Try again Anubis. Yeah... that was just one tournament... And, Gadgets are still very commonly played, You seemed to know what you were talking about at first, but not so much anymore. Also, a deck doesn't have to be played to be good. Think back on Shonen Jump Championships a few years ago, Jeff Jones won with a Dark Skill Drain Deck, not many people played that, and he was the only one who topped with it. For you to make such generalizations, you must not be very good yourself. Not to mention, the way you phrase that sentence, you make it sound as if any player who plays gadgets sucks. When in reality, Gadgets are very consistent and have been topping for quite a while. Learn to play, kid. Gadgets are commonly played by bad players. Any player who plays gadgets does suck. Play me Archolite. Right now, we're both here. I'll be in the table top tiny chat. tinychat.com/gaiaduelarena EDIT: Dark Skill Drain is not Gadgets. Completely different decks that happened in completely different situations. Wow, you're such an idiot, Gadgets aren't a bad deck. & I never said that they were similar in playstyle or anything. I just said a deck doesn't have to be popular to be good. You obviously have no clue, and I don't play online, because people can cheat far too easily and I have no reason to trust you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 11:57 am
|
|
|
|
Archolite Wow, you're such an idiot, Gadgets aren't a bad deck. Yeah, they are. Gadgets are a budget fallback for players who can't manage to make anything else. Good to start, but not in the meta when they can't provide the explosion necessary. They've dropped out completely, but for the past year, starting with the link you've provided, they're barely able to stay solely on the existence of Machina Fortress. Gadgets served as a mediocre method to supply and thin, and now with the release of Karakuri, the numbers are dwindling even further.
Machina Fortress is good. Gadgets are terrible.
Archolite & I never said that they were similar in playstyle or anything. I just said a deck doesn't have to be popular to be good. It has to be popular if, according to your previous statement, Gadgets have been topping this entire time. Which isn't true, of course, it seldom happens in the higher competitive fields.
Archolite You obviously have no clue, and I don't play online, because people can cheat far too easily and I have no reason to trust you. Yet you support your evidence on ONE tournament, clenched by an individual who had their title stripped and banned from future tournaments. Okay.
Time for you to rethink on who's the brainless t**t.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 12:26 pm
|
Gravitational Molestation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 3:12 pm
|
|
|
|
First off, Gravitational Molestation, you did nothing to "chase me off". Your argument is beyond stupid, and your "level of intelligence" is a lot lower than mine, not that that is very relevant. But if you are going to try to make yourself sound smart, don't attempt to do so after making such idiotic claims. Your IQ is obviously very low... But hey, this world needs stupid people, they are fun to laugh at.
Second, Mustard, Gadgets do top quite often. Look it up, even in more recent tournaments they still top... So, try to know what you're talking about next time. And I don't generally supply a million links for those who are too lazy to do their own research. As for you implying I'm the brainless t**t, that is an empty statement when you can't back it up. As most insults are, but hey, like I said earlier, stupid people are always fun to laugh at. So, enjoy your low IQ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|