|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:32 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 1:15 pm
|
|
|
|
zetricky Fox Demon Shippo zetricky You can't say that E-Heroes aren't much of a debate point. E-Heroes were made to fuse the same way synchro archetype decks (like the Warriors and the Blackwings) we're made to do synchro summoning. True, I suppose you're right.
And, while Tuners tend to be weaker, a lot of the time they compensate by neat effects (aka Blacking Gale).
Also, what Labyrinth said. I suppose both of you guys have a good point too. :3 Synchros and tuners do have quite awesome effects and many decks of this type were greatly supported over the past years compared to fusions. Both have pros and cons. I just hope Fusions and Synchros won't stop getting support cards now that Exceeds have come. xDD
UGH, I KNOW. I'm not too much of a fan of Exceeds, but they seem interesting. I just hope that Sycnhros keep being made as much as they are, and worked with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:05 pm
|
|
|
|
Fox Demon Shippo zetricky Fox Demon Shippo zetricky You can't say that E-Heroes aren't much of a debate point. E-Heroes were made to fuse the same way synchro archetype decks (like the Warriors and the Blackwings) we're made to do synchro summoning. True, I suppose you're right.
And, while Tuners tend to be weaker, a lot of the time they compensate by neat effects (aka Blacking Gale).
Also, what Labyrinth said. I suppose both of you guys have a good point too. :3 Synchros and tuners do have quite awesome effects and many decks of this type were greatly supported over the past years compared to fusions. Both have pros and cons. I just hope Fusions and Synchros won't stop getting support cards now that Exceeds have come. xDD UGH, I KNOW. I'm not too much of a fan of Exceeds, but they seem interesting. I just hope that Sycnhros keep being made as much as they are, and worked with. Indeed. Exceeds may have something awesome to show but at least don't stop supporting the others or else Synchros and Fusions would end up broken like the Rituals. Well I think the debate is now over. It seems now we're talking about Exceeds Vs Synchros and Fusions which is kinda a lil bit off topic. xDD Anyway, nice having such a discussion with all of ya!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 2:25 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 3:22 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 3:34 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gravitational Molestation
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 9:51 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:03 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:31 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:45 am
|
|
|
|
Mustard Like Soup kurousagi35 ... and some of they're effects are just as good if not better than synchros. For example take Brionac, it can send any number of cards back to the hand by discarding the same number of cards, but XYZ Dragon Cannon (one of my favs) can DESTROY any number of cards by discarding the same number. Oh my god. Dumbest post I've read in this thread yet.
I agree, although XYZ has a powerful effect, it's very harrd to bring out, even before synchros were invented. (although rollout currently helps) Not to mention there are so many cards that protect against destruction effects, while i can't think fo a single card that stops bouncing in general.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:20 pm
|
|
|
|
axean Mustard Like Soup kurousagi35 ... and some of they're effects are just as good if not better than synchros. For example take Brionac, it can send any number of cards back to the hand by discarding the same number of cards, but XYZ Dragon Cannon (one of my favs) can DESTROY any number of cards by discarding the same number. Oh my god. Dumbest post I've read in this thread yet. I agree, although XYZ has a powerful effect, it's very harrd to bring out, even before synchros were invented. (although rollout currently helps) Not to mention there are so many cards that protect against destruction effects, while i can't think fo a single card that stops bouncing in general. Its true that it is hard to summon it but thats just another reason why I like it and other fusions for that matter because they aren't so easy that a preschooler can summon them, so you don't see them in every deck they're unique, and unlike synchros you actually have to do some thinking to summon a fusion (not counting E-heroes).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 8:24 pm
|
|
|
|
kurousagi35 axean Mustard Like Soup kurousagi35 ... and some of they're effects are just as good if not better than synchros. For example take Brionac, it can send any number of cards back to the hand by discarding the same number of cards, but XYZ Dragon Cannon (one of my favs) can DESTROY any number of cards by discarding the same number. Oh my god. Dumbest post I've read in this thread yet. I agree, although XYZ has a powerful effect, it's very harrd to bring out, even before synchros were invented. (although rollout currently helps) Not to mention there are so many cards that protect against destruction effects, while i can't think fo a single card that stops bouncing in general. Its true that it is hard to summon it but thats just another reason why I like it and other fusions for that matter because they aren't so easy that a preschooler can summon them, so you don't see them in every deck they're unique, and unlike synchros you actually have to do some thinking to summon a fusion (not counting E-heroes). Fusions were an idea gone sour due to the mandatory effort of summoning them, especially the XYZ series, which lacked the means through Polymerization and the ability to bring themselves to the field like Gladiator Beasts. It was clearly flawed.
Regardless, I didn't quote your post regarding its summoning requirement, which of course plays a role in a card's worth and usefulness. It's solely in regard to the difference of their two effects, and bewilderment of how you could possibly regard Brionac's to be the lesser of the two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 2:43 am
|
|
|
|
Mustard Like Soup kurousagi35 axean Mustard Like Soup kurousagi35 ... and some of they're effects are just as good if not better than synchros. For example take Brionac, it can send any number of cards back to the hand by discarding the same number of cards, but XYZ Dragon Cannon (one of my favs) can DESTROY any number of cards by discarding the same number. Oh my god. Dumbest post I've read in this thread yet. I agree, although XYZ has a powerful effect, it's very harrd to bring out, even before synchros were invented. (although rollout currently helps) Not to mention there are so many cards that protect against destruction effects, while i can't think fo a single card that stops bouncing in general. Its true that it is hard to summon it but thats just another reason why I like it and other fusions for that matter because they aren't so easy that a preschooler can summon them, so you don't see them in every deck they're unique, and unlike synchros you actually have to do some thinking to summon a fusion (not counting E-heroes). Fusions were an idea gone sour due to the mandatory effort of summoning them, especially the XYZ series, which lacked the means through Polymerization and the ability to bring themselves to the field like Gladiator Beasts. It was clearly flawed. Regardless, I didn't quote your post regarding its summoning requirement, which of course plays a role in a card's worth and usefulness. It's solely in regard to the difference of their two effects, and bewilderment of how you could possibly regard Brionac's to be the lesser of the two.
I think they both serve to be good in their own ways...XYZ gets rid of cards that are getting annoying such as Swords of revealing light, since Brionac would just keep giving it back until you're out of a hand. But Brionac gets rid of mystery cards that you don't wanna tangle with where XYZ could would trigger an effect much easier than Brionac.
And for the record, XYZ Dragon Cannon is one of my personal favorites as well. but I would use Brionac more...if I had it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 2:45 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|