Welcome to Gaia! ::


24,500 Points
  • Cool Cat 500
  • Party Animal 100
  • Destroyer of Cuteness 150
Quote:

Listen up, ladies. If you want to figure out if your date is a nice guy or a jerk, take a look at his hands.

A strange new study suggests that the shorter a guy's index finger is compared to his ring finger, the more likely he is to be nice to women. Guys whose index fingers and ring fingers are close in length, or whose index fingers are longer than their ring fingers, watch out!

"When with women, men with smaller ratios [of index to ring finger] were more likely to listen attentively, smile and laugh, compromise or compliment the other person," Dr. Debbie Moskowitz, a psychology professor at McGill University in Montreal and the study's lead author, said in a written statement.

Moskowitz and her colleagues measured the fingers of 155 men and women, and for each calculated their digit ratio--that is, the length of the index finger to the length of the ring finger. Then, over the course of 20 days, the study participants kept track of every social interaction they had that lasted over five minutes, classifying their own behavior toward others as either agreeable or quarrelsome.

The researchers found no link between behavior and digit ratio in women. But men with small digit ratios reported engaging in one-third more agreeable behaviors and one-third fewer quarrelsome behaviors. What's more, guys with small ratios tended to be less quarrelsome with women than with other men.

"These behaviors support the formation and maintenance of relationships with women," Moskowitz said in the statement. "This might explain why they have more children on average."

The study adds to a large body of research on digit ratio and its relationship with behavior and physical traits. A study published earlier this month showed that men and women with small digit ratios are more likely to be promiscuous. A 2011 study linked small digit ratios in men with longer penises.

What could possibly explain this fateful finger phenomenon?

Previous research suggests digit ratio is determined by the amount of testosterone and other male hormones to which a fetus is exposed in the womb, with small ratios indicating higher levels of the hormones. And the same hormones that affect digit ratio likely affect the development of the brain and body, resulting in other physical and behavioral differences.

The new study is to be published in the March 2015 issue of the journal Personality and Individual Differences.

Source


Somewhere someone will be taking a measuring tape on that first date after reading this. whee

Eloquent Lunatic

10,425 Points
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Tycoon 200
  • Wall Street 200
A fine example of how correlation =/= causation can get ridiculous.
Utter horseshit.

Snuggly Buddy

29,150 Points
  • Conversationalist 100
  • Mark Twain 100
  • Conventioneer 300
I'm skeptical.

Yuki_Windira's Husband

Invisible Hunter

13,800 Points
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Marathon 300
  • Forum Sophomore 300
Kothlim
Utter horseshit.


This.

Fluffy Flatterer

Valiant Corvus
A fine example of how correlation =/= causation can get ridiculous.

Divine Anubutt

27,850 Points
  • Skilled Snowfriend Architect 100
  • Daring Investigator 50
  • WilyTrickster 50
this seems as accurate as you being gay if your hand is bigger than your face >.>;

Sparkly Shapeshifter

12,950 Points
  • Megathread 100
  • Lavish Tipper 200
  • Person of Interest 200
I wonder what they say about women's fingers.
Funny how everyone is quick to deny science.
It is a weird study I will admit.

But they wouldn't post the findings if it wasn't statistically significant.

Mewling Consumer

16,100 Points
  • Alchemy Level 3 100
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Hive Mind 200
David2074
I'm skeptical.
It is strange, but digit ratio research is a common thing. It is a valid measure of prenatal testosterone exposure. Albeit indirect, it is one of the most convenient ones that we have. Here is wikipedia's page on digit ratio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digit_ratio

Dainty Detective

9,450 Points
  • Foolhardy Benefactor 500
  • Lapin Patrol Haldus: Victory! 100
  • Grunny Grabber 50
Valiant Corvus
A fine example of how correlation =/= causation can get ridiculous.

This, certainly. Even if there is a scientific basis regarding finger length and testosterone levels, this article presents the study in a very misleading way.

Blood Valkyrie
I wonder what they say about women's fingers.

The article quoted said that there was no apparent correlation in women's ratios.

Alien Dog

17,850 Points
  • Citizen 200
  • Voter 100
  • Mark Twain 100
Gellus
Valiant Corvus
A fine example of how correlation =/= causation can get ridiculous.

This, certainly. Even if there is a scientific basis regarding finger length and testosterone levels, this article presents the study in a very misleading way.

Blood Valkyrie
I wonder what they say about women's fingers.

The article quoted said that there was no apparent correlation in women's ratios.


Of course there wasn't, because that would be sexist.

Angelic Husband

11,300 Points
  • Millionaire 200
  • Tycoon 200
  • Popular Thread 100
This sounds like BS

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum