Beena the Mystery
Lady Mizumi
It actually depends.
If they would critic a work about its concept, for example, their interpretation about the work, then it's completely fine. Being able to hear from your audience concept-wise is great plus you can even add another meaning to your work. That's why it's important to ask opinions from other people most importantly when a work is in progress.
But being criticized image-wise (especially with negative comments) by someone who isn't even art-educated is not effin' cool. At all.
scream
But but but I have to admit that
COMPLIMENTS SOUND SO NICE redface heart heart
So you don't think non-artists are valid in giving constructive critique on art?
Not really, no. What I'm saying is that you have to
study something to fully appreciate it. Not
every non-artist in the world is incapable of giving sensible remarks on works of art, whatever art field it may be.
Just an example: if a person have had at least attended and participated in just enough ballet workshops in order for her to be familiar with the do's and dont's of a ballerina, that's when I think a fellow ballerina would gladly accept her comments and suggestions. Let's say she watched numerous ballet recitals. She will gain more knowledge about other ballerina's movements (and/or style) even if she is no longer putting it into practice. However, what she is putting into practice is how she will be a good/better critique of dance/performing arts.
In conclusion,
it depends on how much a person knows something for her to be a more effective critique. And more importantly, it depends on the artist if he/she will favor one's critique. It just happens that an artist values other people's critique on top of... the others.
I really hope I made sense. I think all these babbling can be related to a saying, though:
"It takes one to know one."
smile biggrin smile
you have to remember though... this is an opinion and is still subjective. neutral