Unknown Curiosity
(?)Community Member
- Posted: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 04:14:55 +0000
I am college student majoring in Psychology and this question (the title) has become something I've heard way too often around my university.
The debate of whether Psychology is a "real" science or just a "wannabe" science. I actually work in the Science building at my school, the department of Natural Sciences, and I've had the faculty there talk about psychology at times and make fun about it not being a legitimate science in comparison to chemistry, physics, biology, and so forth.
It's really irritating to me at least. I mean I consider them all "real" sciences. If something is pseudoscience it is that way across the board regardless of field, but if following the scientific method and other aspects, it's a way of science. Psychology is more prone to a wider field, mainly humans, but that does not mean it's not good enough to be considered a science.
Point in question, what do you think on this entirety? Have you ever been told before that Psychology is not a real science and have had it dissed? If so, what you have said or done to prove to others that they're wrong about that assumption?
The debate of whether Psychology is a "real" science or just a "wannabe" science. I actually work in the Science building at my school, the department of Natural Sciences, and I've had the faculty there talk about psychology at times and make fun about it not being a legitimate science in comparison to chemistry, physics, biology, and so forth.
It's really irritating to me at least. I mean I consider them all "real" sciences. If something is pseudoscience it is that way across the board regardless of field, but if following the scientific method and other aspects, it's a way of science. Psychology is more prone to a wider field, mainly humans, but that does not mean it's not good enough to be considered a science.
Point in question, what do you think on this entirety? Have you ever been told before that Psychology is not a real science and have had it dissed? If so, what you have said or done to prove to others that they're wrong about that assumption?