Pipebracket
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 07:28:02 +0000
God Emperor Akhenaton
Tadpole Jackson
God Emperor Akhenaton
Tadpole Jackson
God Emperor Akhenaton
Annual inspections, must be licensed, must be registered annually, people must have a license, people must be mentally and physically competent to use one, they must take a course and training and any infractions would be fined with a confiscation of the firearm if the infraction is major.
And you may be right about the constitution, but it was at a different time. The US was poor during the writing of the constitution and as a result, the arming of the nation was necessary to have a standing military against the imperial powerhouses of Europe if they were to survive as a nation. Now 232 years later, the US is really no different from Imperial Great Britain. And in all honesty, cars are more important than guns. With automobiles, we are able to transport food from farms to a city with very little agriculture, allowing for cities to do other things like industry and commerce. It also allows for regions to have a higher population than the farms locally permit. As time changes, so does priorities and this is why the founding fathers allowed for amendments to be added and to even allow amendments to cancel others out. I do believe in the right to bear arms. The question is where is your limit? Do you believe felons, sex offenders, illegal aliens and enemies of the state should have the right to own guns? How about nuclear weapons?
I am arguing against increasing restrictions, not arguing for loosening them.
You will get no further reply from me along this vein, I'm not arguing that people should be allowed to have nuclear weapons, that's blatantly ******** ridiculous.
I am for the complete and unrestricted ownership of small arms by non-felons, or other persons who's rights have not been restricted. nuclear weapons are not small arms.
Then how do you propose a rebellion if you do not have military equipment?
Aircraft and bombs and missiles are not useful against an "enemy" that is deeply integrated with the civilians you don't want to kill.
And, in most states, there is nothing preventing somebody with the money from buying and owning a fully operational battle tank.
any civil war in the united states would be fought primarily with small arms and explosives.
armed civilians outnumber the military by orders of magnitude, to say nothing of members of the military who would refuse to fight civilians.
but largely, your force multipliers are useless in that kind of combat.
And why do you think they would have a problem with collateral?
What makes you think they wouldn't? you don't win a war by killing your own women and children, you'd lose public support, you'd lose military support. you'd look like assholes in the eyes of the world and you'd justify every nasty thing ever said about you.
the government might give the orders, but the military carries them out, and they will refuse to kill their own families just to get at them nasty gun owners.