Nekusu desu
not looking for fights neither is he
Is this a question or a statement? With your dedication to bad grammar, I can't tell.
Also, Anonymous Attributes
was looking for a confrontation, as evidenced by the way he said "
get off your horse and face me". Did you miss that part in your rush to defend him?
If you have to ask whether it is or not, it's probably not... but why don't you explain how you think it is.
Nekusu desu
since you're talking about me let me say, sorry
Are you apologizing in advance for something you're about to do? That demonstrates your intent to do something inappropriate, and therefore belies your apologetic nature.
Then again, maybe you were just misusing the word "sorry" just like you keep misusing the word "sad".
Nekusu desu
you all sound so butthurt
If you think that's what 'butthurt' sounds like, clearly you've never experienced butthurt.
That was the sound of people collectively rolling their eyes.
I'm sorry you feel that way. Care to elaborate on
why you think that, or was it just an insult for the sake of insulting us?
Nekusu desu
if (Anonymous Attributes) blocked all of you he has good reasons.
He blocked us because we challenged his incredibly shallow and narrow-minded interpretation of scripture, and when he gave us bullshit responses we challenged those in a way that he couldn't handle. He cried umbrage over the fact that we wouldn't accept him just repeating himself over and over again, and made a big arrogant show of blocking us.
Just rewind a few pages in this thread, and you can see this for yourself.
Nekusu desu
who said we spread nonesense? you?
Yes,
and an admin or two, but I digress.
AA is often
demonstrably incorrect, so that means that he is indeed spreading nonsense - especially considering that when anybody attempts to correct him, he pretends he's not wrong or makes excuses to justify how his incorrectness isn't incorrectness. (These justifications typically involve him invoking logical fallacies and/or straight-up bullshit.)
Nekusu desu
who are you to say that we are wrong? no one.
1. These two sentences are contextually incoherent as they are written.
2. This is a
debate forum. As such, if someone is wrong about something - especially concerning things of a factual nature - it's
everyone's place to say that person is wrong, provided they explain why and give support for it.