Shockascent
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 22:45:13 +0000
The Peppermint Bunny
shockascent
The Peppermint Bunny
shockascent
The Peppermint Bunny
Funny, I never said they got off at all. I said they were never shot at.
Just admit that you would rather read "trusted" sources than listen to people who actually experience racism because that's much easier for you. It's easy to believe the world is rainbows and sunshine when you shut out the truth.
You basically said that they got off lighter than a black person would have, implying that if your relatives were black, they would have been racially profiled and treated more severely.
Not every instance of a black person being racially profiled or dealing with a police officer results in said black person being shot, so I'm not going to automatically assume that that's a realistic stance you're taking when you say that white people are treated differently by the police. Unless you want me to assume that that's your argument? "If you're black, cops will automatically shoot you on sight for your skin color. If you're white, cops will just call your mom to come pick you up."
The Peppermint Bunny
Just admit that you would rather read "trusted" sources than listen to people who actually experience racism because that's much easier for you. It's easy to believe the world is rainbows and sunshine when you shut out the truth.
Are you saying that I should view my relative's experiences from a perspective that says the police were simply racially profiling them for being white? And as a result of this conclusion, I should make the broader conclusion that police in general racially profile white people and treat them differently than others because of a few personal accounts?
You didn't really address what I said. In context, what you have been saying implied that I should make the conclusion that I did based upon a handful of people's personal experiences.
I'm not sure if your willful ignorance is sad or funny. Probably both, but sadder than it is funny, I guess. Have fun losing yourself in "trusted" sources rather than listening to people.
Lol, you aren't even trying to address what I said.
What you've been implying is basically an argument from personal experience. It basically goes like this:
1. I had a personal experience of God
2. God exists
It's a wide jump to make that type of conclusion based upon a few pieces of anecdotal evidence. That's why it isn't always practical to use personal observations when making a generalization about something.
I didn't even read what you had to say, because it's clear that you are one of those types that believes if it isn't wearing a white hood or burning crosses, it's not racist.
Bye!
How can you know what I believe if you didn't even read what I said?
Or is this another ignorant and biased conclusion that you're coming to based upon the fact that I'm white? Did like two people tell you that white people were racist, since that's how you draw your conclusions?
I pointed out how the conclusion that you drew wasn't exactly applicable based upon how you chose to support it and based upon what you chose to support it with.
If you're going to make a generalization, then at least make sure that there's enough concrete evidence to suggest that the generaliation is at least remotely true.
Implying that "black people are treated differently than white people" isn't a generalization that someone can reasonably make based upon a few pieces of anecdotal evidence.