Article.
This tattoo that the woman had on her exposed leg, however, is a racy depiction of Tinkerbell naked, and getting herself off on a light switch.
The picture in the article is censored, but if you would like to see the actual tattoo, go
here.
Lana Massey took her 8-year-old son to Legoland, and she said that "after 10 minutes of playtime with my son, I was approached by Melanie, and was promptly escorted out of the main area while she proceeded to tell me that I was being asked to leave and offered a refund due to a customer complaint about my tattoos."
Massey, however, is using social media to cry discrimination.
"Legoland does have a policy in place in regards to expulsion for an offensive t-shirt, but not a tattoo. How do you think Legoland should have handled the situation, especially when the grounds for dismissal was due to a complaint from another customer? In case you forgot, Legoland is a children's attraction."
Honestly, I'm not sure. I kind of think Lana Massey a bit of an idiot for going to a children's attraction, and not taking care to cover up her Tinkerbell-getting-it-from-the-back-by-a-light-switch tattoo.
I also don't really feel Legoland was out of place by asking her to leave.
What do you think?
Did Legoland have every right to remove her from the premises? Or is censorship getting out of control?
Is Massey's removal from Legoland discrimination?
Should Massey have known better, and taken precautions to cover up any tattoo that might be deemed "inappropriate" for a children's attraction?